People living with HIV (PLHIV) have an increased risk of tuberculosis (TB) and severe COVID-19. TB and COVID-19 present with overlapping symptoms and co-infection can lead to poor outcomes. We assessed the frequency of SARS-CoV-2 positive serology and SARS-CoV-2 infection and the risk of mortality at 6 months in PLHIV with TB disease and SARS-CoV-2 infection. This multi-country, prospective, observational study, conducted between 7th September 2020 and 7th April 2022, included ambulatory adult PLHIV investigated for TB (with symptoms of TB or advanced HIV disease) in Kenya, Uganda, and South Africa. Testing included CD4 cell count, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay (sputum), Determine TB LAM Ag assay (urine), chest X-ray, blood SARS-CoV-2 serology test and SARS-CoV-2 PCR (only if TB or COVID-19 symptoms). Individuals were followed for 6 months. Among 1254 participants, 1204 participants had SARS-CoV-2 serology (54% women, median CD4 344 cells/µL [IQR 132–673]), and 487 had SARS-CoV-2 PCR. SARS-CoV-2 serology positivity was 27.0% (325/1204), lower in PLHIV with CD4 counts <200 cells/µL (19.9%, 99/497) than in those with CD4 counts ≥200 cells/µL (31.6%, 222/703), p<0.001. SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity was 8.6% (42/487) and 27.7% (135/487) had probable or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among PLHIV with symptoms of TB or of COVID-19, 6.6% (32/487) had SARS-CoV-2 infection and TB disease. In multivariable analyses, the risk of death was higher in PLHIV with both SARS-CoV-2 infection and TB compared to those with only SARS-CoV-2 infection (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 8.90, 95%CI 1.47-53.96, p=0.017), with only TB (aHR 3.70, 95%CI 1.00-13.72, p=0.050) or with none of them (aHR 6.83, 95%CI 1.75-26.72, p=0.006). These findings support SARS-CoV-2 testing in PLHIV with symptoms of TB, and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, especially for those with severe immunosuppression. PLHIV with COVID-19 and TB have an increased risk of mortality and would benefit from comprehensive management and close monitoring.
BACKGROUND
Two sub variants (BA.4 and BA.5) of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant are concerning as they are spreading rapidly worldwide; however, no published data concerning these variants are available in Cameroon. We report the early detection of these new sub variants that are associated with the onset of the fifth wave of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in Cameroon.
METHODS
Positive samples were selected for next-generation sequencing (NGS). BA.4 and BA.5 complete genome sequences underwent sequence data analysis, epidemiology analysis of COVID-19’s resurgence and wave, recombination and pairwise matrix analysis, and phylogenetic analysis. We selected the first nine SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 sub variants detected in Cameroon using local whole genome sequencing for the NGS analysis.
RESULTS
During the fifth wave of resurgence of COVID-19 cases in Cameroon, it was found that the Northwest and Littoral regions were the most affected areas, while the Center and Littoral regions recorded the highest number of new deaths. The study identified evidence of recombination between the BA.2 sub variant and BA.4 and BA.5 Cameroonian strains. This result highlights the dynamic nature of SARS-CoV-2 evolution. The BA.5 strain (entitled hCoV-19/Cameroon/23850/2022) showed the highest sequence similarity to the first reported genome of the Omicron strain with 497 mutations. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that these nine Omicron sub variants were grouped into a distinct and highly distant cluster separate from the first Omicron variant detected in Botswana and were intermixed with sequences from other countries (the United States, Denmark, Scotland, and England), thus implying multiple introductions of the BA.4 and BA.5 sub variants in Cameroon.
CONCLUSIONS
Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 sub-lineages are associated with the onset of the fifth wave of COVID-19 in Cameroon. In addition to providing early warning of COVID-19 resurgence, continuous local genome sequencing of emerging variants is essential for detecting variants of concern, thereby guiding the country's response. This study emphasizes the value of real-time surveillance.
INTRODUCTION
Understanding sex and gender differences during outbreaks is critical to delivering an effective response. Although recommendations and minimum requirements exist, the incorporation of sex-disaggregated data and gender analysis into outbreak analytics and response for informed decision-making remains infrequent. A scoping review was conducted to provide an overview of the extent of sex-disaggregated data and gender analysis in outbreak response within low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
METHODS
Five databases were searched for peer-reviewed literature examining sex- and gender-specific outcomes for communicable disease outbreaks published in English between 1 January 2012 and 12 April 2022. An adapted version of the WHO’s Gender Analysis Matrix was used to synthesise evidence, which was then mapped across four phases of the outbreak timeline: prevention, detection, treatment/management and recovery.
