Conference Material > Abstract
Fahal AH, Ahmed ES, Bakhiet SM, Bakheet OE, Fahal LA, et al.
MSF Scientific Day International 2024. 16 May 2024; DOI:10.57740/jZnxUIaJi7
INTRODUCTION
Treatment options for the highly neglected fungal tropical disease eumycetoma are limited and poorly adapted to patients’ contexts, with surgery often required. The first-line treatment, itraconazole, thought to be 40% effective, must be taken twice daily for ≥12 months with food, making adherence difficult. An effective, affordable, context-appropriate treatment is urgently needed. The Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi) repurposed the broad-spectrum antifungal agent fosravuconazole, developed by Eisai Ltd for onychomycosis. We aimed to compare two different doses of weekly fosravuconazole with standard-of-care daily itraconazole in patients with eumycetoma.
METHODS
This phase 2, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, superiority trial was done at the Mycetoma Research Centre, Soba University Hospital, Sudan. Patients aged ≥15 years with a small-to-medium lesion (≥2 to <16 cm) caused by M mycetomatis requiring surgery were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive either 300 mg fosravuconazole weekly (group 1), 200 mg fosravuconazole weekly (group 2), or 400 mg itraconazole daily (group 3), for 12 months, together with surgery at 6 months in all groups. The primary efficacy endpoint, assessed in all patients receiving at least one dose of study drug (modified intention to treat), was complete cure at 12 months (absence of eumycetoma mass and sinuses and discharge with normal imaging; or a negative fungal culture if mass present). Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03086226).
RESULTS
Between 9 May, 2017, and 10 June, 2021, 104 patients were randomised (34 to group 1, 34 to group 2, and 36 to group 3).Median age was 29.0 (IQR22.0–33.0), 23.0 (20.0–29.0) and 24.5 (19.5–33.0) years for Groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Complete cure rates at end of treatment were 50.0% (95% CI 32.4–67.6), 64.7% (46.5–80.3), and 75.0% (57.8–87.9) with Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively, showing no superiority of fosravuconazole over the standard-of-care (p=0.030 for Group 2 vs Group 3; and p=0.347 for Group 1 vs Group 3; with significance level set at 0.022). Treatment-emergent adverse drug reactions were reported in one (3%) of 34 patients in group 2 (nausea or vomiting) and three (8%) of 36 patients in group 3 (cortisol decreased, QT prolonged).
CONCLUSION
Although not superior, fosravuconazole 200 mg seemed to have similar efficacy to itraconazole, coupled with advantages such as a weekly, not daily, administration, no food effect, and low risk for drug-drug interactions. An early access programme is under review by authorities in Sudan and a regulatory dossier and global access plan are under preparation.
Treatment options for the highly neglected fungal tropical disease eumycetoma are limited and poorly adapted to patients’ contexts, with surgery often required. The first-line treatment, itraconazole, thought to be 40% effective, must be taken twice daily for ≥12 months with food, making adherence difficult. An effective, affordable, context-appropriate treatment is urgently needed. The Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi) repurposed the broad-spectrum antifungal agent fosravuconazole, developed by Eisai Ltd for onychomycosis. We aimed to compare two different doses of weekly fosravuconazole with standard-of-care daily itraconazole in patients with eumycetoma.
METHODS
This phase 2, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, superiority trial was done at the Mycetoma Research Centre, Soba University Hospital, Sudan. Patients aged ≥15 years with a small-to-medium lesion (≥2 to <16 cm) caused by M mycetomatis requiring surgery were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive either 300 mg fosravuconazole weekly (group 1), 200 mg fosravuconazole weekly (group 2), or 400 mg itraconazole daily (group 3), for 12 months, together with surgery at 6 months in all groups. The primary efficacy endpoint, assessed in all patients receiving at least one dose of study drug (modified intention to treat), was complete cure at 12 months (absence of eumycetoma mass and sinuses and discharge with normal imaging; or a negative fungal culture if mass present). Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03086226).
