Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases. 2022 May 1; Volume 27; 100316.; DOI: 10.1016/j.jctube.2022.100316
Rucker SCM, Lissouba P, Akinyi M, Lubega AV, Stewart RC, et al.
Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases. 2022 May 1; Volume 27; 100316.; DOI: 10.1016/j.jctube.2022.100316
BACKGROUND
The novel urine-based FujiLAM test identifies tuberculosis in HIV-positive patients but may be challenging to use at point-of-care (POC).
OBJECTIVES
We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of using the FujiLAM test at the point of care in outpatient settings.
METHODS
We conducted a mixed-methods study in four outpatient settings in Kenya, Mozambique, South Africa, and Uganda between November 2020 and September 2021. The test was performed at POC in existing clinic laboratories and consultation spaces. We performed direct observations in the four health facilities, individual questionnaires, proficiency testing evaluations, and individual interviews among healthcare workers performing the FujiLAM test (healthcare workers), and group discussions with programme managers.
RESULTS
Overall, 18/19 (95%) healthcare workers and 14/14 (100%) managers agreed to participate in the study. Most assessed healthcare workers, including lay health workers (10/11; 91%), met the minimum required theoretical knowledge and practical skill in performing the FujiLAM test. Most healthcare workers (17/18; 94%) found the FujiLAM test overall “Easy/Very easy” to perform. Some challenges were mentioned: many timed steps (5/18; 28%); ensuring correct incubation period (5/18; 28%); test result readability (4/18; 22%); and difficulties with cartridge buttons (3/18; 17%). Half of the healthcare workers regularly performing the test (4/7; 57%) found it “Easy” to integrate into routine activities. Most healthcare workers and managers believed that any healthcare worker could perform the test after adequate training.
CONCLUSIONS
Implementing the FujiLAM test in outpatient POC settings is feasible and acceptable to healthcare workers and managers. This test can be performed in various clinic locations by any healthcare worker. The timed, multi-step test procedure is challenging and may affect the workload in resource-constrained health facilities.
The novel urine-based FujiLAM test identifies tuberculosis in HIV-positive patients but may be challenging to use at point-of-care (POC).
OBJECTIVES
We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of using the FujiLAM test at the point of care in outpatient settings.
METHODS
We conducted a mixed-methods study in four outpatient settings in Kenya, Mozambique, South Africa, and Uganda between November 2020 and September 2021. The test was performed at POC in existing clinic laboratories and consultation spaces. We performed direct observations in the four health facilities, individual questionnaires, proficiency testing evaluations, and individual interviews among healthcare workers performing the FujiLAM test (healthcare workers), and group discussions with programme managers.
RESULTS
Overall, 18/19 (95%) healthcare workers and 14/14 (100%) managers agreed to participate in the study. Most assessed healthcare workers, including lay health workers (10/11; 91%), met the minimum required theoretical knowledge and practical skill in performing the FujiLAM test. Most healthcare workers (17/18; 94%) found the FujiLAM test overall “Easy/Very easy” to perform. Some challenges were mentioned: many timed steps (5/18; 28%); ensuring correct incubation period (5/18; 28%); test result readability (4/18; 22%); and difficulties with cartridge buttons (3/18; 17%). Half of the healthcare workers regularly performing the test (4/7; 57%) found it “Easy” to integrate into routine activities. Most healthcare workers and managers believed that any healthcare worker could perform the test after adequate training.
CONCLUSIONS
Implementing the FujiLAM test in outpatient POC settings is feasible and acceptable to healthcare workers and managers. This test can be performed in various clinic locations by any healthcare worker. The timed, multi-step test procedure is challenging and may affect the workload in resource-constrained health facilities.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
PLOS One. 2022 March 30; Volume 17 (Issue 3); e0264442.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0264442
Kitenge M, Laxmeshwar C, Bermudez-Aza EH, Ford-Kamara E, van Custem G, et al.
PLOS One. 2022 March 30; Volume 17 (Issue 3); e0264442.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0264442
BACKGROUND
Innovative models to distribute oral HIV self-tests (HIVST) provide an opportunity to increase access to HIV testing, especially for hard-to-reach populations. This study aimed to describe the acceptability of unsupervised peer-distribution of HIVST as a method to scale-up HIV testing.
