Conference Material > Slide Presentation
Yatskevich N, Hurevich H, Solodovnikova V, Garsevanidze E, Lachenal N, et al.
MSF Scientific Day International 2023. 2023 June 7; DOI:10.57740/3sk2-bf43
Journal Article > CommentaryFull Text
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2020 November 1; Volume 24 (Issue 11); 1134-1144.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.20.0330
Cox V, McKenna L, Acquah R, Reuter A, Wasserman S, et al.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2020 November 1; Volume 24 (Issue 11); 1134-1144.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.20.0330
Rapid diagnostics, newer drugs, repurposed medications, and shorter regimens have radically altered the landscape for treating rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) and multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB). There are multiple ongoing clinical trials aiming to build a robust evidence base to guide RR/MDR-TB treatment, and both observational studies and programmatic data have contributed to advancing the treatment field. In December 2019, the WHO issued their second ‘Rapid Communication´ related to RR-TB management. This reiterated their prior recommendation that a majority of people with RR/MDR-TB receive all-oral treatment regimens, and now allow for specific shorter duration regimens to be used programmatically as well. Many TB programs need clinical advice as they seek to roll out such regimens in their specific setting. In this Perspective, we highlight our early experiences and lessons learned from working with National TB Programs, adult and pediatric clinicians and civil society, in optimizing treatment of RR/MDR-TB, using shorter, highly-effective, oral regimens for the majority of people with RR/MDR-TB.
Journal Article > CommentaryFull Text
J Adolesc Health. 2023 March 1; Volume 72 (Issue 3); 323-331.; DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.10.036
Chiang SS, Waterous PM, Atieno VF, Bernays S, Bondarenko Y, et al.
J Adolesc Health. 2023 March 1; Volume 72 (Issue 3); 323-331.; DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.10.036
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Public Health Action. 2014 December 21; Volume 4 (Issue 4); 243-8.; DOI:10.5588/pha.14.0069
Rusovich V, Kumar AMV, Skrahina A, Hurevich H, Astrauko A, et al.
Public Health Action. 2014 December 21; Volume 4 (Issue 4); 243-8.; DOI:10.5588/pha.14.0069
SETTING
Belarus (Eastern Europe) is facing an epidemic of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). In 2012, rapid molecular diagnostics were prioritised for sputum smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients to diagnose MDR-TB, while pulmonary sputum smear-negative pulmonary TB (SN-PTB) patients were investigated using conventional methods, often delaying the diagnosis of MDR-TB by 2-4 months.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the proportion of MDR-TB among SN-PTB patients registered in 2012 and associated clinical and demographic factors.
DESIGN
Retrospective cohort study using countrywide data from the national electronic TB register.
RESULTS
Of the 5377 TB cases registered, 2960 (55%) were SN-PTB. Of the latter, 1639 (55%) were culture-positive, of whom 768 (47%) had MDR-TB: 33% (363/1084) were new and 73% (405/555) previously treated patients. Previous history of treatment, age, region, urban residence, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status and being a pensioner were independently associated with MDR-TB.
CONCLUSION
About half of culture-positive SN-PTB patients have MDR-TB and this rises to over 7/10 for retreatment cases. A national policy decision to extend rapid molecular diagnostics universally to all PTB patients, including SN-PTB, seems justified. Steps need to be taken to ensure implementation of this urgent priority, given the patient and public health implications of delayed diagnosis.
Belarus (Eastern Europe) is facing an epidemic of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). In 2012, rapid molecular diagnostics were prioritised for sputum smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients to diagnose MDR-TB, while pulmonary sputum smear-negative pulmonary TB (SN-PTB) patients were investigated using conventional methods, often delaying the diagnosis of MDR-TB by 2-4 months.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the proportion of MDR-TB among SN-PTB patients registered in 2012 and associated clinical and demographic factors.
DESIGN
Retrospective cohort study using countrywide data from the national electronic TB register.
