Journal Article > LetterFull Text
Lancet Global Health. 2014 August 19; Volume 2 (Issue 8); DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70252-9
Dorlo TPC, Balasegaram M
Lancet Global Health. 2014 August 19; Volume 2 (Issue 8); DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70252-9
Journal Article > ReviewAbstract Only
Lancet Infect Dis. 2024 January 1; Volume 24 (Issue 1); e36-e46.; DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00353-5
van Griensven J, Dorlo TPC, Diro EGJ, Costa CH, Burza S
Lancet Infect Dis. 2024 January 1; Volume 24 (Issue 1); e36-e46.; DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00353-5
For the past 15 years, trials of combination therapy options for visceral leishmaniasis have been conducted with the aim of identifying effective, and safe treatment regimens that were shorter than existing monotherapy regimens and could also prevent or delay the emergence of drug resistance. Although first-line treatment currently relies on combination therapy in east Africa, this is not true in Latin America owing to disappointing trial results, with lower than expected efficacy seen for the combination treatment group. By contrast, several effective combination therapy regimens have been identified through trials on the Indian subcontinent; yet, first-line therapy is still AmBisome monotherapy as the drug is part of a free donation programme and is highly effective in this region. Achieving a short all-oral combination treatment will require new chemical entities, several of which are currently under evaluation. Future studies should systematically include pharmacological substudies to ensure optimal dosing for all patient groups. To achieve maximal impact of new combination treatments, mechanisms to ensure drug availability and access after trials should be established. Enhancing the longevity of current and novel treatments will require effective systems for early detection of emerging drug resistance.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 September 14; Volume 10 (Issue 9); DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0004880
Wassuna M, Njenga SN, Balasegaram M, Alexander N, Omollo R, et al.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 September 14; Volume 10 (Issue 9); DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0004880
SSG&PM over 17 days is recommended as first line treatment for visceral leishmaniasis in eastern Africa, but is painful and requires hospitalization. Combination regimens including AmBisome and miltefosine are safe and effective in India, but there are no published data from trials of combination therapies including these drugs from Africa.
Conference Material > Abstract
Fahal AH, Ahmed ES, Bakhiet SM, Bakheet OE, Fahal LA, et al.
MSF Scientific Day International 2024. 2024 May 16; DOI:10.57740/jZnxUIaJi7
INTRODUCTION
Treatment options for the highly neglected fungal tropical disease eumycetoma are limited and poorly adapted to patients’ contexts, with surgery often required. The first-line treatment, itraconazole, thought to be 40% effective, must be taken twice daily for ≥12 months with food, making adherence difficult. An effective, affordable, context-appropriate treatment is urgently needed. The Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi) repurposed the broad-spectrum antifungal agent fosravuconazole, developed by Eisai Ltd for onychomycosis. We aimed to compare two different doses of weekly fosravuconazole with standard-of-care daily itraconazole in patients with eumycetoma.
METHODS
This phase 2, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, superiority trial was done at the Mycetoma Research Centre, Soba University Hospital, Sudan. Patients aged ≥15 years with a small-to-medium lesion (≥2 to <16 cm) caused by M mycetomatis requiring surgery were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive either 300 mg fosravuconazole weekly (group 1), 200 mg fosravuconazole weekly (group 2), or 400 mg itraconazole daily (group 3), for 12 months, together with surgery at 6 months in all groups. The primary efficacy endpoint, assessed in all patients receiving at least one dose of study drug (modified intention to treat), was complete cure at 12 months (absence of eumycetoma mass and sinuses and discharge with normal imaging; or a negative fungal culture if mass present). Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03086226).
RESULTS
Between 9 May, 2017, and 10 June, 2021, 104 patients were randomised (34 to group 1, 34 to group 2, and 36 to group 3).Median age was 29.0 (IQR22.0–33.0), 23.0 (20.0–29.0) and 24.5 (19.5–33.0) years for Groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Complete cure rates at end of treatment were 50.0% (95% CI 32.4–67.6), 64.7% (46.5–80.3), and 75.0% (57.8–87.9) with Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively, showing no superiority of fosravuconazole over the standard-of-care (p=0.030 for Group 2 vs Group 3; and p=0.347 for Group 1 vs Group 3; with significance level set at 0.022). Treatment-emergent adverse drug reactions were reported in one (3%) of 34 patients in group 2 (nausea or vomiting) and three (8%) of 36 patients in group 3 (cortisol decreased, QT prolonged).
CONCLUSION
Although not superior, fosravuconazole 200 mg seemed to have similar efficacy to itraconazole, coupled with advantages such as a weekly, not daily, administration, no food effect, and low risk for drug-drug interactions. An early access programme is under review by authorities in Sudan and a regulatory dossier and global access plan are under preparation.
