Conference Material > Poster
Abdullah N, Ameen T, Albdulwasa'a R, Alkholidy GC, Shoaib M
MSF Paediatric Days 2022. 29 November 2022; DOI:10.57740/ayzy-ej78
Conference Material > Abstract
Oza S, Harris P, Ansbro E, Perel P, Frieden M, et al.
MSF Scientific Days International 2020: Research. 20 May 2020
INTRODUCTION
Globally, hypertension is responsible for approximately half of all heart disease and stroke deaths. Over 75% of these deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. However globally, hypertension awareness, treatment, and control remain low (39%, 29%, and 10%, respectively). Reasons for poor control are multifactorial, and include patient-specific factors such as poor adherence, often associated with high pill-burden regimens. Health system factors are also important and may include the use of complex algorithms, leading to clinical inertia amongst healthcare workers. Fixed-dose combination (FDC) medications may be one way of reducing pill burden and simplifying clinical algorithms. To understand the use of multiple drug classes in the management of hypertension we analysed antihypertensive prescribing patterns and blood pressure (BP) control in cohorts from MSF treatment programmes in Jordan and Zimbabwe to determine the proportion of patients who may benefit from a FDC (those currently treated with more than two drug classes) and the potential extent of clinical inertia.
METHODS
We used routine, retrospective data from two cohorts of adult patients with hypertension; one from Jordan, a semi-urban clinic managed by doctors (using data from October 2016 to December 2018) and one from Zimbabwe, a rural setting managed by nurses (data from May 2016 to July 2019). We carried out descriptive analyses of prescribing patterns and their relationship with BP control.
Ethics
This study was approved by the ethics committees of Jordan and Zimbabwe and the MSF Ethics Review Board.
RESULTS
We analysed data from 3305 and 3957 hypertensive patients from Jordan and Zimbabwe respectively; with median ages in Jordan 61 (interquartile range, IQR, 53-69) and in Zimbabwe 63 (IQR 53-70); the majority were female (62.7% and 80.4% respectively). Retention and BP control at 12 months were 95% and 77% (Jordan) and 59% and 42.3% (Zimbabwe). The proportion of patients on two, three, or four-five antihypertensive drug classes at baseline were 42%, 19%, 4% in Jordan and 46%, 7%, <1% in Zimbabwe. At 12 months follow-up, proportions were 40%, 28%, 11% in Jordan and 46%, 17%, 1% in Zimbabwe. Proportions with controlled BP at 12 months on two, three, or four-five drug classes were 71%, 64% and 55% in Jordan, and 40%, 27%, 25% in Zimbabwe. No medication change for uncontrolled BP was made at the next visit for 1,843 (79.3%) of 2,325 visits in Jordan, and 4,763 (63.5%) of 7,497 visits in Zimbabwe. This included 545 (28.6%) and 2,549 (53.5%) visits with uncontrolled stage two or three hypertension respectively.
CONCLUSION
Most patients with hypertension required more than two antihypertensive medications, but a significant proportion persisted with uncontrolled BP. No additional class of antihypertensive was given in the majority of visits by patients with uncontrolled BP, suggesting possible clinical inertia by healthcare workers. Despite recent inclusion of FDC’s in MSF guidelines and WHO’s Essential Medicines List, their lack of inclusion in national guidelines, and procurement challenges, have hindered MSF’s implementation of FDC’s. Demonstrating feasibility of FDC use in MSF pilot projects could play an important role in furthering uptake.
Conflicts of Interest
None declared.
Globally, hypertension is responsible for approximately half of all heart disease and stroke deaths. Over 75% of these deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. However globally, hypertension awareness, treatment, and control remain low (39%, 29%, and 10%, respectively). Reasons for poor control are multifactorial, and include patient-specific factors such as poor adherence, often associated with high pill-burden regimens. Health system factors are also important and may include the use of complex algorithms, leading to clinical inertia amongst healthcare workers. Fixed-dose combination (FDC) medications may be one way of reducing pill burden and simplifying clinical algorithms. To understand the use of multiple drug classes in the management of hypertension we analysed antihypertensive prescribing patterns and blood pressure (BP) control in cohorts from MSF treatment programmes in Jordan and Zimbabwe to determine the proportion of patients who may benefit from a FDC (those currently treated with more than two drug classes) and the potential extent of clinical inertia.
METHODS
We used routine, retrospective data from two cohorts of adult patients with hypertension; one from Jordan, a semi-urban clinic managed by doctors (using data from October 2016 to December 2018) and one from Zimbabwe, a rural setting managed by nurses (data from May 2016 to July 2019). We carried out descriptive analyses of prescribing patterns and their relationship with BP control.