RESULTS
Of the 5377 TB cases registered, 2960 (55%) were SN-PTB. Of the latter, 1639 (55%) were culture-positive, of whom 768 (47%) had MDR-TB: 33% (363/1084) were new and 73% (405/555) previously treated patients. Previous history of treatment, age, region, urban residence, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status and being a pensioner were independently associated with MDR-TB.
CONCLUSION
About half of culture-positive SN-PTB patients have MDR-TB and this rises to over 7/10 for retreatment cases. A national policy decision to extend rapid molecular diagnostics universally to all PTB patients, including SN-PTB, seems justified. Steps need to be taken to ensure implementation of this urgent priority, given the patient and public health implications of delayed diagnosis.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2023 December 1; Volume 27 (Issue 12); 885-898.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.23.0341
du Cros PAK, Greig J, Cross GB, Cousins C, Berry C, et al.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2023 December 1; Volume 27 (Issue 12); 885-898.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.23.0341
English
Français
BACKGROUND
The value, speed of completion and robustness of the evidence generated by TB treatment trials could be improved by implementing standards for best practice.
METHODS
A global panel of experts participated in a Delphi process, using a 7-point Likert scale to score and revise draft standards until consensus was reached.
RESULTS
Eleven standards were defined: Standard 1, high quality data on TB regimens are essential to inform clinical and programmatic management; Standard 2, the research questions addressed by TB trials should be relevant to affected communities, who should be included in all trial stages; Standard 3, trials should make every effort to be as inclusive as possible; Standard 4, the most efficient trial designs should be considered to improve the evidence base as quickly and cost effectively as possible, without compromising quality; Standard 5, trial governance should be in line with accepted good clinical practice; Standard 6, trials should investigate and report strategies that promote optimal engagement in care; Standard 7, where possible, TB trials should include pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic components; Standard 8, outcomes should include frequency of disease recurrence and post-treatment sequelae; Standard 9, TB trials should aim to harmonise key outcomes and data structures across studies; Standard 10, TB trials should include biobanking; Standard 11, treatment trials should invest in capacity strengthening of local trial and TB programme staff.
CONCLUSION
These standards should improve the efficiency and effectiveness of evidence generation, as well as the translation of research into policy and practice.
The value, speed of completion and robustness of the evidence generated by TB treatment trials could be improved by implementing standards for best practice.
METHODS
A global panel of experts participated in a Delphi process, using a 7-point Likert scale to score and revise draft standards until consensus was reached.
RESULTS
Eleven standards were defined: Standard 1, high quality data on TB regimens are essential to inform clinical and programmatic management; Standard 2, the research questions addressed by TB trials should be relevant to affected communities, who should be included in all trial stages; Standard 3, trials should make every effort to be as inclusive as possible; Standard 4, the most efficient trial designs should be considered to improve the evidence base as quickly and cost effectively as possible, without compromising quality; Standard 5, trial governance should be in line with accepted good clinical practice; Standard 6, trials should investigate and report strategies that promote optimal engagement in care; Standard 7, where possible, TB trials should include pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic components; Standard 8, outcomes should include frequency of disease recurrence and post-treatment sequelae; Standard 9, TB trials should aim to harmonise key outcomes and data structures across studies; Standard 10, TB trials should include biobanking; Standard 11, treatment trials should invest in capacity strengthening of local trial and TB programme staff.
CONCLUSION
These standards should improve the efficiency and effectiveness of evidence generation, as well as the translation of research into policy and practice.