RESULTS
Between 9 May, 2017, and 10 June, 2021, 104 patients were randomised (34 to group 1, 34 to group 2, and 36 to group 3).Median age was 29.0 (IQR22.0–33.0), 23.0 (20.0–29.0) and 24.5 (19.5–33.0) years for Groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Complete cure rates at end of treatment were 50.0% (95% CI 32.4–67.6), 64.7% (46.5–80.3), and 75.0% (57.8–87.9) with Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively, showing no superiority of fosravuconazole over the standard-of-care (p=0.030 for Group 2 vs Group 3; and p=0.347 for Group 1 vs Group 3; with significance level set at 0.022). Treatment-emergent adverse drug reactions were reported in one (3%) of 34 patients in group 2 (nausea or vomiting) and three (8%) of 36 patients in group 3 (cortisol decreased, QT prolonged).
CONCLUSION
Although not superior, fosravuconazole 200 mg seemed to have similar efficacy to itraconazole, coupled with advantages such as a weekly, not daily, administration, no food effect, and low risk for drug-drug interactions. An early access programme is under review by authorities in Sudan and a regulatory dossier and global access plan are under preparation.
Conference Material > Slide Presentation
Fahal AH, Ahmed ES, Bakhiet SM, Bakheet OE, Fahal LA, et al.
MSF Scientific Day International 2024. 16 May 2024; DOI:10.57740/YDzkQTI
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Trop Med Int Health. 1 July 2007; Volume 12 (Issue 7); DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01871.x
Tostmann A, Boeree M, Harries AD, Sauvageot D, Banda HT, et al.
Trop Med Int Health. 1 July 2007; Volume 12 (Issue 7); DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01871.x
The proportion of patients with antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity (ATDH) was unexpectedly low during a trial on cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in Malawian HIV-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients. About 2% of the patients developed grade 2 or 3 hepatotoxicity during tuberculosis (TB) treatment, according to WHO definitions. Data on ATDH in sub-Saharan Africa are limited. Although the numbers are not very strong, our trial and other papers suggest that ATDH is uncommon in this region. These findings are encouraging in that hepatotoxicity may cause less problem than expected, especially in the light of combined HIV/TB treatment, where drug toxicity is a major cause of treatment interruption.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 21 February 2019; DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0007132.
Diro EGJ, Edwards T, Ritmeijer KKD, Fikre H, Abongomera C, et al.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 21 February 2019; DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0007132.
BACKGROUND:
The long-term treatment outcome of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) patients with HIV co-infection is complicated by a high rate of relapse, especially when the CD4 count is low. Although use of secondary prophylaxis is recommended, it is not routinely practiced and data on its effectiveness and safety are limited.
METHODS:
A prospective cohort study was conducted in Northwest Ethiopia from August 2014 to August 2017 (NCT02011958). HIV-VL patients were followed for up to 12 months. Patients with CD4 cell counts below 200/μL at the end of VL treatment received pentamidine prophylaxis starting one month after parasitological cure, while those with CD4 count ≥200 cells/μL were followed without secondary prophylaxis. Compliance, safety and relapse-free survival, using Kaplan-Meier analysis methods to account for variable time at risk, were summarised. Risk factors for relapse or death were analysed.
RESULTS:
Fifty-four HIV patients were followed. The probability of relapse-free survival at one year was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35-63%): 53% (30-71%) in 22 patients with CD4 ≥200 cells/μL without pentamidine prophylaxis and 46% (26-63%) in 29 with CD4 <200 cells/μL who started pentamidine. Three patients with CD4 <200 cells/μL did not start pentamidine. Amongst those with CD4 ≥200 cells/μL, VL relapse was an independent risk factor for subsequent relapse or death (adjusted rate ratio: 5.42, 95% CI: 1.1-25.8). Except for one case of renal failure which was considered possibly related to pentamidine, there were no drug-related safety concerns.
CONCLUSION:
The relapse-free survival rate for VL patients with HIV was low. Relapse-free survival of patients with CD4 count <200cells/μL given pentamidine secondary prophylaxis appeared to be comparable to patients with a CD4 count ≥200 cells/μL not given prophylaxis. Patients with relapsed VL are at higher risk for subsequent relapse and should be considered a priority for secondary prophylaxis, irrespective of their CD4 count.
The long-term treatment outcome of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) patients with HIV co-infection is complicated by a high rate of relapse, especially when the CD4 count is low. Although use of secondary prophylaxis is recommended, it is not routinely practiced and data on its effectiveness and safety are limited.