METHODS
In this study, lay counsellors or community health workers provided HIVST kits to primary recipients (PRs) for distribution to their sexual partners, anyone in their social network (termed secondary recipients) or for self-testing, from September 2018 to March 2020. The study was conducted in Eshowe and Mbongolwane areas in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. A structured questionnaire was administered during the recruitment and passive follow-up, when people came for confirmatory HIV testing. Electronic records were retrospectively examined to determine initiation of antiretroviral treatment (ART) for all HIVST users and non-users.
RESULTS
Among 36,708 people approached to be primary recipients, 9,891 (26.9%) accepted; 31,341 HIVST kits were distributed with a median of three (IQR: 2-4) per peer. PRs were predominately recruited at primary health clinics (PHCs). However, acceptability of HIVST was thrice as high at community-based testing sites compared to PHCs (64.5% vs. 21.0%; p<0.001). During the study period, 34,715 adults were tested for HIV at both PHCs and community-based testing sites; of these, 1,089 individuals reported HIVST use. Among HIVST users, 893 (82.0%) returned to the clinic for confirmatory testing after testing negative on HIVST; 196 (17.9%) were confirmed HIV positive following a positive HIVST. After excluding 36/196 (18.4%) participants for whom clinical records could not be found in electronic register and 25/160 (15.6%) who were already on ART before receiving HIVST, 129/135 (95.5%) initiated ART, whereas 2,362/2685 (88%) of HIV positive HIVST non-users-initiated ART.
CONCLUSION
Unsupervised peer-distribution of HIVST was feasible and acceptable, with more than 25% accepting to be peer-distributors. Acceptability of HIVST was thrice as high in community sites compared to clinics.
Innovative models to distribute oral HIV self-tests (HIVST) provide an opportunity to increase access to HIV testing, especially for hard-to-reach populations. This study aimed to describe the acceptability of unsupervised peer-distribution of HIVST as a method to scale-up HIV testing.
METHODS
In this study, lay counsellors or community health workers provided HIVST kits to primary recipients (PRs) for distribution to their sexual partners, anyone in their social network (termed secondary recipients) or for self-testing, from September 2018 to March 2020. The study was conducted in Eshowe and Mbongolwane areas in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. A structured questionnaire was administered during the recruitment and passive follow-up, when people came for confirmatory HIV testing. Electronic records were retrospectively examined to determine initiation of antiretroviral treatment (ART) for all HIVST users and non-users.
RESULTS
Among 36,708 people approached to be primary recipients, 9,891 (26.9%) accepted; 31,341 HIVST kits were distributed with a median of three (IQR: 2-4) per peer. PRs were predominately recruited at primary health clinics (PHCs). However, acceptability of HIVST was thrice as high at community-based testing sites compared to PHCs (64.5% vs. 21.0%; p<0.001). During the study period, 34,715 adults were tested for HIV at both PHCs and community-based testing sites; of these, 1,089 individuals reported HIVST use. Among HIVST users, 893 (82.0%) returned to the clinic for confirmatory testing after testing negative on HIVST; 196 (17.9%) were confirmed HIV positive following a positive HIVST. After excluding 36/196 (18.4%) participants for whom clinical records could not be found in electronic register and 25/160 (15.6%) who were already on ART before receiving HIVST, 129/135 (95.5%) initiated ART, whereas 2,362/2685 (88%) of HIV positive HIVST non-users-initiated ART.