RESULTS
71 articles met inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Sex-, gender-, and pregnancy-related disparities were identified throughout all four phases of the outbreak timeline. These disparities encompassed a wide range of risk factors for disease, vulnerability, access to and use of services, health-seeking behaviour, healthcare options, as well as experiences in healthcare settings and health and social outcomes and consequences.
CONCLUSION
Significant gender-evidence gaps remain in outbreak response. Evidence that is available illustrates that sex and gender disparities in outbreaks vary by disease, setting and population, and these differences play significant roles in shaping outbreak dynamics. As such, failing to collect, analyse or use sex-disaggregated data and gendered data during outbreaks results in less effective responses, differential adverse health outcomes, increased vulnerability among certain groups and insufficient evidence for effective prevention and response efforts. Systematic sex- and gender-based analyses to ensure gender-responsive outbreak prevention, detection, treatment/management and recovery are urgently needed.
We investigated people living with HIV (PLWH)’s exposure to COVID-19 pandemic stressors and their association with distress, psychological growth, and substance use. PLWH in the ANRS CO3 AQUIVIH-NA cohort’s QuAliV study (Nouvelle Aquitaine, France) completed an adapted CAIR Lab Pandemic Impact Questionnaire (C-PIQ) and reported substance use between 9/2021 to 3/2022. We described cumulative stressor exposure (score 0-16) and explored variation by PLWH characteristics (demographic, HIV-related, risk factors, psychosocial). Associations with distress (score 0-23), psychological growth (score 0-20), and substance use were assessed using regression models. Participants reported exposure to a median of 2 (IQR: 1-4) stressors. Stressor exposure was higher in working-age (<60) and psychosocially vulnerable PLWH. Exposure to an additional stressor correlated with a 0.7-point increase in distress scores (95% C.I. 0.5-1.0, p<0.001), a 0.04-point increase (95% C.I. 0.01-0.07, p=0.002) in psychological growth scores in working-age PLWH. In older PLWH, additional stressor correlated with a 0.8-point (95% C.I. 0.4-1.2, p<0.001) increase in distress and a 0.1-point increase (95% C.I. 0.06-0.2, p=0.001) in growth scores. Each additional stressor was associated with 1.2 (95% C.I. 1.0-1.4, p=0.02) higher adjusted odds of cannabis use in working-age PLWH, and 1.2 (95% C.I. 1.0-1.4, p=0.004) higher adjusted odds of drug use. Exposure to stressors was linked to increased distress, cannabis and drug use but also growth. Providers should not only be aware of risk (of severe COVID-19) but also be mindful of the social and psychological challenges PLWH face as these may affect their retention in care, especially during challenging times.
INTRODUCTION
Refugee settings may increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and death, yet data on the response to the pandemic in these populations is scarce.
METHODS
We describe interventions to mitigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Dadaab Refugee Camp Complex, Kenya and performed descriptive analyses using March 2020 to December 2022 data from Kenya's national SARS-CoV-2 repository and line list of positive cases maintained by United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). We calculated case fatality rates (CFR) and attack rates per 100,000 (AR) using the 2019 national census and population statistics from UNHCR and compared them to national figures.
RESULTS
SARS-CoV-2 infection was first reported in April and May 2020, among host community members and refugees respectively. Of 964 laboratory-confirmed cases, 700 (72.6 %) were refugees. The AR was 82.7 (95 % CI 72.6–92.8) for host community members, 228.3 (95 % CI 211.3–245.4) for refugees and 721.1 (95 % CI 718.7–723.5) nationally. The CFR was 1.5 % (95 % CI 0.15–3.18) for host community members, 1.76 % (95 % CI 1.71–1.80) nationally and 7.4 % (95 % CI 5.4–9.4) for refugees.
Mitigation measures implemented by the Government of Kenya, UNHCR and partners during the pandemic included multisectoral coordination, movement restrictions, mass gathering bans, and health promotion. Social distancing, symptom screening and mandatory mask usage were enforced during mass gatherings. Testing capacity was bolstered, quarantine and isolation facilities established, and vaccination initiated.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite a low AR and UNHCR's swift and comprehensive response, refugees' CFR was high, underscoring their vulnerability and need for targeted interventions during epidemic responses.
INTRODUCTION
Migrant populations (asylum seekers, permit holders, refugees, and undocumented migrants) living in South Africa face various individual, social, and physical circumstances that underpin their decisions, motivation, and ability to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. We conducted a qualitative study to explore the experiences and perceptions of migrant populations in South Africa on COVID-19 vaccines to inform recommendations for improved COVID-19 immunization.
