Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Infect Agent Cancer. 2018 January 19; Volume 13 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1186/s13027-018-0177-6
Fardhdiani V, Molfino L, Zamudio AG, Manuel R, Luciano G, et al.
Infect Agent Cancer. 2018 January 19; Volume 13 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1186/s13027-018-0177-6
Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is a common HIV-associated malignancy associated with disability, pain and poor outcomes. The cornerstone of its treatment is antiretroviral therapy, but advanced disease necessitates the addition of chemotherapy. In high-income settings, this often consists of liposomal anthracyclines, but in Mozambique, the first line includes conventional doxorubicin, bleomycin and vincristine, which is poorly-tolerated. Médecins Sans Frontières supports the Ministry of Health (MOH) in a specialized HIV and KS treatment center at the Centro de Referencia de Alto Maé in Maputo.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 December 29; Volume 9 (Issue 12); e0004274.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0004274
Grout L, Martinez-Pino I, Ciglenecki I, Keita S, Diallo AK, et al.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 December 29; Volume 9 (Issue 12); e0004274.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0004274
INTRODUCTION
Since 2010, WHO has recommended oral cholera vaccines as an additional strategy for cholera control. During a cholera episode, pregnant women are at high risk of complications, and the risk of fetal death has been reported to be 2-36%. Due to a lack of safety data, pregnant women have been excluded from most cholera vaccination campaigns. In 2012, reactive campaigns using the bivalent killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine (BivWC), included all people living in the targeted areas aged ≥ 1 year regardless of pregnancy status, were implemented in Guinea. We aimed to determine whether there was a difference in pregnancy outcomes between vaccinated and non-vaccinated pregnant women.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
From 11 November to 4 December 2013, we conducted a retrospective cohort study in Boffa prefecture among women who were pregnant in 2012 during or after the vaccination campaign. The primary outcome was pregnancy loss, as reported by the mother, and fetal malformations, after clinical examination. Primary exposure was the intake of the BivWC vaccine (Shanchol) during pregnancy, as determined by a vaccination card or oral history. We compared the risk of pregnancy loss between vaccinated and non-vaccinated women through binomial regression analysis. A total of 2,494 pregnancies were included in the analysis. The crude incidence of pregnancy loss was 3.7% (95%CI 2.7-4.8) for fetuses exposed to BivWC vaccine and 2.6% (0.7-4.5) for non-exposed fetuses. The incidence of malformation was 0.6% (0.1-1.0) and 1.2% (0.0-2.5) in BivWC-exposed and non-exposed fetuses, respectively. In both crude and adjusted analyses, fetal exposure to BivWC was not significantly associated with pregnancy loss (adjusted risk ratio (aRR = 1.09 [95%CI: 0.5-2.25], p = 0.818) or malformations (aRR = 0.50 [95%CI: 0.13-1.91], p = 0.314).
CONCLUSIONS
In this large retrospective cohort study, we found no association between fetal exposure to BivWC and risk of pregnancy loss or malformation. Despite the weaknesses of a retrospective design, we can conclude that if a risk exists, it is very low. Additional prospective studies are warranted to add to the evidence base on OCV use during pregnancy. Pregnant women are particularly vulnerable during cholera episodes and should be included in vaccination campaigns when the risk of cholera is high, such as during outbreaks.
Since 2010, WHO has recommended oral cholera vaccines as an additional strategy for cholera control. During a cholera episode, pregnant women are at high risk of complications, and the risk of fetal death has been reported to be 2-36%. Due to a lack of safety data, pregnant women have been excluded from most cholera vaccination campaigns. In 2012, reactive campaigns using the bivalent killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine (BivWC), included all people living in the targeted areas aged ≥ 1 year regardless of pregnancy status, were implemented in Guinea. We aimed to determine whether there was a difference in pregnancy outcomes between vaccinated and non-vaccinated pregnant women.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
From 11 November to 4 December 2013, we conducted a retrospective cohort study in Boffa prefecture among women who were pregnant in 2012 during or after the vaccination campaign. The primary outcome was pregnancy loss, as reported by the mother, and fetal malformations, after clinical examination. Primary exposure was the intake of the BivWC vaccine (Shanchol) during pregnancy, as determined by a vaccination card or oral history. We compared the risk of pregnancy loss between vaccinated and non-vaccinated women through binomial regression analysis. A total of 2,494 pregnancies were included in the analysis. The crude incidence of pregnancy loss was 3.7% (95%CI 2.7-4.8) for fetuses exposed to BivWC vaccine and 2.6% (0.7-4.5) for non-exposed fetuses. The incidence of malformation was 0.6% (0.1-1.0) and 1.2% (0.0-2.5) in BivWC-exposed and non-exposed fetuses, respectively. In both crude and adjusted analyses, fetal exposure to BivWC was not significantly associated with pregnancy loss (adjusted risk ratio (aRR = 1.09 [95%CI: 0.5-2.25], p = 0.818) or malformations (aRR = 0.50 [95%CI: 0.13-1.91], p = 0.314).
CONCLUSIONS
In this large retrospective cohort study, we found no association between fetal exposure to BivWC and risk of pregnancy loss or malformation. Despite the weaknesses of a retrospective design, we can conclude that if a risk exists, it is very low. Additional prospective studies are warranted to add to the evidence base on OCV use during pregnancy. Pregnant women are particularly vulnerable during cholera episodes and should be included in vaccination campaigns when the risk of cholera is high, such as during outbreaks.