METHODS:
A prospective cohort study was conducted in Northwest Ethiopia from August 2014 to August 2017 (NCT02011958). HIV-VL patients were followed for up to 12 months. Patients with CD4 cell counts below 200/μL at the end of VL treatment received pentamidine prophylaxis starting one month after parasitological cure, while those with CD4 count ≥200 cells/μL were followed without secondary prophylaxis. Compliance, safety and relapse-free survival, using Kaplan-Meier analysis methods to account for variable time at risk, were summarised. Risk factors for relapse or death were analysed.
RESULTS:
Fifty-four HIV patients were followed. The probability of relapse-free survival at one year was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35-63%): 53% (30-71%) in 22 patients with CD4 ≥200 cells/μL without pentamidine prophylaxis and 46% (26-63%) in 29 with CD4 <200 cells/μL who started pentamidine. Three patients with CD4 <200 cells/μL did not start pentamidine. Amongst those with CD4 ≥200 cells/μL, VL relapse was an independent risk factor for subsequent relapse or death (adjusted rate ratio: 5.42, 95% CI: 1.1-25.8). Except for one case of renal failure which was considered possibly related to pentamidine, there were no drug-related safety concerns.
CONCLUSION:
The relapse-free survival rate for VL patients with HIV was low. Relapse-free survival of patients with CD4 count <200cells/μL given pentamidine secondary prophylaxis appeared to be comparable to patients with a CD4 count ≥200 cells/μL not given prophylaxis. Patients with relapsed VL are at higher risk for subsequent relapse and should be considered a priority for secondary prophylaxis, irrespective of their CD4 count.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Clin Infect Dis. 15 March 2018; Volume 67 (Issue 5); DOI:10.1093/cid/ciy172
den Boer ML, Das AK, Akhter F, Burza S, Ramesh V, et al.
Clin Infect Dis. 15 March 2018; Volume 67 (Issue 5); DOI:10.1093/cid/ciy172
A safe and effective short-course treatment regimen for Post Kala Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis (PKDL) is considered essential for achieving and sustaining elimination of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in the Indian subcontinent.(1, 2) Here, single dose liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) has been adopted as a first line regimen for VL; however the effectiveness and safety of AmBisome for PKDL has not been formally evaluated.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 17 January 2019; Volume 13 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0006988
Diro EGJ, Blesson S, Edwards T, Koert R, Ritmeijer KKD, et al.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 17 January 2019; Volume 13 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0006988
BACKGROUND
Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infected patients requires special case management. AmBisome monotherapy at 40 mg/kg is recommended by the World Health Organization. The objective of the study was to assess if a combination of a lower dose of AmBisome with miltefosine would show acceptable efficacy at the end of treatment.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
An open-label, non-comparative randomized trial of AmBisome (30 mg/kg) with miltefosine (100 mg/day for 28 days), and AmBisome monotherapy (40 mg/kg) was conducted in Ethiopian VL patients co-infected with HIV (NCT02011958). A sequential design was used with a triangular continuation region. The primary outcome was parasite clearance at day 29, after the first round of treatment. Patients with clinical improvement but without parasite clearance at day 29 received a second round of the allocated treatment. Efficacy was evaluated again at day 58, after completion of treatment.
Recruitment was stopped after inclusion of 19 and 39 patients in monotherapy and combination arms respectively, as per pre-specified stopping rules. At D29, intention-to-treat efficacy in the AmBisome arm was 70% (95% CI 45–87%) in the unadjusted analysis, and 50% (95% CI 27–73%) in the adjusted analysis, while in the combination arm, it was 81% (95% CI 67–90%) and 67% (95% CI 48–82%) respectively. At D58, the adjusted efficacy was 55% (95% CI 32–78%) in the monotherapy arm, and 88% (95% CI 79–98%) in the combination arm.
No major safety concerns related to the study medication were identified. Ten SAEs were observed within the treatment period, and 4 deaths unrelated to the study medication.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE
The extended treatment strategy with the combination regimen showed the highest documented efficacy in HIV-VL patients; these results support a recommendation of this regimen as first-line treatment strategy for HIV-VL patients in eastern Africa.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02011958
Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infected patients requires special case management. AmBisome monotherapy at 40 mg/kg is recommended by the World Health Organization. The objective of the study was to assess if a combination of a lower dose of AmBisome with miltefosine would show acceptable efficacy at the end of treatment.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
An open-label, non-comparative randomized trial of AmBisome (30 mg/kg) with miltefosine (100 mg/day for 28 days), and AmBisome monotherapy (40 mg/kg) was conducted in Ethiopian VL patients co-infected with HIV (NCT02011958). A sequential design was used with a triangular continuation region. The primary outcome was parasite clearance at day 29, after the first round of treatment. Patients with clinical improvement but without parasite clearance at day 29 received a second round of the allocated treatment. Efficacy was evaluated again at day 58, after completion of treatment.