METHODS
We conducted an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) with 20 asylum seekers, permit holders, refugees, and undocumented migrants living in South Africa. We applied a maximum variation purposive sampling approach to capture all three categories of migrants in South Africa. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and recorded electronically with consent and permission from the study participants. The recordings were transcribed and analyzed thematically following the IPA using Atlas.ti version 9.
RESULTS
Four major reflective themes emanated from the data analysis. (1) While some migrants perceived being excluded from the South African national immunization program at the level of advertisement and felt discriminated against at the immunization centers, others felt included in the program at all levels. (2) Skepticism, myths, and conspiracy theories around the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 vaccine are pervasive among migrant populations in South Africa. (3) There is a continuum of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance/hesitancy ranging from being vaccinated through waiting for the chance to be vaccinated to refusal. (4) Accepting the vaccine or being hesitant follows the beliefs of the participant, knowledge of the vaccine’s benefits, and lessons learned from others already vaccinated.
CONCLUSION
COVID-19 vaccine inclusiveness, awareness, and uptake should be enhanced through migrant-aware policies and actions such as community mobilization, healthcare professional training, and mass media campaigns.
BACKGROUND
Little is known about the evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immunity in African communities.
AIM
We evaluated changes in anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, mortality and vaccination status in Cameroon between August 2021 and September 2022 to begin describing the evolution of the pandemic in Africa.
SETTING
The study was conducted across Cameroon’s 10 regional capitals, between 2021 and 2022 as the country hosted a mass gathering.
METHODS
We conducted a cross-sectional population-based survey in 2022, including SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence testing and retrospective mortality estimation using two-stage cluster sampling. We estimated and compared seroprevalence and crude mortality rates (CMR) to a survey conducted in 2021 using the same methodology.
RESULTS
We performed serologic testing on 8400 individuals and collected mortality data from 22 314 individuals. Approximately 5% in each survey reported SARS-CoV-2-vaccination. Rapid diagnostic test-based seroprevalence increased from 11.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10–12.5) to 59.8% (95% CI: 58.3–61.2) between 2021 and 2022, despite no increase in the proportion vaccinated. The CMR decreased from 0.17 to 0.06 deaths per 10 000 persons per day between 2021 and 2022. In 2022, no deaths were reportedly attributable to COVID-19 as compared to 17 deaths in 2021.
CONCLUSION
Over a 12-month period encompassing two waves of omicron variant SARS-CoV-2 and a mass gathering, SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in Cameroon approached 60%, and deaths declined despite low vaccination coverage.
CONTRIBUTION
This study challenges the assumption that high immunisation coverage is the sole determinant of epidemic control in the African context and encourages policymakers to increasingly rely on local research when designing response strategies for more effective outbreak management.
BACKGROUND
Little is known about attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination in sub-Saharan Africa, where immunisation coverage is the lowest in the world.
AIM
The study aimed to identify factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake in Cameroon, and assess changes in these factors over a period of time.
SETTING
The study was conducted in the ten regions of Cameroon.
METHODS
The authors conducted a two-phase cross-sectional survey in the 10 regions of Cameroon, from July 2021 to August 2021 (Phase one) and from August 2022 to September 2022 (Phase two). We analysed reasons for vaccine hesitancy descriptively and used logistic regression to assess factors associated with hesitancy.
RESULTS
Overall, we enrolled 12 109 participants: 6567 (54.23%) in Phase one and 5542 (45.77%) in Phase two. Of these, 8009 (66.14%) were not interested in receiving the COVID-19 vaccine (n = 4176 in Phase one, n = 3833 in Phase two). The refusal rate increased significantly in the northern region from 27.00% in Phase 1 to 60.00% in Phase two. The leading contributor to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was fear that the vaccine was dangerous, which was significantly associated (95% confidence interval [CI], p < 0.05%) with vaccine refusal in both phases. Overall, 32.90% of participants (n = 2578) perceived the COVID-19 vaccine to be dangerous. Advanced age, male gender, Muslim religion and low level of education were associated with vaccine acceptance. Participants reported that healthcare workers were the most trusted source of information about the COVID-19 vaccine by 5005 (42.84%) participants.
CONCLUSION
Despite the investment of the Ministry of Health and its partners in community engagement, focussing on communication about the vaccine efficacy, tolerance and potential adverse events, fear of the vaccine remains high, likely leading to vaccine hesitancy in Cameroon between 2021 and 2022.
CONTRIBUTION
The study highlight regional variations in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in Cameroon, with factors age, gender, religion and education influencing willingness to vaccine. Trust in health workers was high, indicating that, tailored, community-led vaccination strategies are key for improving vaccine uptake, not only for COVID-19 but also for future epidemics.