Conference Material > Abstract
Arago M, Mangue M, Cumbi N, Zamudio AG, Loarec A, et al.
MSF Scientific Days International 2021: Innovation. 2021 May 20
WHAT CHALLENGE OR OPPORTUNITY DID YOU TRY TO ADDRESS? WERE EXISTING SOLUTIONS NOT AVAILABLE OR NOT GOOD ENOUGH?
Ototoxicity is an unfortunate side-effect of second-line injectable drugs for drug-resistant tuberculosis (DRTB), including aminoglycosides and peptides. Worldwide, up to 15% of patients on treatment regimens containing these drugs develop a degree of ototoxicity. Patients who experience ototoxicity are generally switched to an oral treatment regimen. Although regular audiological evaluations are recommended for patients receiving these drugs, there is limited access to these services, and few patients with noticeable hearing problems are referred for confirmation and follow-up.
WHY DOES THIS CHALLENGE OR OPPORTUNITY MATTER – WHY SHOULD MSF ADDRESS IT?
Before the introduction of this digital tool, the MSF DRTB project in Mozambique had to refer patients to the Central Hospital in Maputo. This limited the number of patients screened and referred for testing, curtailing the potential to switch treatment early for those showing mild-to-moderate hearing loss.
DESCRIBE YOUR INNOVATION AND WHAT MAKES IT INNOVATIVE
In 2018, the team piloted a way to simplify monitoring of hearing using a clinically approved mobile tablet-based tool that has been found to be comparable with traditional audiometry measurements in children and adults. MSF acquired three kits of CE-marked and FDA-certified iOS-based audiometry kits from SHOEBOX® Audiometry systems. The units were comprised of calibrated headphones and tablet-based software that have acceptable accuracy (±10dB) with 90% sensitivity and specificity. The portable units were deployed in rotation in six health centres over two years; a total of 673 audiometry tests were performed in MSF-supported public health centres in Maputo. Patients were tested at baseline during their first consultation and then monthly while on treatment regimens that included injectable drugs.
WHO WILL BENEFIT (WHOSE LIFE / WORK WILL IT IMPROVE?) AND WERE THEY INVOLVED IN THE DESIGN?
The 2018 Mozambique National TB Committee approved treatment without injectable drugs in patients who had any degree of hearing impairment before the initiation of treatment. Patients screened using the digital tool directly benefitted from switching to oral DRTB treatment if they exhibited any hearing loss, without requiring hospital referral.
WHAT OBJECTIVES DID YOU SET FOR THE PROJECT – WHAT DID YOU WANT TO ACHIEVE AND HOW DID YOU DEFINE AND MEASURE SUCCESS (IMPROVED SERVICE, LOWER COST, BETTER EFFICIENCY, BETTER USER EXPERIENCE, ETC.)?
We describe the implementation and use of a mobile audiometry system for patients with treatment-related ototoxicity in the MSF DRTB project in Mozambique, and consider its potential for easily assessing hearing deterioration in this cohort.
WHAT DATA DID YOU COLLECT TO MEASURE THE INNOVATION AGAINST THESE INDICATORS AND HOW DID YOU COLLECT IT? INCLUDE IF YOU DECIDED TO CHANGE THE INDICATORS AND WHY
Routinely collected data were evaluated.
WERE THERE ANY LIMITATIONS TO THE DATA YOU COLLECTED, HOW YOU COLLECTED IT OR HOW YOU ANALYSED IT, OR WERE THERE ANY UNFORESEEN FACTORS THAT MAY HAVE INTERFERED WITH YOUR RESULTS?
Data were analysed retrospectively from routine records and may not be exhaustive. Separate analysis of baseline and follow-up was not possible.
WHAT RESULTS DID YOU GET?
Of the 673 audiometry tests conducted using the digital tool, 480 (71%) showed normal hearing, 65 (10%) mild hearing loss, 81 (12%) moderate hearing loss, and 47 (7%) severe-to-profound hearing loss.
COMPARING THE RESULTS FROM YOUR DATA ANALYSIS TO YOUR OBJECTIVES, EXPLAIN WHY YOU CONSIDER YOUR INNOVATION A SUCCESS OR FAILURE?
This decentralised approach does not need specialised setup, which may lead to increased screening, proper follow-up, and more potential for early switching of drug regimens.
TO WHAT EXTENT DID THE INNOVATION BENEFIT PEOPLE’S LIVES / WORK?
Decreasing the need for hospital referrals improved time and transport costs for patients.
IS THERE ANYTHING THAT YOU WOULD DO DIFFERENTLY IF YOU WERE TO DO THE WORK AGAIN?:
A cost-benefit analysis to compare the mobile audiometry system to referrals would be beneficial for programmatic decisions.
WHAT ARE THE NEXT STEPS FOR THE INNOVATION ITSELF (SCALE UP, IMPLEMENTATION, FURTHER DEVELOPMENT, DISCONTINUED)?
In December 2019, the project was phased out as there was a protocol change in which injectable drugs were replaced with more potent and fully oral regimens that made monitoring for ototoxicity unnecessary for most patients.
IS THE INNOVATION TRANSFERABLE OR ADAPTABLE TO OTHER SETTINGS OR DOMAINS?