CONCLUSION
Unsupervised peer-distribution of HIVST was feasible and acceptable, with more than 25% accepting to be peer-distributors. Acceptability of HIVST was thrice as high in community sites compared to clinics.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 December 14; Volume 2 (Issue 12); e0000336.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0000336
Shigayeva A, Gcwensa N, Ndlovu CD, Ntumase N, Sabela S, et al.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 December 14; Volume 2 (Issue 12); e0000336.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0000336
Differentiated models of HIV care (DMOC) aim to improve health care efficiency. We describe outcomes of five DMOC in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: facility adherence clubs (facility AC) and community adherence clubs (community AC), community antiretroviral treatment (ART) groups (CAG), spaced fast lane appointments (SFLA), and community pick up points (PuP). This retrospective cohort study included 8241 eligible patients enrolled into DMOC between 1/1/2012 and 31/12/2018. We assessed retention in DMOC and on ART, and viral load suppression (<1000 copies/mL). Kaplan-Meier techniques were applied to describe crude retention. Mixed effects parametric survival models with Weibull distribution and clustering on health center and individual levels were used to assess predictors for ART and DMOC attrition, and VL rebound (≥1000 copies/mL). Overall DMOC retention was 85%, 80%, and 76% at 12, 24 and 36 months. ART retention at 12, 24 and 36 months was 96%, 93%, 90%. Overall incidence rate of VL rebound was 1.9 episodes per 100 person-years. VL rebound rate was 4.9 episodes per 100 person-years among those enrolled in 2012–2015, and 0.8 episodes per 100 person-years among those enrolled in 2016–2018 (RR 0.12; 95% CI, 0.09–0.15, p<0.001). Prevalence of confirmed virological failure was 0.6% (38/6113). Predictors of attrition from DMOC and from ART were male gender, younger age, shorter duration on ART before enrollment. Low level viremia (>00–399 copies/mL) was associated with higher hazards of VL rebound and attrition from ART. Concurrent implementation of several DMOC in a large ART program is feasible and can achieve sustained retention on ART and VL suppression.
Journal Article > CommentaryFull Text
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2020 November 1; Volume 24 (Issue 11); 1134-1144.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.20.0330
Cox V, McKenna L, Acquah R, Reuter A, Wasserman S, et al.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2020 November 1; Volume 24 (Issue 11); 1134-1144.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.20.0330
Rapid diagnostics, newer drugs, repurposed medications, and shorter regimens have radically altered the landscape for treating rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) and multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB). There are multiple ongoing clinical trials aiming to build a robust evidence base to guide RR/MDR-TB treatment, and both observational studies and programmatic data have contributed to advancing the treatment field. In December 2019, the WHO issued their second ‘Rapid Communication´ related to RR-TB management. This reiterated their prior recommendation that a majority of people with RR/MDR-TB receive all-oral treatment regimens, and now allow for specific shorter duration regimens to be used programmatically as well. Many TB programs need clinical advice as they seek to roll out such regimens in their specific setting. In this Perspective, we highlight our early experiences and lessons learned from working with National TB Programs, adult and pediatric clinicians and civil society, in optimizing treatment of RR/MDR-TB, using shorter, highly-effective, oral regimens for the majority of people with RR/MDR-TB.
Other > Pre-Print
Sci Rep. 2024 March 8; DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3967595/v1
Bulti AB, Dumicho AY, Shigayeva A, van Cutsem G, Steele SJ, et al.
Sci Rep. 2024 March 8; DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3967595/v1
BACKGROUND
Tuberculosis (TB) among hospitalized patients is underdiagnosed. This study assessed systematic TB-screening, followed by an enhanced TB-diagnostic package for hospitalized patients implemented by trained lay health workers in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
METHODS
In this before-and-after study we included patients ≥ 18 years. The intervention consisted of systematic clinical screening for TB, HIV and diabetes mellitus by lay health workers and provision of an enhanced TB-diagnostic package including sputum Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra, urine lateral-flow lipoarabinomannan assay (LF-LAM), chest x-ray, and sputum culture. We compared TB case findings with people hospitalized one year preceding the intervention.
RESULTS
In the pre-intervention phase, 5217 people were hospitalized. Among 4913 (94.2%) people not on TB treatment, 367 (7.5%) were diagnosed with TB. In the intervention phase, 4015 eligible people were hospitalized. Among 3734 (93.0%) people not on TB treatment, 560 (15.0%) were diagnosed with TB. The proportion of patients diagnosed with TB was higher in the intervention phase (15.0% vs. 7.5%, p < 0.001). Overall in-hospital mortality was lower in the intervention phase [166/3734(4.5%) vs. 336/4913(6.8%), p < 0.001].
CONCLUSION
Lay health worker-led implementation of systematic TB-screening, coupled with provision of an enhanced TB-diagnostic package significantly improved TB case detection and mortality among hospitalized adults.