Journal Article > ReviewFull Text
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 November 17; Volume 195 (Issue 101); 1300-1310.; DOI:10.1164/rccm.201606-1227CI
Harausz EP, Garcia-Prats AJ, Seddon JA, Schaaf HS, Hesseling AC, et al.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 November 17; Volume 195 (Issue 101); 1300-1310.; DOI:10.1164/rccm.201606-1227CI
It is estimated that 33,000 children develop multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) each year. In spite of these numbers, children and adolescents have limited access to the new and repurposed MDR-TB drugs. There is also little clinical guidance for the use of these drugs and for the shorter MDR-TB regimen in the pediatric population. This is despite the fact that these drugs and regimens are associated with improved interim outcomes and acceptable safety profiles in adults. This review fills a gap in the pediatric MDR-TB literature by providing practice-based recommendations for the use of the new (delamanid and bedaquiline) and repurposed (linezolid and clofazimine) MDR-TB drugs and the new shorter MDR-TB regimen in children and adolescents.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Public Health Action. 2014 October 21; Volume 4 (Issue 2); S24-8.; DOI:10.5588/pha.14.0042
Khaliaukin A, Kumar AMV, Skrahina A, Hurevich H, Rusovich V, et al.
Public Health Action. 2014 October 21; Volume 4 (Issue 2); S24-8.; DOI:10.5588/pha.14.0042
SETTINGS
Tuberculosis (TB) health facilities in the Gomel Region, Republic of Belarus-settings with a high burden of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
OBJECTIVE
To determine treatment outcomes among MDR-TB patients diagnosed in 2009-2010 and factors associated with unsuccessful outcomes (death, failure and loss to follow-up).
DESIGN
Retrospective cohort study involving a review of an electronic patient database maintained under the National Tuberculosis Control Programme.
RESULTS
Of 517 patients diagnosed, 78 (15%) did not start treatment. Among 439 patients who started treatment (84% males, median age 45 years, 15% HIV-infected), 291 (66%) had unsuccessful outcomes (35% deaths, 18% treatment failure and 13% lost to follow-up). Multivariate regression analysis showed that patients aged ⩾45 years (aRR 1.2, 95%CI 1.1-1.3), HIV-infected patients and those not receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) (aRR 1.5, 95%CI 1.4-1.6) and those with a previous history of anti-tuberculosis treatment (aRR 1.2, 95%CI 1.1-1.4) had significantly higher risk of unsuccessful outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Treatment outcomes among MDR-TB patients were poor, with high rates of death, failure and loss to follow-up (including pre-treatment loss to follow-up). Urgent measures to increase ART uptake among HIV-infected MDR-TB patients, improved access to second-line anti-tuberculosis drug susceptibility testing and comprehensive patient support measures are required to address this grim situation.
Tuberculosis (TB) health facilities in the Gomel Region, Republic of Belarus-settings with a high burden of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
OBJECTIVE
To determine treatment outcomes among MDR-TB patients diagnosed in 2009-2010 and factors associated with unsuccessful outcomes (death, failure and loss to follow-up).
DESIGN
Retrospective cohort study involving a review of an electronic patient database maintained under the National Tuberculosis Control Programme.
RESULTS
Of 517 patients diagnosed, 78 (15%) did not start treatment. Among 439 patients who started treatment (84% males, median age 45 years, 15% HIV-infected), 291 (66%) had unsuccessful outcomes (35% deaths, 18% treatment failure and 13% lost to follow-up). Multivariate regression analysis showed that patients aged ⩾45 years (aRR 1.2, 95%CI 1.1-1.3), HIV-infected patients and those not receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) (aRR 1.5, 95%CI 1.4-1.6) and those with a previous history of anti-tuberculosis treatment (aRR 1.2, 95%CI 1.1-1.4) had significantly higher risk of unsuccessful outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Treatment outcomes among MDR-TB patients were poor, with high rates of death, failure and loss to follow-up (including pre-treatment loss to follow-up). Urgent measures to increase ART uptake among HIV-infected MDR-TB patients, improved access to second-line anti-tuberculosis drug susceptibility testing and comprehensive patient support measures are required to address this grim situation.
Journal Article > Meta-AnalysisFull Text
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 February 1; Volume 92; DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.042
Migliori GB, Tiberi S, Zumla A, Petersen E, Chakaya JM, et al.