The tools adapted are clinically approved for screening activities for any programmes that deal with hearing loss.
WHAT BROADER IMPLICATIONS ARE THERE FROM THE INNOVATION FOR MSF AND / OR OTHERS (CHANGE IN PRACTICE, CHANGE IN POLICY, CHANGE IN GUIDELINES, PARADIGM SHIFT)?
The project demonstrates the potential to improve follow-up and detect complications early for patients who take ototoxic medications.
WHAT OTHER LEARNINGS FROM YOUR WORK ARE IMPORTANT TO SHARE?
User-friendly and automated audiometry systems that are mobile and do not require audiologists or sound-insulated booths could be extremely useful to various medical projects using potentially ototoxic drugs such as aminoglycosides. They may also be beneficial for environmental projects with noise and toxic pollutions. The high cost of the license could present a limitation necessitating a cost-benefit analysis before contemplating scale-up.
ETHICS
This description and evaluation of an innovation project involved human participants or their data, and has had ethics oversight from Monica Rull, Medical Director, Operational Centre Geneva, MSF.
Ototoxicity is an unfortunate side-effect of second-line injectable drugs for drug-resistant tuberculosis (DRTB), including aminoglycosides and peptides. Worldwide, up to 15% of patients on treatment regimens containing these drugs develop a degree of ototoxicity. Patients who experience ototoxicity are generally switched to an oral treatment regimen. Although regular audiological evaluations are recommended for patients receiving these drugs, there is limited access to these services, and few patients with noticeable hearing problems are referred for confirmation and follow-up.
WHY DOES THIS CHALLENGE OR OPPORTUNITY MATTER – WHY SHOULD MSF ADDRESS IT?
Before the introduction of this digital tool, the MSF DRTB project in Mozambique had to refer patients to the Central Hospital in Maputo. This limited the number of patients screened and referred for testing, curtailing the potential to switch treatment early for those showing mild-to-moderate hearing loss.
DESCRIBE YOUR INNOVATION AND WHAT MAKES IT INNOVATIVE
In 2018, the team piloted a way to simplify monitoring of hearing using a clinically approved mobile tablet-based tool that has been found to be comparable with traditional audiometry measurements in children and adults. MSF acquired three kits of CE-marked and FDA-certified iOS-based audiometry kits from SHOEBOX® Audiometry systems. The units were comprised of calibrated headphones and tablet-based software that have acceptable accuracy (±10dB) with 90% sensitivity and specificity. The portable units were deployed in rotation in six health centres over two years; a total of 673 audiometry tests were performed in MSF-supported public health centres in Maputo. Patients were tested at baseline during their first consultation and then monthly while on treatment regimens that included injectable drugs.
WHO WILL BENEFIT (WHOSE LIFE / WORK WILL IT IMPROVE?) AND WERE THEY INVOLVED IN THE DESIGN?
The 2018 Mozambique National TB Committee approved treatment without injectable drugs in patients who had any degree of hearing impairment before the initiation of treatment. Patients screened using the digital tool directly benefitted from switching to oral DRTB treatment if they exhibited any hearing loss, without requiring hospital referral.
WHAT OBJECTIVES DID YOU SET FOR THE PROJECT – WHAT DID YOU WANT TO ACHIEVE AND HOW DID YOU DEFINE AND MEASURE SUCCESS (IMPROVED SERVICE, LOWER COST, BETTER EFFICIENCY, BETTER USER EXPERIENCE, ETC.)?
We describe the implementation and use of a mobile audiometry system for patients with treatment-related ototoxicity in the MSF DRTB project in Mozambique, and consider its potential for easily assessing hearing deterioration in this cohort.
WHAT DATA DID YOU COLLECT TO MEASURE THE INNOVATION AGAINST THESE INDICATORS AND HOW DID YOU COLLECT IT? INCLUDE IF YOU DECIDED TO CHANGE THE INDICATORS AND WHY
Routinely collected data were evaluated.
WERE THERE ANY LIMITATIONS TO THE DATA YOU COLLECTED, HOW YOU COLLECTED IT OR HOW YOU ANALYSED IT, OR WERE THERE ANY UNFORESEEN FACTORS THAT MAY HAVE INTERFERED WITH YOUR RESULTS?
Data were analysed retrospectively from routine records and may not be exhaustive. Separate analysis of baseline and follow-up was not possible.
WHAT RESULTS DID YOU GET?
Of the 673 audiometry tests conducted using the digital tool, 480 (71%) showed normal hearing, 65 (10%) mild hearing loss, 81 (12%) moderate hearing loss, and 47 (7%) severe-to-profound hearing loss.
COMPARING THE RESULTS FROM YOUR DATA ANALYSIS TO YOUR OBJECTIVES, EXPLAIN WHY YOU CONSIDER YOUR INNOVATION A SUCCESS OR FAILURE?
This decentralised approach does not need specialised setup, which may lead to increased screening, proper follow-up, and more potential for early switching of drug regimens.
TO WHAT EXTENT DID THE INNOVATION BENEFIT PEOPLE’S LIVES / WORK?
Decreasing the need for hospital referrals improved time and transport costs for patients.
IS THERE ANYTHING THAT YOU WOULD DO DIFFERENTLY IF YOU WERE TO DO THE WORK AGAIN?:
A cost-benefit analysis to compare the mobile audiometry system to referrals would be beneficial for programmatic decisions.
