Journal Article > LetterFull Text
Eur Respir J. 30 May 2024; Volume 63 (Issue 5); 2400436.; DOI:10.1183/13993003.00436-2024
Mesic A, Decuyper I, Ishaq S, Azizi T, Hadi Ziamal F, et al.
Eur Respir J. 30 May 2024; Volume 63 (Issue 5); 2400436.; DOI:10.1183/13993003.00436-2024
Journal Article > LetterSubscription Only
Eur Clin Respir J. 1 October 2023; Volume 62 (Issue 4); 2300556.; DOI:10.1183/13993003.00556-2023
Soares KA, Ehrlich J, Camara MS, Chaloub S, Emeka E, et al.
Eur Clin Respir J. 1 October 2023; Volume 62 (Issue 4); 2300556.; DOI:10.1183/13993003.00556-2023
Journal Article > CommentaryFull Text
Eur Respir J. 1 March 2020; Volume 55 (Issue 3); DOI:10.1183/13993003.01935-2019
Guglielmetti L, Huerga H, Khan UT, Varaine T
Eur Respir J. 1 March 2020; Volume 55 (Issue 3); DOI:10.1183/13993003.01935-2019
Journal Article > LetterFull Text
Eur Respir J. 1 December 2015; Volume 46 (Issue 6); DOI:10.1183/13993003.01374-2015
Hughes J, Isaakidis P, Andries A, Mansoor H, Cox V, et al.
Eur Respir J. 1 December 2015; Volume 46 (Issue 6); DOI:10.1183/13993003.01374-2015
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Eur Respir J. 20 March 2020; Volume 55 (Issue 3); 1901467.; DOI:10.1183/13993003.01467-2019
Abidi S, Achar J, Assao Neino MM, Bang D, Benedetti A, et al.
Eur Respir J. 20 March 2020; Volume 55 (Issue 3); 1901467.; DOI:10.1183/13993003.01467-2019
We sought to compare the effectiveness of two World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended regimens for the treatment of rifampin- or multidrug-resistant (RR/MDR) tuberculosis (TB): a standardised regimen of 9-12 months (the "shorter regimen") and individualised regimens of ≥20 months ("longer regimens").
We collected individual patient data from observational studies identified through systematic reviews and a public call for data. We included patients meeting WHO eligibility criteria for the shorter regimen: not previously treated with second-line drugs, and with fluoroquinolone- and second-line injectable agent-susceptible RR/MDR-TB. We used propensity score matched, mixed effects meta-regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios and adjusted risk differences (aRDs) for failure or relapse, death within 12 months of treatment initiation and loss to follow-up.
We included 2625 out of 3378 (77.7%) individuals from nine studies of shorter regimens and 2717 out of 13 104 (20.7%) individuals from 53 studies of longer regimens. Treatment success was higher with the shorter regimen than with longer regimens (pooled proportions 80.0% versus 75.3%), due to less loss to follow-up with the former (aRD -0.15, 95% CI -0.17- -0.12). The risk difference for failure or relapse was slightly higher with the shorter regimen overall (aRD 0.02, 95% CI 0-0.05) and greater in magnitude with baseline resistance to pyrazinamide (aRD 0.12, 95% CI 0.07-0.16), prothionamide/ethionamide (aRD 0.07, 95% CI -0.01-0.16) or ethambutol (aRD 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.13).
In patients meeting WHO criteria for its use, the standardised shorter regimen was associated with substantially less loss to follow-up during treatment compared with individualised longer regimens and with more failure or relapse in the presence of resistance to component medications. Our findings support the need to improve access to reliable drug susceptibility testing.
We collected individual patient data from observational studies identified through systematic reviews and a public call for data. We included patients meeting WHO eligibility criteria for the shorter regimen: not previously treated with second-line drugs, and with fluoroquinolone- and second-line injectable agent-susceptible RR/MDR-TB. We used propensity score matched, mixed effects meta-regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios and adjusted risk differences (aRDs) for failure or relapse, death within 12 months of treatment initiation and loss to follow-up.