Ethics
This study was approved by the ethics committees of Jordan and Zimbabwe and the MSF Ethics Review Board.
RESULTS
We analysed data from 3305 and 3957 hypertensive patients from Jordan and Zimbabwe respectively; with median ages in Jordan 61 (interquartile range, IQR, 53-69) and in Zimbabwe 63 (IQR 53-70); the majority were female (62.7% and 80.4% respectively). Retention and BP control at 12 months were 95% and 77% (Jordan) and 59% and 42.3% (Zimbabwe). The proportion of patients on two, three, or four-five antihypertensive drug classes at baseline were 42%, 19%, 4% in Jordan and 46%, 7%, <1% in Zimbabwe. At 12 months follow-up, proportions were 40%, 28%, 11% in Jordan and 46%, 17%, 1% in Zimbabwe. Proportions with controlled BP at 12 months on two, three, or four-five drug classes were 71%, 64% and 55% in Jordan, and 40%, 27%, 25% in Zimbabwe. No medication change for uncontrolled BP was made at the next visit for 1,843 (79.3%) of 2,325 visits in Jordan, and 4,763 (63.5%) of 7,497 visits in Zimbabwe. This included 545 (28.6%) and 2,549 (53.5%) visits with uncontrolled stage two or three hypertension respectively.
CONCLUSION
Most patients with hypertension required more than two antihypertensive medications, but a significant proportion persisted with uncontrolled BP. No additional class of antihypertensive was given in the majority of visits by patients with uncontrolled BP, suggesting possible clinical inertia by healthcare workers. Despite recent inclusion of FDC’s in MSF guidelines and WHO’s Essential Medicines List, their lack of inclusion in national guidelines, and procurement challenges, have hindered MSF’s implementation of FDC’s. Demonstrating feasibility of FDC use in MSF pilot projects could play an important role in furthering uptake.
Conflicts of Interest
None declared.
Protocol > Research Protocol
Rehr M, Shoaib M, Deprade A, Lenglet AD, Ait-Bouziad I, et al.
4 April 2016
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES
• To determine the level of access to health care services for Syrian refugees living out-of-camp in Irbid governorate, Jordan.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES
• To describe the socio-demographic characteristics of the surveyed population including age, gender, disabilities, time living in Jordan, living conditions, and legal status
• To describe the economic situation of the surveyed households with regards to income & income sources, dependency on humanitarian assistance, household expenditures and direct and indirect expenditures on health
• To characterize health care utilization of non-camp Syrian refugees including frequency & type of services used as well as the main reasons for requiring medical care
• To estimate coverage with the most crucial health services such as vaccination coverage of under 5-year-old children, coverage with services for non-communicable diseases and maternal health coverage.
• To estimate the coverage of MSF services including specifically NCD care as well as ANC and child health care
• To estimate health service needs by estimating the household- prevalence of NCDs as well as the birth rate.
• To identify barriers to accessing general-, as well as specialized health care services with regards to economic constraints, barriers resulting from knowledge gaps as well as limitations in accessibility and/or acceptability of existing services.
• To identify risk factors for not accessing general and specialized health services as needed.
• To estimate retrospectively the crude mortality rate (CMR) and specific mortality rates for the total population and for children under five years of age (U5MR).
• To determine the level of access to health care services for Syrian refugees living out-of-camp in Irbid governorate, Jordan.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES
• To describe the socio-demographic characteristics of the surveyed population including age, gender, disabilities, time living in Jordan, living conditions, and legal status
• To describe the economic situation of the surveyed households with regards to income & income sources, dependency on humanitarian assistance, household expenditures and direct and indirect expenditures on health
• To characterize health care utilization of non-camp Syrian refugees including frequency & type of services used as well as the main reasons for requiring medical care
• To estimate coverage with the most crucial health services such as vaccination coverage of under 5-year-old children, coverage with services for non-communicable diseases and maternal health coverage.
• To estimate the coverage of MSF services including specifically NCD care as well as ANC and child health care
• To estimate health service needs by estimating the household- prevalence of NCDs as well as the birth rate.
• To identify barriers to accessing general-, as well as specialized health care services with regards to economic constraints, barriers resulting from knowledge gaps as well as limitations in accessibility and/or acceptability of existing services.
• To identify risk factors for not accessing general and specialized health services as needed.
• To estimate retrospectively the crude mortality rate (CMR) and specific mortality rates for the total population and for children under five years of age (U5MR).