WHAT ARE THE NEXT STEPS FOR THE INNOVATION ITSELF (SCALE UP, IMPLEMENTATION, FURTHER DEVELOPMENT, DISCONTINUED)?
In December 2019, the project was phased out as there was a protocol change in which injectable drugs were replaced with more potent and fully oral regimens that made monitoring for ototoxicity unnecessary for most patients.
IS THE INNOVATION TRANSFERABLE OR ADAPTABLE TO OTHER SETTINGS OR DOMAINS?
The tools adapted are clinically approved for screening activities for any programmes that deal with hearing loss.
WHAT BROADER IMPLICATIONS ARE THERE FROM THE INNOVATION FOR MSF AND / OR OTHERS (CHANGE IN PRACTICE, CHANGE IN POLICY, CHANGE IN GUIDELINES, PARADIGM SHIFT)?
The project demonstrates the potential to improve follow-up and detect complications early for patients who take ototoxic medications.
WHAT OTHER LEARNINGS FROM YOUR WORK ARE IMPORTANT TO SHARE?
User-friendly and automated audiometry systems that are mobile and do not require audiologists or sound-insulated booths could be extremely useful to various medical projects using potentially ototoxic drugs such as aminoglycosides. They may also be beneficial for environmental projects with noise and toxic pollutions. The high cost of the license could present a limitation necessitating a cost-benefit analysis before contemplating scale-up.
ETHICS
This description and evaluation of an innovation project involved human participants or their data, and has had ethics oversight from Monica Rull, Medical Director, Operational Centre Geneva, MSF.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
BMC Public Health. 2018 March 20; Volume 18 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1186/s12889-018-5258-3
Etoori D, Kerschberger B, Staderini N, Ndlangamandla M, Nhlabatsi B, et al.
BMC Public Health. 2018 March 20; Volume 18 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1186/s12889-018-5258-3
Background
Universal antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all pregnant/ breastfeeding women living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), known as Prevention of mother-to child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) Option B+ (PMTCTB+), is being scaled up in most countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. In the transition to PMTCTB+, many countries face challenges with proper implementation of the HIV care cascade. We aimed to describe the feasibility of a PMTCTB+ approach in the public health sector in Swaziland.
Methods
Lifelong ART was offered to a cohort of HIV+ pregnant women aged ≥16 years at the first antenatal care (ANC1) visit in 9 public sector facilities, between 01/2013 and 06/2014. The study enrolment period was divided into 3 phases (early: 01–06/2013, mid: 07–12/2013 and late: 01–06/2014) to account for temporal trends. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional-hazards regression models were applied for ART initiation and attrition analyses.
Results
Of 665 HIV+ pregnant women, 496 (74.6%) initiated ART. ART initiation increased in later study enrolment phases (mid: aHR: 1.41; later: aHR: 2.36), and decreased at CD4 ≥ 500 (aHR: 0.69). 52.9% were retained in care at 24 months. Attrition was associated with ANC1 in the third trimester (aHR: 2.37), attending a secondary care facility (aHR: 1.98) and ART initiation during later enrolment phases (mid aHR: 1.48; late aHR: 1.67). Of 373 women eligible, 67.3% received a first VL. 223/251 (88.8%) were virologically suppressed (< 1000 copies/mL). Of 670 infants, 53.6% received an EID test, 320/359 had a test result recorded and of whom 7 (2.2%) were HIV+.
Conclusions
PMTCTB+ was found to be feasible in this setting, with high rates of maternal viral suppression and low transmission to the infant. High treatment attrition, poor follow-up of mother-baby pairs and under-utilisation of VL and EID testing are important programmatic challenges.
Universal antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all pregnant/ breastfeeding women living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), known as Prevention of mother-to child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) Option B+ (PMTCTB+), is being scaled up in most countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. In the transition to PMTCTB+, many countries face challenges with proper implementation of the HIV care cascade. We aimed to describe the feasibility of a PMTCTB+ approach in the public health sector in Swaziland.
Methods
Lifelong ART was offered to a cohort of HIV+ pregnant women aged ≥16 years at the first antenatal care (ANC1) visit in 9 public sector facilities, between 01/2013 and 06/2014. The study enrolment period was divided into 3 phases (early: 01–06/2013, mid: 07–12/2013 and late: 01–06/2014) to account for temporal trends. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional-hazards regression models were applied for ART initiation and attrition analyses.
Results
Of 665 HIV+ pregnant women, 496 (74.6%) initiated ART. ART initiation increased in later study enrolment phases (mid: aHR: 1.41; later: aHR: 2.36), and decreased at CD4 ≥ 500 (aHR: 0.69). 52.9% were retained in care at 24 months. Attrition was associated with ANC1 in the third trimester (aHR: 2.37), attending a secondary care facility (aHR: 1.98) and ART initiation during later enrolment phases (mid aHR: 1.48; late aHR: 1.67). Of 373 women eligible, 67.3% received a first VL. 223/251 (88.8%) were virologically suppressed (< 1000 copies/mL). Of 670 infants, 53.6% received an EID test, 320/359 had a test result recorded and of whom 7 (2.2%) were HIV+.
