Menu

HomeConferencesCollectionsCalls for PapersMSF Research EthicsClinical Case ReportingAboutMy Saved Content
Logo

Science Portal

  • My Saved Content
  • Browse All
  • Conferences
  • Collections
  • Calls for Papers
  • MSF Research Ethics
  • Clinical Case Reporting
  • About
English
logo
Science Portal
Copyright © Médecins Sans Frontières
v2.1.prod.produseast1
About MSF Science Portal
About
Contact Us
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Export All Citations
Copyright © Médecins Sans Frontières
v2.1.prod.produseast1
Journal Article
|Research

Direct observation (DO) for drug-resistant tuberculosis: Do we really DO?

Benbaba S, Isaakidis P, Das M, Jadhav S, Reid T, Furin J
Download

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Directly-observed therapy (DOT) is recommended for drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) patients during their entire treatment duration. However, there is limited published evidence on implementation of direct observation (DO) in the field. This study aims to detail whether DO was followed with DR-TB patients in a Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) tuberculosis program in Mumbai, India.


METHODS

This was a cross-sectional, mixed-methods study. Existing qualitative data from a purposively-selected subset of 12 patients, 5 DOT-providers and 5 family members, were assessed in order to determine how DO was implemented. A questionnaire-based survey of DR-TB patients, their DOT-providers and MSF staff was completed between June and August 2014. Patients were defined as"following Strict DO" and "following DO" if a DOT-provider had seen the patient swallow his/her medications "every day" or "most of the days" respectively. If DO was not followed, reasons were also recorded. The qualitative data were analysed for theme and content and used to supplement the questionnaire-based data.


RESULTS

A total of 70 DR-TB patients, 65 DOT-providers and 21 MSF health staff were included. Fifty-five per cent of the patients were HIV-co-infected and 41% had multidrug-resistant-TB plus additional resistance to a fluoroquinolone. Among all patients, only 14% (10/70) and 20% (14/70) self-reported "following Strict DO" and "following DO" respectively. Among DOT-providers, 46% (30/65) reported that their patients "followed DO". MSF health staff reported none of the patients "followed DO". Reasons for not implementing DO included the unavailability of DOT-provider, time spent, stigma and treatment adverse events. The qualitative data also revealed that "Strict DO" was rarely followed and noted the same reasons for lack of implementation.


CONCLUSION

This mixed-methods study has found that a majority of patients with DR-TB in Mumbai did not follow DO, and this was reported by patients and care-providers. These data likely reflect the reality of DO implementation in many high-burden settings, since this relatively small cohort was supported and closely monitored by a skilled team with access to multiple resources. The findings raise important concerns about the necessity of DO as a "pillar" of DR-TB treatment which need further validation in other settings. They also suggest that patient-centred adherence strategies might be better approaches for supporting patients on treatment.

Countries

India

Subject Area

antibiotic resistancetuberculosis

Languages

English
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0144936
Published Date
29 Dec 2015
PubMed ID
26713873
Journal
PLOS One
Volume | Issue | Pages
Volume 10, Issue 12
Issue Date
2015-12-29
Dimensions Badge
Similar Content
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...