Menu

HomeConferencesCollectionsCalls for PapersMSF Research EthicsAboutMy Saved Content
Logo

Science Portal

  • My Saved Content
  • Browse All
  • Conferences
  • Collections
  • Calls for Papers
  • MSF Research Ethics
  • Clinical Case Reporting
  • About
English
logo
Science Portal
Copyright © Médecins Sans Frontières
v2.1.6174.produseast1
About MSF Science Portal
About
Contact Us
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Export All Citations
Copyright © Médecins Sans Frontières
v2.1.6174.produseast1
Journal Article
|Research

Decentralised rapid diagnostic tests enable cholera diagnosis by non-laboratory health workers during outbreaks in Cameroon

Boum II Y, Fai KN, Schramm B, Corine TM, Tchiasso D, Essomba R, Buri D, Ntone R, Eteki L, Mendjime P, Ndifon M, Fondze NR, Youm E, Eyong J, Kimm-Drapeau AL, Esso L, Mballa GAE, Lee GQ, Okomo MC, Porten K
Download

Abstract

Cholera has re-emerged as a major global public health emergency, with reported cases and deaths tripling between 2022 and 2025 especially in Africa, due to climate shocks, population displacement, fragile water and sanitation systems, and delays in laboratory confirmation. Early detection is critical to interrupt transmission and reduce mortality, underscoring the need for decentralised point-of-care diagnostics. We conducted a prospective field evaluation of three cholera rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs): SD Bioline Cholera Ag O1/O139, Crystal VC O1, and Cholkit, during active cholera outbreaks in Cameroon. Tests were performed on fresh stool samples by laboratory technicians and by non-laboratory health workers at primary health-care facilities. Diagnostic performance was assessed using PCR as the reference standard. In a subset of samples, RDTs were also performed after alkaline peptone water (APW) enrichment to assess its effect on diagnostic accuracy. Inter-operator agreement and ease of use were evaluated. Among 492 suspected cholera cases enrolled, 377 samples had PCR results available for analysis. When performed at the point of care, RDT sensitivity ranged from 88% to 95%, comparable to laboratory-based testing, while specificity ranged from 72% to 85%. APW enrichment was associated with a consistent reduction in sensitivity across all three RDTs and reduced specificity for SD Bioline. Inter-operator agreement was high (Cohen’s κ 0·81–0·89). More than 80% of end users reported that RDTs were easy to use under outbreak conditions. Cholera RDTs demonstrated high sensitivity, strong inter-operator reliability, and operational feasibility when deployed directly on fresh stool samples by non-laboratory staff. Integrating RDTs into decentralised surveillance systems, without APW enrichment, can accelerate outbreak detection and support timely response in high-burden, resource-limited settings.

Countries

Cameroon

Subject Area

diagnosticswater and sanitationcholeradisease surveillance

Languages

English
DOI
10.1038/s41598-026-55479-9
Published Date
03 Jun 2026
PubMed ID
42230911
Journal
Scientific Reports
Dimensions Badge
Similar Content
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...