Conclusions
PMTCTB+ was found to be feasible in this setting, with high rates of maternal viral suppression and low transmission to the infant. High treatment attrition, poor follow-up of mother-baby pairs and under-utilisation of VL and EID testing are important programmatic challenges.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Infect Agent Cancer. 2021 January 7; Volume 16 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1186/s13027-020-00341-4
Coldiron ME, Gutierrez Zamudio AG, Manuel R, Luciano G, Rusch B, et al.
Infect Agent Cancer. 2021 January 7; Volume 16 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1186/s13027-020-00341-4
BACKGROUND
Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) is a common HIV-associated malignancy frequently associated with poor outcomes. It is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in major cities of Mozambique. Antiretroviral therapy is the cornerstone of KS treatment, but many patients require cytotoxic chemotherapy. The traditional regimen in Mozambique includes conventional doxorubicin, bleomycin and vincristine, which is poorly tolerated. In 2016, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin was introduced at a specialized outpatient center in Maputo, Mozambique.
METHODS
We performed a prospective, single-arm, open-label observational study to demonstrate the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of treatment with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with AIDS-associated Kaposi sarcoma (KS) in a low-resource setting. Chemotherapy-naïve adults with AIDS-associated KS (T1 or T0 not responding to 6 months of antiretroviral therapy) were eligible if they were willing to follow up for 2 years. Patients with Karnofsky scores < 50 or contraindications to PLD were excluded. One hundred eighty-three patients were screened and 116 participants were enrolled. Patients received PLD on three-week cycles until meeting clinical stopping criteria. Follow-up visits monitored HIV status, KS disease, side effects of chemotherapy, mental health (PHQ-9) and quality of life (SF-12). Primary outcome measures included vital status and disease status at 6, 12, and 24 months after enrollment.
RESULTS
At 24 months, 23 participants (20%) had died and 15 (13%) were lost to follow-up. Baseline CD4 < 100 was associated with death (HR 2.7, 95%CI [1.2–6.2], p = 0.016), as was T1S1 disease compared to T1S0 disease (HR 2.7, 95%CI [1.1–6.4], p = 0.023). Ninety-two participants achieved complete or partial remission at any point (overall response rate 80%), including 15 (13%) who achieved complete remission. PLD was well-tolerated, and the most common AEs were neutropenia and anemia. Quality of life improved rapidly after beginning PLD.
DISCUSSION
PLD was safe, well-tolerated and effective as first-line treatment of KS in Mozambique. High mortality was likely due to advanced immunosuppression at presentation, underscoring the importance of earlier screening and referral for KS.
Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) is a common HIV-associated malignancy frequently associated with poor outcomes. It is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in major cities of Mozambique. Antiretroviral therapy is the cornerstone of KS treatment, but many patients require cytotoxic chemotherapy. The traditional regimen in Mozambique includes conventional doxorubicin, bleomycin and vincristine, which is poorly tolerated. In 2016, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin was introduced at a specialized outpatient center in Maputo, Mozambique.
METHODS
We performed a prospective, single-arm, open-label observational study to demonstrate the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of treatment with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with AIDS-associated Kaposi sarcoma (KS) in a low-resource setting. Chemotherapy-naïve adults with AIDS-associated KS (T1 or T0 not responding to 6 months of antiretroviral therapy) were eligible if they were willing to follow up for 2 years. Patients with Karnofsky scores < 50 or contraindications to PLD were excluded. One hundred eighty-three patients were screened and 116 participants were enrolled. Patients received PLD on three-week cycles until meeting clinical stopping criteria. Follow-up visits monitored HIV status, KS disease, side effects of chemotherapy, mental health (PHQ-9) and quality of life (SF-12). Primary outcome measures included vital status and disease status at 6, 12, and 24 months after enrollment.
RESULTS
At 24 months, 23 participants (20%) had died and 15 (13%) were lost to follow-up. Baseline CD4 < 100 was associated with death (HR 2.7, 95%CI [1.2–6.2], p = 0.016), as was T1S1 disease compared to T1S0 disease (HR 2.7, 95%CI [1.1–6.4], p = 0.023). Ninety-two participants achieved complete or partial remission at any point (overall response rate 80%), including 15 (13%) who achieved complete remission. PLD was well-tolerated, and the most common AEs were neutropenia and anemia. Quality of life improved rapidly after beginning PLD.
DISCUSSION
PLD was safe, well-tolerated and effective as first-line treatment of KS in Mozambique. High mortality was likely due to advanced immunosuppression at presentation, underscoring the importance of earlier screening and referral for KS.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
PLOS Med. 2020 November 19; Volume 17 (Issue 11); e1003378.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003378
Asgary R, Staderini N, Mthethwa-Hleza S, Lopez Saavedra PA, Garcia Abrego L, et al.