Tuberculosis (TB) among hospitalized patients is underdiagnosed. This study assessed systematic TB-screening, followed by an enhanced TB-diagnostic package for hospitalized patients implemented by trained lay health workers in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
METHODS
In this before-and-after study we included patients ≥ 18 years. The intervention consisted of systematic clinical screening for TB, HIV and diabetes mellitus by lay health workers and provision of an enhanced TB-diagnostic package including sputum Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra, urine lateral-flow lipoarabinomannan assay (LF-LAM), chest x-ray, and sputum culture. We compared TB case findings with people hospitalized one year preceding the intervention.
RESULTS
In the pre-intervention phase, 5217 people were hospitalized. Among 4913 (94.2%) people not on TB treatment, 367 (7.5%) were diagnosed with TB. In the intervention phase, 4015 eligible people were hospitalized. Among 3734 (93.0%) people not on TB treatment, 560 (15.0%) were diagnosed with TB. The proportion of patients diagnosed with TB was higher in the intervention phase (15.0% vs. 7.5%, p < 0.001). Overall in-hospital mortality was lower in the intervention phase [166/3734(4.5%) vs. 336/4913(6.8%), p < 0.001].
CONCLUSION
Lay health worker-led implementation of systematic TB-screening, coupled with provision of an enhanced TB-diagnostic package significantly improved TB case detection and mortality among hospitalized adults.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
BMJ Open. 2023 November 30; Volume 13 (Issue 11); e058805.; DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058805
Lissouba P, Rücker SCM, Otieno LA, Akatukwasa C, Xulu S, et al.
BMJ Open. 2023 November 30; Volume 13 (Issue 11); e058805.; DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058805
OBJECTIVES
Evidence on the acceptability of urine-based assays for tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis among patients remains limited. We sought to describe patients’ experiences and perceptions of urine sampling for TB testing at point of care.
SETTING
Study sites in Kenya, Uganda, Mozambique and South Africa.
PARTICIPANTS
Adult ambulatory HIV patients enrolled in a TB diagnostic study were selected purposively.
INTERVENTION
For this qualitative descriptive study, audiorecorded individual interviews conducted with consenting participants were translated, transcribed and analysed using content analysis. Ethical agreement was obtained from relevant ethical review committees.
RESULTS
Fifty-eight participants were interviewed. Three domains were identified. Overall, participants described urine sampling as easy, rapid and painless, with the main challenge being lacking the urge. Urine was preferred to sputum sampling in terms of simplicity, comfort, stigma reduction, convenience and practicality. While perceptions regarding its trustworthiness for TB diagnosis differed, urine sampling was viewed as an additional mean to detect TB and beneficial for early diagnosis. Participants were willing to wait for several hours for same-day results to allay the emotional, physical and financial burden of having to return to collect results, and would rather not pay for the test. Facilitators of urine sampling included cleanliness and perceived privacy of sampling environments, comprehensive sampling instructions and test information, as well as supplies such as toilet paper and envelopes ensuring confort and privacy when producing and returning samples. Participants motivation for accepting urine-based TB testing stemmed from their perceived susceptibility to TB, the value they attributed to their health, especially when experiencing symptoms, and their positive interactions with the medical team.
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that urine sampling is well accepted as a TB diagnostic method and provides insights on how to promote patients’ uptake of urine-based testing and improve their sampling experiences. These results encourage the future broad use of urine-based assays at point of care.
Evidence on the acceptability of urine-based assays for tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis among patients remains limited. We sought to describe patients’ experiences and perceptions of urine sampling for TB testing at point of care.
SETTING
Study sites in Kenya, Uganda, Mozambique and South Africa.
PARTICIPANTS
Adult ambulatory HIV patients enrolled in a TB diagnostic study were selected purposively.
INTERVENTION
For this qualitative descriptive study, audiorecorded individual interviews conducted with consenting participants were translated, transcribed and analysed using content analysis. Ethical agreement was obtained from relevant ethical review committees.
