Severely malnourished patients can present with bilateral pitting oedema, which is a common sign of Kwashiorkor. However, bilateral pitting oedema can also be an expression of other pathologies. In Mali and DRC, the number of children presenting with bilateral pitting oedema at MSF (Médecins Sans Frontiers/Doctors Without Borders) hospitals are up to 30% (Mali) and 49% (DRC) higher than in other countries, however, the reasons underlying this trend are unknown. Through this qualitative study, we aimed to explore the perspectives and lived experiences of health professionals on the diagnosis and management of children with bilateral pitting oedema. Using a participatory approach, we conducted 21 in-depth interviews, and 2 focus groups with health professionals at MSF health facilities who had worked in the settings of Koutiala (Mali) and Rutshuru (DRC) for at least 6 months. The understanding of the bilateral pitting oedema phenomenon is complex. Health workers described clinical obstacles to reducing mortality, including: i) difficulties making the diagnosis due to a lack of specialized staff and insufficient resources, ii) challenges treating complications that may arise due to the complexity of the diseases associated with bilateral pitting oedema, and iii) lack of scientific evidence in the literature explaining the physiopathology of bilateral pitting oedema. Study participants shared several key recommendations for reducing mortality among children presenting with bilateral pitting oedema, including prevention of bilateral pitting oedema at the community level, standardization of the diagnostic process, strengthening of medical training, and better collaboration both within the medical teams and between teams and the children’s families.

In 2021 in response to an outbreak of hepatitis E in Bentiu internally displaced persons camp the South Sudanese Ministry of Health with support from Médecins Sans Frontières implemented the first-ever mass reactive vaccination campaign with HEV239 (Hecolin; Innovax, Xiamen, China). We conducted qualitative research to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to hepatitis E and the hepatitis E vaccine. We conducted 8 focus group discussions (FGDs) with community leaders, the general population of vaccine-eligible adults, vaccine-eligible pregnant women (vaccinated and non-vaccinated), and healthcare workers. FGDs were separate by gender and were audio recorded, transcribed, and translated to English. Two coders used inductive thematic analysis to organize emergent themes. Data were collected in November 2022. Most participants had experiences with hepatitis E (e.g., infected themselves or knowing someone that had been infected) and viewed hepatitis E as a dangerous disease. Participants believed children, pregnant women, and older persons were the highest risk groups and frequently made requests for additional hepatitis E vaccination campaigns and expanded eligibility criteria for vaccination. Knowledge of the negative impacts of hepatitis E and trusted relationships with the organizations offering the vaccine were key facilitators of vaccine acceptance. The primary barriers to vaccination were practical issues related to being away from the camp during the campaign or not knowing about the campaign, but participants shared that some in the community were unvaccinated due to fears about injections, social pressure, misinformation, and concerns about why some groups were eligible for vaccination and not others (e.g., young children). Personal experiences with hepatitis E illness, perceived severity of illness, and confidence in organizations recommending the vaccine were drivers of high demand for hepatitis E vaccines in the first-ever use of the vaccine in an outbreak setting. Addressing practical issues related to population mobility can improve coverage in future campaigns.

Ultraportable (UP) X-ray devices are ideal to use in community-based settings, particularly for chest X-ray (CXR) screening of tuberculosis (TB). Unfortunately, there is insufficient guidance on the radiation safety of these devices. This study aims to determine the radiation dose by UP X-ray devices to both the public and radiographers compared to international dose limits. Radiation dose measurements were performed with four UP X-ray devices that met international criteria, utilizing a clinically representative CXR set-up made with a thorax phantom. Scatter and leakage radiation dose were measured at various positions surrounding the phantom and X-ray tube, respectively. These measurements were used to calculate yearly radiation doses for different scenarios based on the median of all UP X-ray devices. From the yearly scatter doses, the minimum distances from the phantom needed to stay below the international public dose limit (1 mSv/year) were calculated. This distance was longest in the direction back towards the X-ray tube and shortest to the left/right sides of the phantom, e.g., 4.5 m and 2.5 m resp. when performing 50 exams/day, at 90 kV, 2.5 mAs and source skin distance (SSD) 1 m. Additional calculations including leakage radiation were conducted at a typical radiographer position (i.e., behind the X-ray tube), with a correction factor for wearing a lead apron. At 2 m behind the X-ray tube, a radiographer wearing a lead apron could perform 106 exams/day at 2.5 mAs and 29 exams/day at 10 mAs (90 kV, SSD 1 m), while keeping his/her radiation dose below the public dose limit (1 mSv/year) and well below the radiographer dose limit (20 mSv/year). In most CXR screening scenarios, the radiation dose of UP X-ray devices can be kept below 1 mSv/year by employing basic radiation safety rules on time, distance and shielding and using appropriate CXR exposure parameters.

In sub-Saharan Africa, reported COVID-19 numbers have been lower than anticipated, even when considering populations’ younger age. The extent to which risk factors, established in industrialised countries, impact the risk of infection and of disease in populations in sub-Saharan Africa, remains unclear. We estimated the incidence of mild and moderate COVID-19 in urban Mozambique and analysed factors associated with infection and disease in a population-based surveillance study. During December 2020-March 2022, 1,561 households (6,049 participants, median 21 years, 54.8% female, 7.3% disclosed HIV positive) of Polana Caniço, Maputo, Mozambique, were visited biweekly to report respiratory symptoms, anosmia, or ageusia, and self-administer a nasal swab for SARS-CoV-2 testing. Every three months, dried blood spots of a subset of participants (1,412) were collected for detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein and nucleocapsid protein. Per 1000 person-years, 364.5 (95%CI 352.8–376.1) respiratory illness episodes were reported, of which 72.2 (95%CI 60.6–83.9) were COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence rose from 4.8% (95%CI 1.1–8.6%) in December 2020 to 34.7% (95%CI 20.2–49.3%) in June 2021, when 3.0% were vaccinated. Increasing age, chronic lung disease, hypertension, and overweight increased risk of COVID-19. Older age increased the risk of SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion. We observed no association between socio-economic status, behaviour and COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion. Active surveillance in an urban population confirmed frequent COVID-19 underreporting, yet indicated that the large majority of cases were mild and non-febrile. In contrast to reports from industrialised countries, social deprivation did not increase the risk of infection nor disease.