PLOS Med. 2020 November 19; Volume 17 (Issue 11); e1003378.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003378
BACKGROUND
Cervical cancer is among the most common preventable cancers with the highest morbidity and mortality. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) as cervical cancer screening strategy in resource-poor settings. However, there are barriers to the sustainability of VIA programs including declining providers’ VIA competence without mentorship and quality assurances and challenges of integration into primary healthcare. This study seeks to evaluate the impact of smartphone-based strategies in improving reliability, reproducibility, and quality of VIA in humanitarian settings.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
We implemented smartphone-based VIA that included standard VIA training, adapted refresher, and 6-month mHealth mentorship, sequentially, in the rural Shiselweni region of Eswatini. A remote expert reviewer provided diagnostic and management feedback on patients’ cervical images, which were reviewed weekly by nurses. Program’s outcomes, VIA image agreement rates, and Kappa statistic were compared before, during, and after training. From September 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018, 4,247 patients underwent screening; 247 were reviewed weekly by a VIA diagnostic expert. Of the 247, 128 (49%) were HIV–positive; mean age was 30.80 years (standard deviation [SD]: 7.74 years). Initial VIA positivity of 16% (436/2,637) after standard training gradually increased to 25.1% (293/1,168), dropped to an average of 9.7% (143/1,469) with a lowest of 7% (20/284) after refresher in 2017 (p = 0.001), increased again to an average of 9.6% (240/2,488) with a highest of 17% (17/100) before the start of mentorship, and dropped to an average of 8.3% (134/1,610) in 2018 with an average of 6.3% (37/591) after the start of mentorship (p = 0.019). Overall, 88% were eligible for and 68% received cryotherapy the same day: 10 cases were clinically suspicious for cancer; however, only 5 of those cases were confirmed using punch biopsy. Agreement rates with the expert reviewer for positive and negative cases were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79.4% to 100%) and 95.7% (95% CI: 92.2% to 97.9%), respectively, with negative predictive value (NPV) (100%), positive predictive value (PPV) (63.5%), and area under the curve of receiver operating characteristics (AUC ROC) (0.978). Kappa statistic was 0.74 (95% CI; 0.58 to 0.89); 0.64 and 0.79 at 3 and 6 months, respectively. In logistic regression, HIV and age were associated with VIA positivity (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR]: 3.53, 95% CI: 1.10 to 11.29; p = 0.033 and aOR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.0004 to 1.13; p = 0.048, respectively). We were unable to incorporate a control arm due to logistical constraints in routine humanitarian settings.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that smartphone mentorship provided experiential learning to improve nurses’ competencies and VIA reliability and reproducibility, reduced false positive, and introduced peer-to-peer education and quality control services. Local collaboration; extending services to remote populations; decreasing unnecessary burden to screened women, providers, and tertiary centers; and capacity building through low-tech high-yield screening are promising strategies for scale-up of VIA programs.
Cervical cancer is among the most common preventable cancers with the highest morbidity and mortality. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) as cervical cancer screening strategy in resource-poor settings. However, there are barriers to the sustainability of VIA programs including declining providers’ VIA competence without mentorship and quality assurances and challenges of integration into primary healthcare. This study seeks to evaluate the impact of smartphone-based strategies in improving reliability, reproducibility, and quality of VIA in humanitarian settings.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
We implemented smartphone-based VIA that included standard VIA training, adapted refresher, and 6-month mHealth mentorship, sequentially, in the rural Shiselweni region of Eswatini. A remote expert reviewer provided diagnostic and management feedback on patients’ cervical images, which were reviewed weekly by nurses. Program’s outcomes, VIA image agreement rates, and Kappa statistic were compared before, during, and after training. From September 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018, 4,247 patients underwent screening; 247 were reviewed weekly by a VIA diagnostic expert. Of the 247, 128 (49%) were HIV–positive; mean age was 30.80 years (standard deviation [SD]: 7.74 years). Initial VIA positivity of 16% (436/2,637) after standard training gradually increased to 25.1% (293/1,168), dropped to an average of 9.7% (143/1,469) with a lowest of 7% (20/284) after refresher in 2017 (p = 0.001), increased again to an average of 9.6% (240/2,488) with a highest of 17% (17/100) before the start of mentorship, and dropped to an average of 8.3% (134/1,610) in 2018 with an average of 6.3% (37/591) after the start of mentorship (p = 0.019). Overall, 88% were eligible for and 68% received cryotherapy the same day: 10 cases were clinically suspicious for cancer; however, only 5 of those cases were confirmed using punch biopsy. Agreement rates with the expert reviewer for positive and negative cases were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79.4% to 100%) and 95.7% (95% CI: 92.2% to 97.9%), respectively, with negative predictive value (NPV) (100%), positive predictive value (PPV) (63.5%), and area under the curve of receiver operating characteristics (AUC ROC) (0.978). Kappa statistic was 0.74 (95% CI; 0.58 to 0.89); 0.64 and 0.79 at 3 and 6 months, respectively. In logistic regression, HIV and age were associated with VIA positivity (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR]: 3.53, 95% CI: 1.10 to 11.29; p = 0.033 and aOR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.0004 to 1.13; p = 0.048, respectively). We were unable to incorporate a control arm due to logistical constraints in routine humanitarian settings.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that smartphone mentorship provided experiential learning to improve nurses’ competencies and VIA reliability and reproducibility, reduced false positive, and introduced peer-to-peer education and quality control services. Local collaboration; extending services to remote populations; decreasing unnecessary burden to screened women, providers, and tertiary centers; and capacity building through low-tech high-yield screening are promising strategies for scale-up of VIA programs.
Conference Material > Slide Presentation
Arago M, Mangue M, Cumbi N, Zamudio AG, Loarec A, et al.
MSF Scientific Days International 2021: Innovation. 2021 May 20
Journal Article > Short ReportFull Text
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 March 11; Volume 69 (Issue 10); 1809-1811.; DOI:10.1093/cid/ciz196
Bastard M, Molfino L, Mutaquiha C, Galindo MA, Zindoga P, et al.
