Menu

HomeConferencesCollectionsCalls for PapersMSF Research EthicsClinical Case ReportingAboutMy Saved Content
Logo

Science Portal

  • My Saved Content
  • Browse All
  • Conferences
  • Collections
  • Calls for Papers
  • MSF Research Ethics
  • Clinical Case Reporting
  • About
English
logo
Science Portal
Copyright © Médecins Sans Frontières
v2.1.6224.produseast1
About MSF Science Portal
About
Contact Us
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Export All Citations
Copyright © Médecins Sans Frontières
v2.1.6224.produseast1
Comparison of three linezolid management strategies for peripheral neuropathy in multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treatment: a target trial emulation | Journal Article / Research | MSF Science Portal
Journal Article
|Research

Comparison of three linezolid management strategies for peripheral neuropathy in multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treatment: a target trial emulation

Romo M, LaHood A, Mitnick CD, Rich ML, Trevisi L, Skrahina A, Oyewusi L, Bastard M, Khan PY, Huerga H, Khan U, Herrera Flores E, Atshemyan H,
Hewison C,
Rashitov M,
Samieva N,
Gómez-Restrepo C,
Krisnanda A,
Kotrikadze T,
Siraj F,
Khan AW,
Ndjeka N,
Adenov M,
Seung KJ,
Kumsa A,
Franke MF
Download

Similar Content
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peripheral neuropathy frequently leads to linezolid dose reductions or interruptions during multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) treatment. The implications of these modifications on treatment success are uncertain.


METHODS

We conducted a target trial emulation using the endTB Observational Study among individuals who developed non-severe peripheral neuropathy while receiving linezolid 600 mg daily within 6 months of initiating an individualized MDR/RR-TB regimen. We examined three linezolid management strategies: immediate change (i.e., dose reduction, temporary interruption, discontinuation) within Weeks 1–7 after peripheral neuropathy onset, deferred change within Weeks 8–26, and no change (i.e., continuing linezolid 600 mg daily) during Weeks 1–26. To emulate the per-protocol analysis of a trial, we used an approach involving cloning and censoring participant data, and applying inverse probability of censoring weights.


RESULTS

Among 303 eligible participants from 12 countries, peripheral neuropathy occurred a median of 11 weeks (interquartile range: 4–18) after treatment initiation. Weighted, standardized probabilities of treatment success were 84.7% (95% CI: 69.2%, 92.9%) for immediate change, 78.9% (95% CI: 65.9%, 87.1%) for deferred change, and 85.2% (95% CI: 80.5%, 89.1%) for no change. Compared with no change, treatment success ratios were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.83, 1.11) for immediate change and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.78, 1.01) for deferred change.


CONCLUSIONS

We did not find evidence of a substantial negative impact of immediate modification to linezolid on MDR/RR-TB treatment success. Our results support the clinical practice of cautiously adjusting linezolid when needed to manage non-severe peripheral neuropathy.

Countries

Armenia Belarus Ethiopia Georgia
Indonesia
Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Lesotho
Myanmar
Pakistan
Peru
South Africa

Subject Area

antibiotic resistancetuberculosisantimicrobial resistance

Languages

English
DOI
10.1093/cid/ciag361
Published Date
12 Jun 2026
PubMed ID
42283325
Journal
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Volume | Issue | Pages
Online ahead of print
Dimensions Badge