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 February 1; Volume 92; DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.042
The continuous flow of new research articles on MDR-TB diagnosis, treatment, prevention and rehabilitation requires frequent update of existing guidelines. This review is aimed at providing clinicians and public health staff with an updated and easy-to-consult document arising from consensus of Global Tuberculosis Network (GTN) experts. The core published documents and guidelines have been reviewed including the recently published MDR-TB WHO rapid advice and ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA guidelines. After a rapid review of epidemiology and risk factors, the clinical priorities on MDR-TB diagnosis (including whole genome sequencing and drug-susceptibility testing interpretations) and treatment (treatment design and management, TB in children) are discussed. Furthermore, the review comprehensively describes the latest information on contact tracing and LTBI management in MDR-TB contacts, while providing guidance on post-treatment functional evaluation and rehabilitation of TB sequelae, infection control and other public health priorities.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2023 August 1; Volume 27 (Issue 8); 584-598.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.23.0085
Chiang SS, Graham SM, Schaaf HS, Marais BJ, Sant’Anna CC, et al.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2023 August 1; Volume 27 (Issue 8); 584-598.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.23.0085
BACKGROUND
These clinical standards aim to provide guidance for diagnosis, treatment, and management of drug-susceptible TB in children and adolescents.
METHODS
Fifty-two global experts in paediatric TB participated in a Delphi consensus process. After eight rounds of revisions, 51/52 (98%) participants endorsed the final document.
RESULTS
Eight standards were identified: Standard 1, Age and developmental stage are critical considerations in the assessment and management of TB; Standard 2, Children and adolescents with symptoms and signs of TB disease should undergo prompt evaluation, and diagnosis and treatment initiation should not depend on microbiological confirmation; Standard 3, Treatment initiation is particularly urgent in children and adolescents with presumptive TB meningitis and disseminated (miliary) TB; Standard 4, Children and adolescents should be treated with an appropriate weight-based regimen; Standard 5, Treating TB infection (TBI) is important to prevent disease; Standard 6, Children and adolescents should receive home-based/community-based treatment support whenever possible; Standard 7, Children, adolescents, and their families should be provided age-appropriate support to optimise engagement in care and clinical outcomes; and Standard 8, Case reporting and contact tracing should be conducted for each child and adolescent.
CONCLUSION
These consensus-based clinical standards, which should be adapted to local contexts, will improve the care of children and adolescents affected by TB.
These clinical standards aim to provide guidance for diagnosis, treatment, and management of drug-susceptible TB in children and adolescents.
METHODS
Fifty-two global experts in paediatric TB participated in a Delphi consensus process. After eight rounds of revisions, 51/52 (98%) participants endorsed the final document.
RESULTS
Eight standards were identified: Standard 1, Age and developmental stage are critical considerations in the assessment and management of TB; Standard 2, Children and adolescents with symptoms and signs of TB disease should undergo prompt evaluation, and diagnosis and treatment initiation should not depend on microbiological confirmation; Standard 3, Treatment initiation is particularly urgent in children and adolescents with presumptive TB meningitis and disseminated (miliary) TB; Standard 4, Children and adolescents should be treated with an appropriate weight-based regimen; Standard 5, Treating TB infection (TBI) is important to prevent disease; Standard 6, Children and adolescents should receive home-based/community-based treatment support whenever possible; Standard 7, Children, adolescents, and their families should be provided age-appropriate support to optimise engagement in care and clinical outcomes; and Standard 8, Case reporting and contact tracing should be conducted for each child and adolescent.
CONCLUSION
These consensus-based clinical standards, which should be adapted to local contexts, will improve the care of children and adolescents affected by TB.
Journal Article > Meta-AnalysisFull Text
PLOS Med. 2018 July 11; Volume 15 (Issue 7); e1002591.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002591
Harausz EP, Garcia-Prats AJ, Law S, Schaaf HS, Kredo T, et al.
PLOS Med. 2018 July 11; Volume 15 (Issue 7); e1002591.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002591