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 March 11; Volume 69 (Issue 10); 1809-1811.; DOI:10.1093/cid/ciz196
Bedaquiline was recommended by WHO as the preferred option in treatment of MDR-TB patients with long regimen. However, no recommendation was given for the short MDR-TB regimen. Data from our small cohort of patients who switched injectable dug to bedaquiline suggest that bedaquiline based short regimen is effective and safe.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
J Int AIDS Soc. 2020 March 3; Volume 23 (Issue 3); DOI:10.1002/jia2.25458
Kerschberger B, Schomaker M, Jobanputra K, Kabore SM, Teck R, et al.
J Int AIDS Soc. 2020 March 3; Volume 23 (Issue 3); DOI:10.1002/jia2.25458
INTRODUCTION:
The Treat-All policy - antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation irrespective of CD4 cell criteria - increases access to treatment. Many ART programmes, however, reported increasing attrition and viral failure during treatment expansion, questioning the programmatic feasibility of Treat-All in resource-limited settings. We aimed to describe and compare programmatic outcomes between Treat-All and standard of care (SOC) in the public sectors of Eswatini.
METHODS:
This is a prospective cohort study of ≥16-year-old HIV-positive patients initiated on first-line ART under Treat-All and SOC in 18 health facilities of the Shiselweni region, from October 2014 to March 2016. SOC followed the CD4 350 and 500 cells/mm3 treatment eligibility thresholds. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to describe crude programmatic outcomes. Multivariate flexible parametric survival models were built to assess associations of time from ART initiation with the composite unfavourable outcome of all-cause attrition and viral failure.
RESULTS:
Of the 3170 patients, 1888 (59.6%) initiated ART under Treat-All at a median CD4 cell count of 329 (IQR 168 to 488) cells/mm3 compared with 292 (IQR 161 to 430) (p < 0.001) under SOC. Although crude programme retention at 36 months tended to be lower under Treat-All (71%) than SOC (75%) (p = 0.002), it was similar in covariate-adjusted analysis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.06, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.23). The hazard of viral suppression was higher for Treat-All (aHR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.23), while the hazard of viral failure was comparable (Treat-All: aHR 0.89, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.49). Among patients with advanced HIV disease (n = 1080), those under Treat-All (aHR 1.13, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.44) had a similar risk of an composite unfavourable outcome to SOC. Factors increasing the risk of the composite unfavourable outcome under both interventions were aged 16 to 24 years, being unmarried, anaemia, ART initiation on the same day as HIV care enrolment and CD4 ≤ 100 cells/mm3 . Under Treat-All only, the risk of the unfavourable outcome was higher for pregnant women, WHO III/IV clinical stage and elevated creatinine.
CONCLUSIONS:
Compared to SOC, Treat-All resulted in comparable retention, improved viral suppression and comparable composite outcomes of retention without viral failure.
The Treat-All policy - antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation irrespective of CD4 cell criteria - increases access to treatment. Many ART programmes, however, reported increasing attrition and viral failure during treatment expansion, questioning the programmatic feasibility of Treat-All in resource-limited settings. We aimed to describe and compare programmatic outcomes between Treat-All and standard of care (SOC) in the public sectors of Eswatini.
METHODS:
This is a prospective cohort study of ≥16-year-old HIV-positive patients initiated on first-line ART under Treat-All and SOC in 18 health facilities of the Shiselweni region, from October 2014 to March 2016. SOC followed the CD4 350 and 500 cells/mm3 treatment eligibility thresholds. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to describe crude programmatic outcomes. Multivariate flexible parametric survival models were built to assess associations of time from ART initiation with the composite unfavourable outcome of all-cause attrition and viral failure.
RESULTS:
Of the 3170 patients, 1888 (59.6%) initiated ART under Treat-All at a median CD4 cell count of 329 (IQR 168 to 488) cells/mm3 compared with 292 (IQR 161 to 430) (p < 0.001) under SOC. Although crude programme retention at 36 months tended to be lower under Treat-All (71%) than SOC (75%) (p = 0.002), it was similar in covariate-adjusted analysis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.06, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.23). The hazard of viral suppression was higher for Treat-All (aHR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.23), while the hazard of viral failure was comparable (Treat-All: aHR 0.89, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.49). Among patients with advanced HIV disease (n = 1080), those under Treat-All (aHR 1.13, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.44) had a similar risk of an composite unfavourable outcome to SOC. Factors increasing the risk of the composite unfavourable outcome under both interventions were aged 16 to 24 years, being unmarried, anaemia, ART initiation on the same day as HIV care enrolment and CD4 ≤ 100 cells/mm3 . Under Treat-All only, the risk of the unfavourable outcome was higher for pregnant women, WHO III/IV clinical stage and elevated creatinine.
CONCLUSIONS:
Compared to SOC, Treat-All resulted in comparable retention, improved viral suppression and comparable composite outcomes of retention without viral failure.
Conference Material > Abstract
Kerschberger B, Ntshalintshali N, Maphalala G, Aung A, Mamba C, et al.
MSF Scientific Days International 2021: Research. 2021 May 19
INTRODUCTION
Acute HIV infection (AHI) is rarely diagnosed in resource-limited settings. Barriers to diagnosis include the high costs of viral load (VL)-based diagnostic testing algorithms and lack of
availability of reliable point-of-care (POC) tests. We assessed the performance of a new POC test for the detection of AHI in Eswatini, Alere™ HIV-Combo.