We included 2625 out of 3378 (77.7%) individuals from nine studies of shorter regimens and 2717 out of 13 104 (20.7%) individuals from 53 studies of longer regimens. Treatment success was higher with the shorter regimen than with longer regimens (pooled proportions 80.0% versus 75.3%), due to less loss to follow-up with the former (aRD -0.15, 95% CI -0.17- -0.12). The risk difference for failure or relapse was slightly higher with the shorter regimen overall (aRD 0.02, 95% CI 0-0.05) and greater in magnitude with baseline resistance to pyrazinamide (aRD 0.12, 95% CI 0.07-0.16), prothionamide/ethionamide (aRD 0.07, 95% CI -0.01-0.16) or ethambutol (aRD 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.13).
In patients meeting WHO criteria for its use, the standardised shorter regimen was associated with substantially less loss to follow-up during treatment compared with individualised longer regimens and with more failure or relapse in the presence of resistance to component medications. Our findings support the need to improve access to reliable drug susceptibility testing.
Journal Article > ResearchAbstract Only
Eur Respir J. 17 June 2021; Volume 59 (Issue 1); 2101116.; DOI:10.1183/13993003.01116-2021
Orikiriza P, Smith JS, Ssekyanzi B, Nyehangane D, Mugisha IT, et al.
Eur Respir J. 17 June 2021; Volume 59 (Issue 1); 2101116.; DOI:10.1183/13993003.01116-2021
BACKGROUND
Non-sputum-based diagnostic approaches are crucial in children at high risk of disseminated tuberculosis (TB) who cannot expectorate sputum. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of stool Xpert MTB/RIF and urine AlereLAM tests in this group of children.
METHODS
Hospitalised children with presumptive TB and either age <2 years, HIV-positive or with severe malnutrition were enrolled in a diagnostic cohort. At enrolment, we attempted to collect two urine, two stool and two respiratory samples. Urine and stool were tested with AlereLAM and Xpert MTB/RIF, respectively. Respiratory samples were tested with Xpert MTB/RIF and mycobacterial culture. Both a microbiological and a composite clinical reference standard were used.
RESULTS
The study analysed 219 children; median age 16.4 months, 72 (32.9%) HIV-positive and 184 (84.4%) severely malnourished. 12 (5.5%) and 58 (28.5%) children had confirmed and unconfirmed TB, respectively. Stool and urine were collected in 219 (100%) and 216 (98.6%) children, respectively. Against the microbiological reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity of stool Xpert MTB/RIF was 50.0% (6/12, 95% CI 21.1–78.9%) and 99.1% (198/200, 95% 96.4–99.9%), while that of urine AlereLAM was 50.0% (6/12, 95% 21.1–78.9%) and 74.6% (147/197, 95% 67.9–80.5%), respectively. Against the composite reference standard, sensitivity was reduced to 11.4% (8/70) for stool and 26.2% (17/68) for urine, with no major difference by age group (<2 and ≥2 years) or HIV status.
CONCLUSIONS
The Xpert MTB/RIF assay has excellent specificity on stool, but sensitivity is suboptimal. Urine AlereLAM is compromised by poor sensitivity and specificity in children.
Non-sputum-based diagnostic approaches are crucial in children at high risk of disseminated tuberculosis (TB) who cannot expectorate sputum. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of stool Xpert MTB/RIF and urine AlereLAM tests in this group of children.
METHODS
Hospitalised children with presumptive TB and either age <2 years, HIV-positive or with severe malnutrition were enrolled in a diagnostic cohort. At enrolment, we attempted to collect two urine, two stool and two respiratory samples. Urine and stool were tested with AlereLAM and Xpert MTB/RIF, respectively. Respiratory samples were tested with Xpert MTB/RIF and mycobacterial culture. Both a microbiological and a composite clinical reference standard were used.
RESULTS
The study analysed 219 children; median age 16.4 months, 72 (32.9%) HIV-positive and 184 (84.4%) severely malnourished. 12 (5.5%) and 58 (28.5%) children had confirmed and unconfirmed TB, respectively. Stool and urine were collected in 219 (100%) and 216 (98.6%) children, respectively. Against the microbiological reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity of stool Xpert MTB/RIF was 50.0% (6/12, 95% CI 21.1–78.9%) and 99.1% (198/200, 95% 96.4–99.9%), while that of urine AlereLAM was 50.0% (6/12, 95% 21.1–78.9%) and 74.6% (147/197, 95% 67.9–80.5%), respectively. Against the composite reference standard, sensitivity was reduced to 11.4% (8/70) for stool and 26.2% (17/68) for urine, with no major difference by age group (<2 and ≥2 years) or HIV status.