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
BMC Infect Dis. 22 May 2018; Volume 18 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1186/s12879-018-3149-y
Alga A, Wong S, Shoaib M, Lundgren KC, Giske CG, et al.
BMC Infect Dis. 22 May 2018; Volume 18 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1186/s12879-018-3149-y
Armed conflicts are a major contributor to injury and death globally. Conflict-related injuries are associated with a high risk of wound infection, but it is unknown to what extent infection directly relates to sustainment of life and restoration of function. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome and resource consumption among civilians receiving acute surgical treatment due to conflict-related injuries. Patients with and without wound infections were compared.
Journal Article > CommentaryFull Text
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 17 June 2021; Volume 15 (Issue 6); e0009437.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0009437
Farley ES, Ariti C, Amirtharajah M, Kamu C, Oluyide B, et al.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 17 June 2021; Volume 15 (Issue 6); e0009437.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0009437
Journal Article > CommentaryFull Text
Trop Med Int Health. 3 June 2021; Volume 26 (Issue 9); 1088-1097.; DOI:10.1111/tmi.13630
Isah S, Amirtharajah M, Farley ES, Adetunji AS, Samuel J, et al.
Trop Med Int Health. 3 June 2021; Volume 26 (Issue 9); 1088-1097.; DOI:10.1111/tmi.13630
The Nigerian Ministry of Health has been offering care for noma patients for many years at the Noma Children's Hospital (NCH) in Sokoto, northwest Nigeria, and Médecins Sans Frontières has supported these initiatives since 2014. The comprehensive model of care consists of four main components: acute care, care for noma sequelae, integrated hospital-based services and community-based services. The model of care is based on the limited evidence available for prevention and treatment of noma and follows WHO's protocols for acute patients and best practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of noma survivors. The model is updated continually as new evidence becomes available, including evidence generated through the operational research studies performed at NCH. By describing the model of care, we wish to share the lessons learned with other actors working in the noma and neglected tropical disease sphere in the hope of guiding programme development.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
BMC Health Serv Res. 21 February 2014; Volume 14 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-14-81
Horter SCB, Stringer B, Reynolds L, Shoaib M, Kasozi S, et al.
BMC Health Serv Res. 21 February 2014; Volume 14 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-14-81
Ambulatory, community-based care for multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) has been found to be effective in multiple settings with high cure rates. However, little is known about patient preferences around models of MDR-TB care. Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) has delivered home-based MDR-TB treatment in the rural Kitgum and Lamwo districts of northern Uganda since 2009 in collaboration with the Ministry of Health and the National TB and Leprosy Programme. We conducted a qualitative study examining the experience of patients and key stakeholders of home-based MDR-TB treatment.
Conference Material > Abstract
Briskin E, Smith JS, Caleo GNC, Lenglet AD, Pearlman J, et al.
MSF Scientific Days International 2021: Research. 18 May 2021
INTRODUCTION
In April 2020, “shielding” (separate living spaces with enhanced infection control support for groups at high risk of severe COVID-19 disease) was proposed for COVID-19 prevention in settings where lockdown is not feasible (i.e. displaced persons camps). MSF used qualitative methods to explore community perceptions of shielding and other potential COVID-19 prevention measures applicable in settings where it works. Nigeria and Sierra Leone served as initial pilot sites for this multi-site study that ultimately included 13 countries.
METHODS
We carried out qualitative assessments between April and August 2020 within 9 MSF-supported sites in Nigeria and Sierra Leone, with the aim of exploring community perceptions of potential COVID-19 prevention measures. Sites in Nigeria included internally displaced camps in two states, and in Sierra Leone, an open village setting. We conducted multiple rounds of participant-led individual in-depth qualitative interviews in the study sites between April-August 2020. We recruited participants purposively, ensuring participants recruited were representative of underlying demographic and ethnic diversity. Data were coded by hand on paper copies of transcripts and in NVivo12 and analyzed for key themes. Findings were built on through iteration with participants.
ETHICS
This study was approved by the MSF Ethics Review Board and by the Ethical Review Boards of Benue State, Nigeria, Zamfara State, Nigeria, and the District Health Management team,
Tonkolilli, Sierra Leone.
RESULTS
Participants reported that access to both COVID-19 and non- COVID-19 care was challenging due to fear of infection and practical difficulties attending care facilities. Key priorities noted
by participants included obtaining food, masks and handwashing, and continuing to get access to non-COVID-19 healthcare. In Nigeria, shielding (providing separate dwellings for high-risk
people) was described as a challenge.