Recruitment was stopped after inclusion of 19 and 39 patients in monotherapy and combination arms respectively, as per pre-specified stopping rules. At D29, intention-to-treat efficacy in the AmBisome arm was 70% (95% CI 45–87%) in the unadjusted analysis, and 50% (95% CI 27–73%) in the adjusted analysis, while in the combination arm, it was 81% (95% CI 67–90%) and 67% (95% CI 48–82%) respectively. At D58, the adjusted efficacy was 55% (95% CI 32–78%) in the monotherapy arm, and 88% (95% CI 79–98%) in the combination arm.
No major safety concerns related to the study medication were identified. Ten SAEs were observed within the treatment period, and 4 deaths unrelated to the study medication.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE
The extended treatment strategy with the combination regimen showed the highest documented efficacy in HIV-VL patients; these results support a recommendation of this regimen as first-line treatment strategy for HIV-VL patients in eastern Africa.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02011958
Protocol > Research Protocol
Hailu ADE, Diro EGJ, Kolja S, Ritmeijer KKD, Yifru S, et al.
1 July 2018
General Objectives
The overall objective of this trial is to identify a safe and effective treatment for VL in HIV coinfected
patients.
Primary Objective:
To evaluate at day 29 assessment the efficacy of a combination regimen of AmBisome®
+
miltefosine and AmBisome®
monotherapy in Ethiopian co-infected HIV + VL patients.
Secondary Objectives:
1. To evaluate relapse-free survival at day 390 (after initial cure at day 29 or cure at day 58 after
extended treatment).
2. To assess safety of the regimens.
Other objectives:
1.To evaluate of viral load and CD4 count in all patients
2. To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ARV, Ambisome and miltefosine and immune function
markers in a subset of patients
The overall objective of this trial is to identify a safe and effective treatment for VL in HIV coinfected
patients.
Primary Objective:
To evaluate at day 29 assessment the efficacy of a combination regimen of AmBisome®
+
miltefosine and AmBisome®
monotherapy in Ethiopian co-infected HIV + VL patients.
Secondary Objectives:
1. To evaluate relapse-free survival at day 390 (after initial cure at day 29 or cure at day 58 after
extended treatment).
2. To assess safety of the regimens.
Other objectives:
1.To evaluate of viral load and CD4 count in all patients
2. To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ARV, Ambisome and miltefosine and immune function
markers in a subset of patients
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 7 August 2014; Volume 8 (Issue 8); DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003011
van Griensven J, Diro EGJ, Lopez-Velez R, Ritmeijer KKD, Boelaert M, et al.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 7 August 2014; Volume 8 (Issue 8); DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003011
In the wake of the HIV epidemic, visceral leishmaniasis (VL), a disseminated protozoan infection caused by the Leishmania donovani complex, has been re-emerging, particularly in North Ethiopia where up to 40% of patients with VL are co-infected with HIV. Management of VL in HIV co-infection is complicated by increased drug toxicity, and high treatment failure and relapse rates with all currently available drugs, despite initiation of antiretroviral treatment. Tackling L. donovani infection before disease onset would thus be a logical approach. A screen-and-treat approach targeting latent or the early stage of infection has successfully been implemented in other HIV-associated opportunistic infections. While conceptually attractive in the context of VL-HIV, the basic understanding and evidence underpinning such an approach is currently lacking. Prospective cohort studies will have to be conducted to quantify the risk of VL in different risk groups and across CD4 cell count levels. This will allow developing clinical prognostic tools, integrating clinical, HIV and Leishmania infection markers. Interventional studies will be needed to evaluate prophylactic or pre-emptive treatment strategies for those at risk, ideally relying on an oral (combination) regimen. Issues like tolerability, emergence of resistance and drug interactions will require due attention. The need for maintenance therapy will have to be assessed. Based on the risk-benefit data, VL risk cut-offs will have to be identified to target treatment to those most likely to benefit. Such a strategy should be complemented with early initiation of antiretroviral treatment and other strategies to prevent HIV and Leishmania infection.