Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
PLOS One. 2016 March 31; Volume 11 (Issue 3); DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0152676
Rostrup M, Edwards JK, Abukalish M, Ezzabi M, Some D, et al.
PLOS One. 2016 March 31; Volume 11 (Issue 3); DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0152676
Outbreaks of methanol poisoning occur frequently on a global basis, affecting poor and vulnerable populations. Knowledge regarding methanol is limited, likely many cases and even outbreaks go unnoticed, with patients dying unnecessarily. We describe findings from the first three large outbreaks of methanol poisoning where Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) responded, and evaluate the benefits of a possible future collaboration between local health authorities, a Non-Governmental Organisation and international expertise.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
PLOS One. 2016 January 26; Volume 11 (Issue 1); e0145634.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0145634
Some D, Edwards JK, Reid AJ, Van der Bergh R, Kosqei RJ, et al.
PLOS One. 2016 January 26; Volume 11 (Issue 1); e0145634.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0145634
BACKGROUND
In sub-Saharan Africa there is an increasing need to leverage available health care workers to provide care for non-communicable diseases (NCDs). This study was conducted to evaluate adherence to Médecins Sans Frontières clinical protocols when the care of five stable NCDs (hypertension, diabetes mellitus type 2, epilepsy, asthma, and sickle cell) was shifted from clinical officers to nurses.
METHODS
Descriptive, retrospective review of routinely collected clinic data from two integrated primary health care facilities within an urban informal settlement, Kibera, Nairobi, Kenya (May to August 2014).
RESULTS
There were 3,554 consultations (2025 patients); 733 (21%) were by nurses out of which 725 met the inclusion criteria among 616 patients. Hypertension (64%, 397/616) was the most frequent NCD followed by asthma (17%, 106/616) and diabetes mellitus (15%, 95/616). Adherence to screening questions ranged from 65% to 86%, with an average of 69%. Weight and blood pressure measurements were completed in 89% and 96% of those required. Laboratory results were reviewed in 91% of indicated visits. Laboratory testing per NCD protocols was higher in those with hypertension (88%) than diabetes mellitus (67%) upon review. Only 17 (2%) consultations were referred back to clinical officers.
CONCLUSIONS
Nurses are able to adhere to protocols for managing stable NCD patients based on clear and standardized protocols and guidelines, thus paving the way towards task shifting of NCD care to nurses to help relieve the significant healthcare gap in developing countries.
In sub-Saharan Africa there is an increasing need to leverage available health care workers to provide care for non-communicable diseases (NCDs). This study was conducted to evaluate adherence to Médecins Sans Frontières clinical protocols when the care of five stable NCDs (hypertension, diabetes mellitus type 2, epilepsy, asthma, and sickle cell) was shifted from clinical officers to nurses.
METHODS
Descriptive, retrospective review of routinely collected clinic data from two integrated primary health care facilities within an urban informal settlement, Kibera, Nairobi, Kenya (May to August 2014).
RESULTS
There were 3,554 consultations (2025 patients); 733 (21%) were by nurses out of which 725 met the inclusion criteria among 616 patients. Hypertension (64%, 397/616) was the most frequent NCD followed by asthma (17%, 106/616) and diabetes mellitus (15%, 95/616). Adherence to screening questions ranged from 65% to 86%, with an average of 69%. Weight and blood pressure measurements were completed in 89% and 96% of those required. Laboratory results were reviewed in 91% of indicated visits. Laboratory testing per NCD protocols was higher in those with hypertension (88%) than diabetes mellitus (67%) upon review. Only 17 (2%) consultations were referred back to clinical officers.
CONCLUSIONS
Nurses are able to adhere to protocols for managing stable NCD patients based on clear and standardized protocols and guidelines, thus paving the way towards task shifting of NCD care to nurses to help relieve the significant healthcare gap in developing countries.
Conference Material > Abstract
Ronoh Y, Some D, Ortuno R, Kuwenyi K, Mupepe T, et al.
MSF Scientific Days International 2020: Research. 2020 May 20
INTRODUCTION
Cervical cancer is now largely a preventable disease; however, implementation of highly sensitive molecular screening technologies in low-resource settings is partly hindered by the need for intensive investment in equipment and highly trained, skilled laboratory personnel. Resource limitations often preclude the possibility of same-day screening and treatment, as recommend by WHO. We sought to assess the diagnostic accuracy of self-collected versus nurse-collected high vaginal samples (HVS) for human papillomavirus (HPV) screening using GeneXpert, for within-country validation and to further inform its scale-up within routine point-of-care testing in primary healthcare systems.
METHODS
Consenting women presenting for routine cervical screening in selected health facilities in Gutu District, Zimbabwe, were asked to provide three HVS obtained at the same time on a single visit; the first, self-collected, and the following two, nurse-collected. Nurse-collected HVS were tested with GeneXpert (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, USA) and Cobas HPV (Roche, Pleasanton, USA; used as the reference test), whilst self-collected HVS were tested only using GeneXpert. Those testing positive on the reference test were offered visual inspection with acetic acid and cervicography (VIAC). Women with a positive VIAC examination were offered cryotherapy or loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
ETHICS
This study was approved by the MSF Ethics Review Board.