METHODS
Adult outpatients testing HIV-negative on Alere™ Determine through finger-prick testing by lay counselors, or with discordant result (Alere™ Determine-positive and Uni-Gold™-negative)
were enrolled at the Nhlangano Health Centre, between March 2019 and March 2020. Participants were then tested with the quantitative Xpert HIV-1 VL assay, used as the gold standard
test for AHI. AHI was defined as a VL result ≥40 copies/mL. Leftover paired venous whole blood and plasma specimens were tested with the lateral flow fourth-generation antibody/p24 POC Alere™ HIV-Combo. Both Xpert and HIV-Combo tests were performed in the laboratory by a laboratory technician. A positive result for AHI using the HIV-Combo test was defined as reactivity on the p24 antigen and/or antibody bars. Diagnostic test characteristics were evaluated for plasma (HIV-Comboplasma) and whole blood (HIV-Combo-wb), as compared with the results of Xpert testing.
ETHICS
This study was approved by the MSF Ethics Review Board and the Eswatini Ethics Committee.
RESULTS
A total of 745 (HIV-Combo-plasma/Xpert) and 429 (HIV-Combowb/ Xpert) paired test results were available. 29/745 (3.9%) and 19/429 (4.4%) were AHI-positive based on the results of Xpert testing. 26/745 (3.5%) were reactive on HIV-Combo-plasma and 16 (3.7%) on HIV-Combo-wb. Most positive test results with HIV-Combo showed reactivity to antibodies only (76.9% HIV-Combo-plasma; 75.0% HIV-Combo-wb), and the remainder to p24 antigen (15.4%, 18.8%) only, or both p24 antigen and antibodies (7.7%, 6.3%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.93 for HIV-Combo-plasma and 0.89 for HIV-Combo-wb. Test sensitivity tended to be slightly higher for HIV-Combo-plasma (86.2%) as compared to HIV-Combo-wb (78.9%), and specificity was high for both tests (≥99.8%). The negative predictive value was above 99.0% for both tests, and positive predictive values were 93.8% for HIV-Combo-wb and 96.2% for HIV-Combo-plasma.
CONCLUSION
Lateral flow POC HIV-Combo testing in this setting was able to diagnose most cases of AHI, in comparison to the gold standard. This test therefore has potential for use in routine settings due to low cost and ease of use. However, further studies are needed to evaluate its performance when used in routine outpatient care settings by lay counselors on finger-prick samples.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
None declared.
Acute HIV infection (AHI) is rarely diagnosed in resource-limited settings. Barriers to diagnosis include the high costs of viral load (VL)-based diagnostic testing algorithms and lack of
availability of reliable point-of-care (POC) tests. We assessed the performance of a new POC test for the detection of AHI in Eswatini, Alere™ HIV-Combo.
METHODS
Adult outpatients testing HIV-negative on Alere™ Determine through finger-prick testing by lay counselors, or with discordant result (Alere™ Determine-positive and Uni-Gold™-negative)
were enrolled at the Nhlangano Health Centre, between March 2019 and March 2020. Participants were then tested with the quantitative Xpert HIV-1 VL assay, used as the gold standard
test for AHI. AHI was defined as a VL result ≥40 copies/mL. Leftover paired venous whole blood and plasma specimens were tested with the lateral flow fourth-generation antibody/p24 POC Alere™ HIV-Combo. Both Xpert and HIV-Combo tests were performed in the laboratory by a laboratory technician. A positive result for AHI using the HIV-Combo test was defined as reactivity on the p24 antigen and/or antibody bars. Diagnostic test characteristics were evaluated for plasma (HIV-Comboplasma) and whole blood (HIV-Combo-wb), as compared with the results of Xpert testing.
ETHICS
This study was approved by the MSF Ethics Review Board and the Eswatini Ethics Committee.
RESULTS
A total of 745 (HIV-Combo-plasma/Xpert) and 429 (HIV-Combowb/ Xpert) paired test results were available. 29/745 (3.9%) and 19/429 (4.4%) were AHI-positive based on the results of Xpert testing. 26/745 (3.5%) were reactive on HIV-Combo-plasma and 16 (3.7%) on HIV-Combo-wb. Most positive test results with HIV-Combo showed reactivity to antibodies only (76.9% HIV-Combo-plasma; 75.0% HIV-Combo-wb), and the remainder to p24 antigen (15.4%, 18.8%) only, or both p24 antigen and antibodies (7.7%, 6.3%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.93 for HIV-Combo-plasma and 0.89 for HIV-Combo-wb. Test sensitivity tended to be slightly higher for HIV-Combo-plasma (86.2%) as compared to HIV-Combo-wb (78.9%), and specificity was high for both tests (≥99.8%). The negative predictive value was above 99.0% for both tests, and positive predictive values were 93.8% for HIV-Combo-wb and 96.2% for HIV-Combo-plasma.
CONCLUSION
Lateral flow POC HIV-Combo testing in this setting was able to diagnose most cases of AHI, in comparison to the gold standard. This test therefore has potential for use in routine settings due to low cost and ease of use. However, further studies are needed to evaluate its performance when used in routine outpatient care settings by lay counselors on finger-prick samples.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
None declared.