Reasons for this included close living conditions affecting practicality, its impact on mental health, and the community’s inter-generational reliance. Shielding was only seen as feasible
with sustained provision of resources for shielded persons including COVID testing, food from the family, mobile phones, and socially distanced visitation. For Sierra Leone, previous
experiences (e.g. war, Ebola) influenced fears of separation and the possibility of infection from contact with strangers and health workers or health facilities. Lockdowns and school
closures have a negative effect on support networks and local economies, and in Sierra Leone increased the perceived risk of sexual and gender-based violence and exploitation. Participants reported the desire for self-management of contact tracing and transmission prevention activities within their communities. Context-specific activities to address these priorities were implemented in response.
CONCLUSION
The community-based feedback provided a better understanding of attitudes towards and feasibility of COVID-19 control measures. Commonalities were reported across sites, while
differences in findings across sites highlighted the importance of context-specific engagement. Early and continued community engagement allowed context-specific activities to address these priorities to be implemented in partnership with communities in response. Implemented activities included enhancement of handwashing points, subsidizing locally-produced cloth masks, and reinforcement of prevention and control for non-COVID diseases such as malaria.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
None declared.
In April 2020, “shielding” (separate living spaces with enhanced infection control support for groups at high risk of severe COVID-19 disease) was proposed for COVID-19 prevention in settings where lockdown is not feasible (i.e. displaced persons camps). MSF used qualitative methods to explore community perceptions of shielding and other potential COVID-19 prevention measures applicable in settings where it works. Nigeria and Sierra Leone served as initial pilot sites for this multi-site study that ultimately included 13 countries.
METHODS
We carried out qualitative assessments between April and August 2020 within 9 MSF-supported sites in Nigeria and Sierra Leone, with the aim of exploring community perceptions of potential COVID-19 prevention measures. Sites in Nigeria included internally displaced camps in two states, and in Sierra Leone, an open village setting. We conducted multiple rounds of participant-led individual in-depth qualitative interviews in the study sites between April-August 2020. We recruited participants purposively, ensuring participants recruited were representative of underlying demographic and ethnic diversity. Data were coded by hand on paper copies of transcripts and in NVivo12 and analyzed for key themes. Findings were built on through iteration with participants.
ETHICS
This study was approved by the MSF Ethics Review Board and by the Ethical Review Boards of Benue State, Nigeria, Zamfara State, Nigeria, and the District Health Management team,
Tonkolilli, Sierra Leone.
RESULTS
Participants reported that access to both COVID-19 and non- COVID-19 care was challenging due to fear of infection and practical difficulties attending care facilities. Key priorities noted
by participants included obtaining food, masks and handwashing, and continuing to get access to non-COVID-19 healthcare. In Nigeria, shielding (providing separate dwellings for high-risk
people) was described as a challenge.
Reasons for this included close living conditions affecting practicality, its impact on mental health, and the community’s inter-generational reliance. Shielding was only seen as feasible
with sustained provision of resources for shielded persons including COVID testing, food from the family, mobile phones, and socially distanced visitation. For Sierra Leone, previous
experiences (e.g. war, Ebola) influenced fears of separation and the possibility of infection from contact with strangers and health workers or health facilities. Lockdowns and school
closures have a negative effect on support networks and local economies, and in Sierra Leone increased the perceived risk of sexual and gender-based violence and exploitation. Participants reported the desire for self-management of contact tracing and transmission prevention activities within their communities. Context-specific activities to address these priorities were implemented in response.
CONCLUSION
The community-based feedback provided a better understanding of attitudes towards and feasibility of COVID-19 control measures. Commonalities were reported across sites, while
differences in findings across sites highlighted the importance of context-specific engagement. Early and continued community engagement allowed context-specific activities to address these priorities to be implemented in partnership with communities in response. Implemented activities included enhancement of handwashing points, subsidizing locally-produced cloth masks, and reinforcement of prevention and control for non-COVID diseases such as malaria.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
None declared.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Confl Health. 11 July 2018; Volume 12; 33.; DOI:10.1186/s13031-018-0168-7
Rehr M, Shoaib M, Ellithy S, Okour S, Ariti C, et al.
Confl Health. 11 July 2018; Volume 12; 33.; DOI:10.1186/s13031-018-0168-7
BACKGROUND
Tackling the high non-communicable disease (NCD) burden among Syrian refugees poses a challenge to humanitarian actors and host countries. Current response priorities are the identification and integration of key interventions for NCD care into humanitarian programs as well as sustainable financing. To provide evidence for effective NCD intervention planning, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among non-camp Syrian refugees in northern Jordan to investigate the burden and determinants for high NCDs prevalence and NCD multi-morbidities and assess the access to NCD care.