RESULTS
279 participants consented to provide HVS; none reported discomfort or side effects during or after swabbing. Among nurse-collected HVS, 11/279 participants were found positive on genotyping for HPV-16 using Cobas HPV, and nine of 279 were positive using GeneXpert. Eight out of 279 were identified on genotyping for HPV-18/45 using both platforms. The sensitivities of testing for HPV-16 and 18/45 using GeneXpert as compared to the reference test, Cobas, were 89% (95%CI 53-100) and 63% (95%CI 25-92) respectively. The sensitivity of self- and nurse-collected HVS for HPV-16 tested using GeneXpert, as compared to the reference test, was 89% (eight of nine; 95%CI 52-100). Specificity was 100% (95%CI 97-100), with a positive predictive value of 89% (95%CI 52-100), and negative predictive value of 100% (95%CI 97-100). However, sensitivity for detection of HPV-18/45 was 68.3% (95%CI 34-100).
CONCLUSION
Performance of cervical cancer screening using self-collected HVS tested with GeneXpert is comparable to that with nurse-collected HVS. Integrated GeneXpert platforms are already in wide use, enabling rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis, detection of HIV viral load, and early infant diagnosis of HIV, using a single piece of equipment. Deploying GeneXpert for HPV screening using self-collected HVS could help to provide timely results, especially in settings where VIAC is unavailable.
Cervical cancer is now largely a preventable disease; however, implementation of highly sensitive molecular screening technologies in low-resource settings is partly hindered by the need for intensive investment in equipment and highly trained, skilled laboratory personnel. Resource limitations often preclude the possibility of same-day screening and treatment, as recommend by WHO. We sought to assess the diagnostic accuracy of self-collected versus nurse-collected high vaginal samples (HVS) for human papillomavirus (HPV) screening using GeneXpert, for within-country validation and to further inform its scale-up within routine point-of-care testing in primary healthcare systems.
METHODS
Consenting women presenting for routine cervical screening in selected health facilities in Gutu District, Zimbabwe, were asked to provide three HVS obtained at the same time on a single visit; the first, self-collected, and the following two, nurse-collected. Nurse-collected HVS were tested with GeneXpert (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, USA) and Cobas HPV (Roche, Pleasanton, USA; used as the reference test), whilst self-collected HVS were tested only using GeneXpert. Those testing positive on the reference test were offered visual inspection with acetic acid and cervicography (VIAC). Women with a positive VIAC examination were offered cryotherapy or loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
ETHICS
This study was approved by the MSF Ethics Review Board.
RESULTS
279 participants consented to provide HVS; none reported discomfort or side effects during or after swabbing. Among nurse-collected HVS, 11/279 participants were found positive on genotyping for HPV-16 using Cobas HPV, and nine of 279 were positive using GeneXpert. Eight out of 279 were identified on genotyping for HPV-18/45 using both platforms. The sensitivities of testing for HPV-16 and 18/45 using GeneXpert as compared to the reference test, Cobas, were 89% (95%CI 53-100) and 63% (95%CI 25-92) respectively. The sensitivity of self- and nurse-collected HVS for HPV-16 tested using GeneXpert, as compared to the reference test, was 89% (eight of nine; 95%CI 52-100). Specificity was 100% (95%CI 97-100), with a positive predictive value of 89% (95%CI 52-100), and negative predictive value of 100% (95%CI 97-100). However, sensitivity for detection of HPV-18/45 was 68.3% (95%CI 34-100).
CONCLUSION
Performance of cervical cancer screening using self-collected HVS tested with GeneXpert is comparable to that with nurse-collected HVS. Integrated GeneXpert platforms are already in wide use, enabling rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis, detection of HIV viral load, and early infant diagnosis of HIV, using a single piece of equipment. Deploying GeneXpert for HPV screening using self-collected HVS could help to provide timely results, especially in settings where VIAC is unavailable.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
AIDS Care. 2008 February 1; Volume 20 (Issue 2); DOI:10.1080/09540120701513677
Unge C, Johansson A, Zachariah R, Some D, van Engelgem I, et al.
AIDS Care. 2008 February 1; Volume 20 (Issue 2); DOI:10.1080/09540120701513677
The aim of this study was to explore why patients in the urban Kibera slum, Nairobi, Kenya, offered free antiretroviral treatment (ART) at the Médecins Sans Frontièrs (MSF) clinic, choose not to be treated despite signs of AIDS. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 patients, 9 men and 17 women. Six main reasons emerged for not accepting ART: a) fear of taking medication on an empty stomach due to lack of food; b) fear that side-effects associated with ART would make one more ill; c) fear of disclosure and its possible negative repercussions; d) concern for continuity of treatment and care; e) conflicting information from religious leaders and community, and seeking alternative care (e.g. traditional medicine); f) illiteracy making patients unable to understand the information given by health workers.
Conference Material > Poster
Ngwa W, Manangazira P, Some D, Ortuno R, Ronoh Y, et al.
MSF Scientific Days International 2021: Research. 2021 May 18
Conference Material > Slide Presentation
Ronoh Y, Some D, Ortuno R, Kuwenyi K, Mupepe T, et al.
MSF Scientific Days International 2020: Research. 2020 May 13