INTRODUCTION
Guinea’s Ministry of Health has proposed a standardized national community health program, including health promotion, case management, and referral; historically however the system has been implemented piecemeal by various actors. MSF has been present in Kouroussa, northern Guinea, since 2017. MSF activities there have been focused on community healthcare, through training and support for community health workers, or “recos”. Before exiting, MSF conducted a mixed-methods study to understand differences in the models and effects of MSF community health program, as compared to those implemented by other actors.
METHODS
We implemented an explanatory, sequential, mixed-methods study in Kouroussa and in three other zones, Mandiana, Télimélé, and Boussou; sites were selected to represent a diversity of situations, and those outside Kouroussa are supported by non-MSF actors. During the quantitative phase, 137 recos and 13 supervisory community health agents were interviewed about their demographic and professional details, availability of tools, the package of activities, activity levels, and practical knowledge. A qualitative phase, including 24 focus group discussions and 65 individual interviews followed, aiming to better understand the community and local health professional perceptions of community health programmes in each of the four zones. Quantitative data were analyzed using R (Vienna, Austria) to calculate descriptive measures; differences were compared between zones using chi-square and t-tests. Qualitative data audio recordings were translated and transcribed, read, and re-read to identify codes and themes.
ETHICS
This study was approved by the MSF Ethics Review Board and by the Comité National de la Recherche, Guinea.
RESULTS
Overall, recos in Mandiana and Télimélé were primarily involved in health promotion and referral, while recos in Kouroussa (supported by MSF), and some in Boussou, additionally conducted case management. In Kouroussa, recos conducted a median of 16.5 malaria consultations per month, compared to 8.0 in Boussou, 2.1 in Télimélé, and 0 in Mandiana (p<0.0005). The zones where recos conducted case management were those where medicines were more available, with 92% of recos in Kouroussa possessing anti-malarials at the time of visit, compared to 38% in Boussou, 3% in Télimélé, and 7% in Mandiana (p<0.0005). Qualitative data revealed that for recos to expand from health promotion into case management, medicines must be available, and in Kouroussa the community emphasized the importance of free care. Moreover, qualitative data showed the primary motivation for recos was their loyalty to their community, and that recos were better accepted and more effective when they came from the same community they served, or were a “child” of the village.
CONCLUSION
To consistently achieve stated national ambitions of having recos that conduct case management, including in Kouroussa after MSF exits, medicine availability must be assured through appropriate resourcing. Additionally, our data suggest that each community should continue to have the power to choose their own reco.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
None declared.
En 2015, Médecins Sans Frontières a ouvert un Centre de Traumatologie Arche Kigobe à Bujumbura, Burundi, pour prise en charge des victimes des violences, et a élargi en 2016 les critères d’admission aux brûlures, sans unité spécialisé pour leur prise en charge.
OBJECTIF
Etudier les facteurs associés à une issue défavorable (décès, référés, et sortis contre avis médical), chez les brûlés hospitalisés dans ce centre.
MÉTHODE
Ceci est étude descriptive et analytique rétrospective des patients brûlés hospitalisés
RÉSULTATS
De 2016 à 2020, 477 patients ont été hospitalisés au Centre pour brûlure, dont 301 (63%) avaient moins de 5 ans, 169 (35%) étaient de sexe féminin, et 48 (10%) avaient une issue défavorable. L’anémie (OR 11 ; IC 95% 2,7–48), l’infection (OR 11 ; IC 95% 5,7–22), et l’inhalation de fumée (OR 28 ; IC 95% 7–111), étaient parmi les principaux facteurs associés à une issue défavorable.
CONCLUSION
Même dans les contextes à ressources limitées, pour minimiser les issues défavorables liés à l’inhalation et l’infection chez les brûlés, un circuit d’isolement septique, la formation, un service de bactériologie, et les appareils de ventilation en pression positive continue pourraient être mis en place.
Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) is known for its work providing surgical care for victims of violent trauma (VT) in conflict zones. However, the trauma centers also deal with road traffic accidents (RTAs) which may require different staffing, facilities and supplies as compared with those required for VT. This study aimed to compare differences in types of injuries, clinical outcomes, and resources needed to properly operate trauma centers in low and middle-income countries.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This was a retrospective analysis of routine program data of >70,000 patient presentations in the emergency, in-patient, and operating departments of 2 of MSF’s major trauma centers, in Kunduz (Afghanistan) and Bujumbura (Burundi), using data from 2011 to 2018.
RESULTS
RTAs comprised a significant proportion of overall presentations to these centers (23% in Kunduz and 56% in Bujumbura). RTA patients presented with different patterns of injury, with higher rates of fractures, extremity injuries, and traumatic brain injury. RTA patients were 2.3 times more likely to have a peripheral injury (extremities and head) as VT patients, and 12.5 times more likely to undergo an orthopedic procedure. VT patients had higher rates of abdominal injury. However, there was no statistically significant difference in overall mortality and length of stay between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrates that trauma centers, even in zones of conflict, need to be prepared and resourced to manage RTA cases. Policy-makers in such centers should be aware of the different injury patterns associated with this patient group and have appropriate, sustainable capacity to manage RTA trauma, particularly in terms of management of orthopedic injuries.
Dans un pays d’Afrique émaillé de violences de guerre, Médecins Sans Frontières appui deux hôpitaux régionaux de références, pour répondre aux urgences incluant le traitement des traumatismes par arme-à-feu. Il facilite l’accès aux soins et références qui sont régulièrement entravés pour des raisons non médicales.
OBJECTIF
Déterminer les facteurs influençant l’issue défavorable des cas référés pour traumatisme par arme-à-feu (décembre 2020–novembre 2021).