RESULTS
Fifty-eight participants were interviewed. Three domains were identified. Overall, participants described urine sampling as easy, rapid and painless, with the main challenge being lacking the urge. Urine was preferred to sputum sampling in terms of simplicity, comfort, stigma reduction, convenience and practicality. While perceptions regarding its trustworthiness for TB diagnosis differed, urine sampling was viewed as an additional mean to detect TB and beneficial for early diagnosis. Participants were willing to wait for several hours for same-day results to allay the emotional, physical and financial burden of having to return to collect results, and would rather not pay for the test. Facilitators of urine sampling included cleanliness and perceived privacy of sampling environments, comprehensive sampling instructions and test information, as well as supplies such as toilet paper and envelopes ensuring confort and privacy when producing and returning samples. Participants motivation for accepting urine-based TB testing stemmed from their perceived susceptibility to TB, the value they attributed to their health, especially when experiencing symptoms, and their positive interactions with the medical team.
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that urine sampling is well accepted as a TB diagnostic method and provides insights on how to promote patients’ uptake of urine-based testing and improve their sampling experiences. These results encourage the future broad use of urine-based assays at point of care.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 December 29; DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaa1894
Tack I, Dumicho A, Ohler L, Shigayeva A, Bulti AB, et al.
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 December 29; DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaa1894
Background
At the end of 2018, South Africa updated its all-oral regimen, to include bedaquiline (BDQ) and two months of linezolid (LZD) for all patients initiating the shorter 9 to 12 months regimen for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB). We assessed a group of patients in rural KwaZulu-Natal for safety and effectiveness of this treatment regimen under programmatic conditions.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis on RR-TB patients treated with a standardized all-oral short regimen between July 1, 2018 and April 30, 2019 in three facilities in King Cetshwayo District. An electronic register (EDR Web) and facility-based clinical charts were used to collect variables which were entered into an Epi-Info database.
Results
Our cohort included 117 patients; 68.4%(95%CI:59.3-76.3) were HIV positive. The median time to culture conversion was 56 days(95%CI:50-57). Treatment success was achieved in 75.2%(95%CI:66.5-82.3) of patients. Mortality within the cohort was 12.8%(95%CI:7.8-20.3). Anaemia was the most frequent severe adverse event. The median time to develop severe anaemia was 7.1 weeks(IQR 4.0-12.9) after treatment initiation. LZD was interrupted in 25.2%(95%CI:17.8-34.5) of participants.
Conclusions
An all-oral shorter regimen, including BDQ and LZD as core drugs for the treatment of RR-TB, shows good outcomes, in a high HIV burden rural setting. Adverse events (AEs) are common, especially for LZD, but could be managed in the program setting. Support is needed when introducing new regimens to upskill staff in the monitoring, management and reporting of AEs.
At the end of 2018, South Africa updated its all-oral regimen, to include bedaquiline (BDQ) and two months of linezolid (LZD) for all patients initiating the shorter 9 to 12 months regimen for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB). We assessed a group of patients in rural KwaZulu-Natal for safety and effectiveness of this treatment regimen under programmatic conditions.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis on RR-TB patients treated with a standardized all-oral short regimen between July 1, 2018 and April 30, 2019 in three facilities in King Cetshwayo District. An electronic register (EDR Web) and facility-based clinical charts were used to collect variables which were entered into an Epi-Info database.
Results
Our cohort included 117 patients; 68.4%(95%CI:59.3-76.3) were HIV positive. The median time to culture conversion was 56 days(95%CI:50-57). Treatment success was achieved in 75.2%(95%CI:66.5-82.3) of patients. Mortality within the cohort was 12.8%(95%CI:7.8-20.3). Anaemia was the most frequent severe adverse event. The median time to develop severe anaemia was 7.1 weeks(IQR 4.0-12.9) after treatment initiation. LZD was interrupted in 25.2%(95%CI:17.8-34.5) of participants.
Conclusions
An all-oral shorter regimen, including BDQ and LZD as core drugs for the treatment of RR-TB, shows good outcomes, in a high HIV burden rural setting. Adverse events (AEs) are common, especially for LZD, but could be managed in the program setting. Support is needed when introducing new regimens to upskill staff in the monitoring, management and reporting of AEs.
Journal Article > LetterFull Text
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2022 May 1; Volume 26 (Issue 5); 463-465.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.22.0001
Conan N, Simons E, Ohler L, Mbatha M, van Custem G, et al.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2022 May 1; Volume 26 (Issue 5); 463-465.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.22.0001
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Lancet Global Health. 2023 January 1; Volume 11 (Issue 1); e126-e135.; DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00463-6
Huerga H, Bastard M, Lubega AV, Akinyi M, Antabak NT, et al.