METHODS
We used a two-stage cluster design with 329 randomly selected clusters and eight households identified through snowball sampling. Consenting households were interviewed about self-reported NCDs, NCD service utilization, and barriers to care. We estimated the adult prevalence of hypertension, diabetes type I/II, cardiovascular- and chronic respiratory conditions, thyroid disease and cancer and analysed the pattern of NCD multi-morbidities. We used the Cox proportional hazard model to calculate the prevalence ratios (PR) to analyse determinants for NCD prevalence and logistic regression to determine risk factors for NCD multi-morbidities by calculating odds ratios (ORs).
RESULTS
Among 8041 adults, 21.8%, (95% CI: 20.9-22.8) suffered from at least one NCD; hypertension (14.0, 95% CI: 13.2-14.8) and diabetes (9.2, 95% CI: 8.5-9.9) were the most prevalent NCDs. NCD multi-morbidities were reported by 44.7% (95% CI: 42.4-47.0) of patients. Higher age was associated with higher NCD prevalence and the risk for NCD-multi-morbidities; education was inversely associated. Of those patients who needed NCD care, 23.0% (95% CI: 20.5-25.6) did not seek it; 61.5% (95% CI: 54.7-67.9) cited provider cost as the main barrier. An NCD medication interruption was reported by 23.1% (95% CI: 20-4-26.1) of patients with regular medication needs; predominant reason was unaffordability (63.4, 95% CI: 56.7-69.6).
CONCLUSION
The burden of NCDs and multi-morbidities is high among Syrian refugees in northern Jordan. Elderly and those with a lower education are key target groups for NCD prevention and care, which informs NCD service planning and developing patient-centred approaches. Important unmet needs for NCD care exist; removing the main barriers to care could include cost-reduction for medications through humanitarian pricing models. Nevertheless, it is still essential that international donors agencies and countries fulfill their commitment to support the Syrian-crisis response.
Tackling the high non-communicable disease (NCD) burden among Syrian refugees poses a challenge to humanitarian actors and host countries. Current response priorities are the identification and integration of key interventions for NCD care into humanitarian programs as well as sustainable financing. To provide evidence for effective NCD intervention planning, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among non-camp Syrian refugees in northern Jordan to investigate the burden and determinants for high NCDs prevalence and NCD multi-morbidities and assess the access to NCD care.
METHODS
We used a two-stage cluster design with 329 randomly selected clusters and eight households identified through snowball sampling. Consenting households were interviewed about self-reported NCDs, NCD service utilization, and barriers to care. We estimated the adult prevalence of hypertension, diabetes type I/II, cardiovascular- and chronic respiratory conditions, thyroid disease and cancer and analysed the pattern of NCD multi-morbidities. We used the Cox proportional hazard model to calculate the prevalence ratios (PR) to analyse determinants for NCD prevalence and logistic regression to determine risk factors for NCD multi-morbidities by calculating odds ratios (ORs).
RESULTS
Among 8041 adults, 21.8%, (95% CI: 20.9-22.8) suffered from at least one NCD; hypertension (14.0, 95% CI: 13.2-14.8) and diabetes (9.2, 95% CI: 8.5-9.9) were the most prevalent NCDs. NCD multi-morbidities were reported by 44.7% (95% CI: 42.4-47.0) of patients. Higher age was associated with higher NCD prevalence and the risk for NCD-multi-morbidities; education was inversely associated. Of those patients who needed NCD care, 23.0% (95% CI: 20.5-25.6) did not seek it; 61.5% (95% CI: 54.7-67.9) cited provider cost as the main barrier. An NCD medication interruption was reported by 23.1% (95% CI: 20-4-26.1) of patients with regular medication needs; predominant reason was unaffordability (63.4, 95% CI: 56.7-69.6).
CONCLUSION
The burden of NCDs and multi-morbidities is high among Syrian refugees in northern Jordan. Elderly and those with a lower education are key target groups for NCD prevention and care, which informs NCD service planning and developing patient-centred approaches. Important unmet needs for NCD care exist; removing the main barriers to care could include cost-reduction for medications through humanitarian pricing models. Nevertheless, it is still essential that international donors agencies and countries fulfill their commitment to support the Syrian-crisis response.
Conference Material > Slide Presentation
Briskin E, Smith JS, Caleo GNC, Lenglet AD, Pearlman J, et al.
MSF Scientific Days International 2021: Research. 18 May 2021