CONCLUSIONS
The Xpert MTB/RIF assay has excellent specificity on stool, but sensitivity is suboptimal. Urine AlereLAM is compromised by poor sensitivity and specificity in children.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Eur Respir J. 25 October 2018; Volume 52 (Issue 6); DOI:10.1183/13993003.01528-2018
Ndjeka N, Schnippel K, Master I, Meintjes GA, Maartens G, et al.
Eur Respir J. 25 October 2018; Volume 52 (Issue 6); DOI:10.1183/13993003.01528-2018
Background: South African patients with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis and resistance to fluoroquinolones and/or injectables (pre/XDR-TB) were granted access to bedaquiline through a Clinical Access Programme with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria.Methods: Pre/XDR-TB and XDR-TB patients were treated with 24 weeks bedaquiline within an optimised, individualised background regimen that could include levofloxacin, linezolid and clofazimine as needed.Results: 200 patients were enrolled: 87 (43.9%) with XDR-TB, 99 (49.3%) were female, median age 34 years (IQR 27, 42). 134 (67.0%) were living with HIV; median CD4+ 281 (IQR 130; 467) and all on antiretroviral therapy.16/200 patients (8.0%) did not complete 6 months of bedaquiline of which 8 were lost to follow up, 6 died, 1 stopped for side effects and 1 patient was diagnosed with drug-sensitive TB.146/200 (73.0%) patients had favourable outcomes: 139/200 were cured (69.5%) and 7 completed treatment (3.5%). 25 died (12.5%), were lost from treatment (10.0%), 9 had treatment failure (4.5%).22 adverse events were attributed to bedaquiline: including QTcF >500 ms (n=5), QTcF increase >50 ms from baseline (n=11), paroxysmal atrial flutter (n=1).Conclusion: Bedaquiline added to an optimised background regimen was associated with a high rate of successful treatment outcomes for this MDR-TB and XDR-TB cohort.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Eur Respir J. 1 September 2016; Volume 48 (Issue 4); DOI:10.1183/13993003.00462-2016
Mitnick CD, White RA, Lu C, Rodriguez CA, Bayona J, et al.
Eur Respir J. 1 September 2016; Volume 48 (Issue 4); DOI:10.1183/13993003.00462-2016
Debate persists about monitoring method (culture or smear) and interval (monthly or less frequently) during treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). We analysed existing data and estimated the effect of monitoring strategies on timing of failure detection.We identified studies reporting microbiological response to MDR-TB treatment and solicited individual patient data from authors. Frailty survival models were used to estimate pooled relative risk of failure detection in the last 12 months of treatment; hazard of failure using monthly culture was the reference.Data were obtained for 5410 patients across 12 observational studies. During the last 12 months of treatment, failure detection occurred in a median of 3 months by monthly culture; failure detection was delayed by 2, 7, and 9 months relying on bimonthly culture, monthly smear and bimonthly smear, respectively. Risk (95% CI) of failure detection delay resulting from monthly smear relative to culture is 0.38 (0.34-0.42) for all patients and 0.33 (0.25-0.42) for HIV-co-infected patients.Failure detection is delayed by reducing the sensitivity and frequency of the monitoring method. Monthly monitoring of sputum cultures from patients receiving MDR-TB treatment is recommended. Expanded laboratory capacity is needed for high-quality culture, and for smear microscopy and rapid molecular tests.
Journal Article > LetterAbstract
Eur Respir J. 20 July 2017; Volume 50 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1183/13993003.00598-2017
Guglielmetti L, Varaine FFV, Huerga H, Bonnet MMB, Rich ML, et al.
Eur Respir J. 20 July 2017; Volume 50 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1183/13993003.00598-2017
Journal Article > LetterAbstract
Eur Respir J. 2 April 2015; Volume 46 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1183/09031936.00188114
Hughes J, Isaakidis P, Andries A, Mansoor H, Cox V, et al.
Eur Respir J. 2 April 2015; Volume 46 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1183/09031936.00188114