Lancet Global Health. 2023 January 1; Volume 11 (Issue 1); e126-e135.; DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00463-6
BACKGROUND
Development of rapid biomarker-based tests that can diagnose tuberculosis using non-sputum samples is a priority for tuberculosis control. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the novel Fujifilm SILVAMP TB LAM (FujiLAM) assay with the WHO-recommended Alere Determine TB-LAM Ag test (AlereLAM) using urine samples from HIV-positive patients.
METHODS
We did a diagnostic accuracy study at five outpatient public health facilities in Uganda, Kenya, Mozambique, and South Africa. Eligible patients were ambulatory HIV-positive individuals (aged ≥15 years) with symptoms of tuberculosis irrespective of their CD4 T-cell count (group 1), and asymptomatic patients with advanced HIV disease (CD4 count <200 cells per μL, or HIV clinical stage 3 or 4; group 2). All participants underwent clinical examination, chest x-ray, and blood sampling, and were requested to provide a fresh urine sample, and two sputum samples. FujiLAM and AlereLAM urine assays, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay on sputum or urine, sputum culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and CD4 count were systematically carried out for all patients. Sensitivity and specificity of FujiLAM and AlereLAM were evaluated against microbiological and composite reference standards.
FINDINGS
Between Aug 24, 2020 and Sept 21, 2021, 1575 patients (823 [52·3%] women) were included in the study: 1031 patients in group 1 and 544 patients in group 2. Tuberculosis was microbiologically confirmed in 96 (9·4%) of 1022 patients in group 1 and 18 (3·3%) of 542 patients in group 2. Using the microbiological reference standard, FujiLAM sensitivity was 60% (95% CI 51–69) and AlereLAM sensitivity was 40% (31–49; p<0·001). Among patients with CD4 counts of less than 200 cells per μL, FujiLAM sensitivity was 69% (57–79) and AlereLAM sensitivity was 52% (40–64; p=0·0218). Among patients with CD4 counts of 200 cells per μL or higher, FujiLAM sensitivity was 47% (34–61) and AlereLAM sensitivity was 24% (14–38; p=0·0116). Using the microbiological reference standard, FujiLAM specificity was 87% (95% CI 85–89) and AlereLAM specificity was 86% (95 CI 84–88; p=0·941). FujiLAM sensitivity varied by lot number from 48% (34–62) to 76% (57–89) and specificity from 77% (72–81) to 98% (93–99).
INTERPRETATION
Next-generation, higher sensitivity urine-lipoarabinomannan assays are potentially promising tests that allow rapid tuberculosis diagnosis at the point of care for HIV-positive patients. However, the variability in accuracy between FujiLAM lot numbers needs to be addressed before clinical use.
Development of rapid biomarker-based tests that can diagnose tuberculosis using non-sputum samples is a priority for tuberculosis control. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the novel Fujifilm SILVAMP TB LAM (FujiLAM) assay with the WHO-recommended Alere Determine TB-LAM Ag test (AlereLAM) using urine samples from HIV-positive patients.
METHODS
We did a diagnostic accuracy study at five outpatient public health facilities in Uganda, Kenya, Mozambique, and South Africa. Eligible patients were ambulatory HIV-positive individuals (aged ≥15 years) with symptoms of tuberculosis irrespective of their CD4 T-cell count (group 1), and asymptomatic patients with advanced HIV disease (CD4 count <200 cells per μL, or HIV clinical stage 3 or 4; group 2). All participants underwent clinical examination, chest x-ray, and blood sampling, and were requested to provide a fresh urine sample, and two sputum samples. FujiLAM and AlereLAM urine assays, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay on sputum or urine, sputum culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and CD4 count were systematically carried out for all patients. Sensitivity and specificity of FujiLAM and AlereLAM were evaluated against microbiological and composite reference standards.