TYPE D’ÉTUDE
Ceci est une étude transversale utilisant des données collectées de routine.
RÉSULTATS
Au total, 381 patients, victimes de traumatisme par arme-à-feu étaient admis avec une moyenne d’âge de 29 ans ; 28,3% étaient des lésions des gravités sévères dont les lésions thoraco-abdominale et les fractures. La mortalité était 4,9% et les sortis contre-avis médical 7,9%. Les patients d’affiliation force irrégulière représentaient 45,4%, et avaient deux sur trois fois une référence non-aboutie pour des raisons non-médicales. Les patients avec des lésions sévères au triage : l’affiliation, force irrégulière et armée régulière avaient respectivement 2 (P < 0,01), 5,9 (P < 0,01) et 8,1 (P < 0,01) fois plus de risque d’avoir une issue défavorable.
CONCLUSION
Les cas graves causés par des blessures par arme-à-feu risquaient d’avoir plus d’une issue défavorable. Ceci était amplifié pour ceux d’une certaine affiliation, qui se voyaient plus souvent refuser l’accès aux soins de référence supérieur plutôt basé sur des raisons sociopolitiques que sur des raisons médicales.
In April 2020, “shielding” (separate living spaces with enhanced infection control support for groups at high risk of severe COVID-19 disease) was proposed for COVID-19 prevention in settings where lockdown is not feasible (i.e. displaced persons camps). MSF used qualitative methods to explore community perceptions of shielding and other potential COVID-19 prevention measures applicable in settings where it works. Nigeria and Sierra Leone served as initial pilot sites for this multi-site study that ultimately included 13 countries.
METHODS
We carried out qualitative assessments between April and August 2020 within 9 MSF-supported sites in Nigeria and Sierra Leone, with the aim of exploring community perceptions of potential COVID-19 prevention measures. Sites in Nigeria included internally displaced camps in two states, and in Sierra Leone, an open village setting. We conducted multiple rounds of participant-led individual in-depth qualitative interviews in the study sites between April-August 2020. We recruited participants purposively, ensuring participants recruited were representative of underlying demographic and ethnic diversity. Data were coded by hand on paper copies of transcripts and in NVivo12 and analyzed for key themes. Findings were built on through iteration with participants.
ETHICS
This study was approved by the MSF Ethics Review Board and by the Ethical Review Boards of Benue State, Nigeria, Zamfara State, Nigeria, and the District Health Management team,
Tonkolilli, Sierra Leone.
RESULTS
Participants reported that access to both COVID-19 and non- COVID-19 care was challenging due to fear of infection and practical difficulties attending care facilities. Key priorities noted
by participants included obtaining food, masks and handwashing, and continuing to get access to non-COVID-19 healthcare. In Nigeria, shielding (providing separate dwellings for high-risk
people) was described as a challenge.
Reasons for this included close living conditions affecting practicality, its impact on mental health, and the community’s inter-generational reliance. Shielding was only seen as feasible
with sustained provision of resources for shielded persons including COVID testing, food from the family, mobile phones, and socially distanced visitation. For Sierra Leone, previous
experiences (e.g. war, Ebola) influenced fears of separation and the possibility of infection from contact with strangers and health workers or health facilities. Lockdowns and school
closures have a negative effect on support networks and local economies, and in Sierra Leone increased the perceived risk of sexual and gender-based violence and exploitation. Participants reported the desire for self-management of contact tracing and transmission prevention activities within their communities. Context-specific activities to address these priorities were implemented in response.
CONCLUSION
The community-based feedback provided a better understanding of attitudes towards and feasibility of COVID-19 control measures. Commonalities were reported across sites, while
differences in findings across sites highlighted the importance of context-specific engagement. Early and continued community engagement allowed context-specific activities to address these priorities to be implemented in partnership with communities in response. Implemented activities included enhancement of handwashing points, subsidizing locally-produced cloth masks, and reinforcement of prevention and control for non-COVID diseases such as malaria.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
None declared.
Breastfeeding (BF) should be protected, promoted, and supported for all infants in humanitarian settings. The re-establishment of exclusive BF is also a central part of the management of acutely malnourished infants under 6 months (<6 m). Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) runs a nutrition project in Maiduguri, a protracted emergency setting in North-East Nigeria. This study aimed to explore caregivers' (CGs) and health workers' (HWs) perceptions of BF practice, promotion, and support among CGs with infants <6 m in this setting.
METHODS
We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions combined with non-participant observations. Participants included CGs of young infants enrolled in MSF nutritional programs or who attended health promotion activities in a displacement camp. MSF HWs were involved at different levels in BF promotion and support. Data were collected involving a local translator and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis directly from audio recordings.
RESULTS
Participants described how feeding practices are shaped by family, community, and traditional beliefs. The perception of breastmilk insufficiency was common and led to early supplementary feeding with inexpensive but unsuitable products. Participants often linked insufficient breastmilk production with poor maternal nutrition and stress, in a context shaped by conflict and food insecurity. BF promotion was generally well received but could be improved if tailored to address specific barriers to exclusive BF. Interviewed CGs positively valued BF support received as part of the comprehensive treatment for infant malnutrition. One of the main challenges identified was the length of stay at the facility. Some participants perceived that improvements in BF were at risk of being lost after discharge if CGs lacked an enabling environment for BF.
CONCLUSION
This study corroborates the strong influence of household and contextual factors on the practice, promotion, and support of BF. Despite identified challenges, the provision of BF support contributes to improvements in BF practice and was positively perceived by CGs in the studied setting. Greater attention should be directed toward providing support and follow-up for infants <6 m and their CGs in the community.