FINDINGS
Between Aug 24, 2020 and Sept 21, 2021, 1575 patients (823 [52·3%] women) were included in the study: 1031 patients in group 1 and 544 patients in group 2. Tuberculosis was microbiologically confirmed in 96 (9·4%) of 1022 patients in group 1 and 18 (3·3%) of 542 patients in group 2. Using the microbiological reference standard, FujiLAM sensitivity was 60% (95% CI 51–69) and AlereLAM sensitivity was 40% (31–49; p<0·001). Among patients with CD4 counts of less than 200 cells per μL, FujiLAM sensitivity was 69% (57–79) and AlereLAM sensitivity was 52% (40–64; p=0·0218). Among patients with CD4 counts of 200 cells per μL or higher, FujiLAM sensitivity was 47% (34–61) and AlereLAM sensitivity was 24% (14–38; p=0·0116). Using the microbiological reference standard, FujiLAM specificity was 87% (95% CI 85–89) and AlereLAM specificity was 86% (95 CI 84–88; p=0·941). FujiLAM sensitivity varied by lot number from 48% (34–62) to 76% (57–89) and specificity from 77% (72–81) to 98% (93–99).
INTERPRETATION
Next-generation, higher sensitivity urine-lipoarabinomannan assays are potentially promising tests that allow rapid tuberculosis diagnosis at the point of care for HIV-positive patients. However, the variability in accuracy between FujiLAM lot numbers needs to be addressed before clinical use.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 November 2; Volume 73 (Issue 9); e3563-e3571.; DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1894
Tack I, Dumicho A, Ohler L, Shigayeva A, Bulti AB, et al.
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 November 2; Volume 73 (Issue 9); e3563-e3571.; DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1894
BACKGROUND
At the end of 2018, South Africa updated its all-oral regimen to include bedaquiline (BDQ) and 2 months of linezolid (LZD) for all patients initiating the shorter 9-12 months regimen for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB). We assessed a group of patients in rural KwaZulu-Natal for safety and effectiveness of this treatment regimen under programmatic conditions.
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis on RR-TB patients treated with a standardized all-oral short regimen between 1 July 2018 and 30 April 2019 in 3 facilities in King Cetshwayo District. An electronic register (EDR web) and facility-based clinical charts were used to collect variables, which were entered into an Epi-Info database.
RESULTS
Our cohort included 117 patients; 68.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59.3-76.3) tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The median time to culture conversion was 56 days (95% CI: 50-57). Treatment success was achieved in 75.2% (95% CI: 66.5-82.3) of patients. Mortality within the cohort was 12.8% (95% CI: 7.8-20.3). Anemia was the most frequent severe adverse event (AE). The median time to develop severe anemia was 7.1 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 4.0-12.9) after treatment initiation. LZD was interrupted in 25.2% (95% CI: 17.8-34.5) of participants.
CONCLUSIONS
An all-oral shorter regimen, including BDQ and LZD as core drugs for the treatment of RR-TB, shows good outcomes, in a high HIV burden rural setting. AEs are common, especially for LZD, but could be managed in the program setting. Support is needed when introducing new regimens to train staff in the monitoring, management, and reporting of AEs.
At the end of 2018, South Africa updated its all-oral regimen to include bedaquiline (BDQ) and 2 months of linezolid (LZD) for all patients initiating the shorter 9-12 months regimen for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB). We assessed a group of patients in rural KwaZulu-Natal for safety and effectiveness of this treatment regimen under programmatic conditions.
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis on RR-TB patients treated with a standardized all-oral short regimen between 1 July 2018 and 30 April 2019 in 3 facilities in King Cetshwayo District. An electronic register (EDR web) and facility-based clinical charts were used to collect variables, which were entered into an Epi-Info database.
RESULTS
Our cohort included 117 patients; 68.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59.3-76.3) tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The median time to culture conversion was 56 days (95% CI: 50-57). Treatment success was achieved in 75.2% (95% CI: 66.5-82.3) of patients. Mortality within the cohort was 12.8% (95% CI: 7.8-20.3). Anemia was the most frequent severe adverse event (AE). The median time to develop severe anemia was 7.1 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 4.0-12.9) after treatment initiation. LZD was interrupted in 25.2% (95% CI: 17.8-34.5) of participants.
CONCLUSIONS
An all-oral shorter regimen, including BDQ and LZD as core drugs for the treatment of RR-TB, shows good outcomes, in a high HIV burden rural setting. AEs are common, especially for LZD, but could be managed in the program setting. Support is needed when introducing new regimens to train staff in the monitoring, management, and reporting of AEs.