Treatment options for the highly neglected fungal tropical disease eumycetoma are limited and poorly adapted to patients’ contexts, with surgery often required. The first-line treatment, itraconazole, thought to be 40% effective, must be taken twice daily for ≥12 months with food, making adherence difficult. An effective, affordable, context-appropriate treatment is urgently needed. The Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi) repurposed the broad-spectrum antifungal agent fosravuconazole, developed by Eisai Ltd for onychomycosis. We aimed to compare two different doses of weekly fosravuconazole with standard-of-care daily itraconazole in patients with eumycetoma.
METHODS
This phase 2, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, superiority trial was done at the Mycetoma Research Centre, Soba University Hospital, Sudan. Patients aged ≥15 years with a small-to-medium lesion (≥2 to <16 cm) caused by M mycetomatis requiring surgery were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive either 300 mg fosravuconazole weekly (group 1), 200 mg fosravuconazole weekly (group 2), or 400 mg itraconazole daily (group 3), for 12 months, together with surgery at 6 months in all groups. The primary efficacy endpoint, assessed in all patients receiving at least one dose of study drug (modified intention to treat), was complete cure at 12 months (absence of eumycetoma mass and sinuses and discharge with normal imaging; or a negative fungal culture if mass present). Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03086226).
RESULTS
Between 9 May, 2017, and 10 June, 2021, 104 patients were randomised (34 to group 1, 34 to group 2, and 36 to group 3).Median age was 29.0 (IQR22.0–33.0), 23.0 (20.0–29.0) and 24.5 (19.5–33.0) years for Groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Complete cure rates at end of treatment were 50.0% (95% CI 32.4–67.6), 64.7% (46.5–80.3), and 75.0% (57.8–87.9) with Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively, showing no superiority of fosravuconazole over the standard-of-care (p=0.030 for Group 2 vs Group 3; and p=0.347 for Group 1 vs Group 3; with significance level set at 0.022). Treatment-emergent adverse drug reactions were reported in one (3%) of 34 patients in group 2 (nausea or vomiting) and three (8%) of 36 patients in group 3 (cortisol decreased, QT prolonged).
CONCLUSION
Although not superior, fosravuconazole 200 mg seemed to have similar efficacy to itraconazole, coupled with advantages such as a weekly, not daily, administration, no food effect, and low risk for drug-drug interactions. An early access programme is under review by authorities in Sudan and a regulatory dossier and global access plan are under preparation.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023 September 20; Online ahead of print; dkad286.; DOI:10.1093/jac/dkad286
Verrest L, Roseboom IC, Wasunna M, Mbui J, Njenga SN, et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023 September 20; Online ahead of print; dkad286.; DOI:10.1093/jac/dkad286
OBJECTIVES
To improve visceral leishmaniasis (VL) treatment in Eastern Africa, 14- and 28-day combination regimens of paromomycin plus allometrically dosed miltefosine were evaluated. As the majority of patients affected by VL are children, adequate paediatric exposure to miltefosine and paromomycin is key to ensuring good treatment response.
METHODS
Pharmacokinetic data were collected in a multicentre randomized controlled trial in VL patients from Kenya, Sudan, Ethiopia and Uganda. Patients received paromomycin (20 mg/kg/day for 14 days) plus miltefosine (allometric dose for 14 or 28 days). Population pharmacokinetic models were developed. Adequacy of exposure and target attainment of paromomycin and miltefosine were evaluated in children and adults.
RESULTS
Data from 265 patients (59% =12 years) were available for this pharmacokinetic analysis. Paromomycin exposure was lower in paediatric patients compared with adults [median (IQR) end-of-treatment AUC0–24h 187 (162–203) and 242 (217–328) µg·h/mL, respectively], but were both within the IQR of end-of-treatment exposure in Kenyan and Sudanese adult patients from a previous study. Cumulative miltefosine end-of-treatment exposure in paediatric patients and adults [AUCD0–28 517 (464–552) and 524 (456–567) µg·day/mL, respectively] and target attainment [time above the in vitro susceptibility value EC90 27 (25–28) and 30 (28–32) days, respectively] were comparable to previously observed values in adults.
CONCLUSIONS
Paromomycin and miltefosine exposure in this new combination regimen corresponded to the desirable levels of exposure, supporting the implementation of the shortened 14 day combination regimen. Moreover, the lack of a clear exposure–response and exposure–toxicity relationship indicated adequate exposure within the therapeutic range in the studied population, including paediatric patients.
To improve visceral leishmaniasis (VL) treatment in Eastern Africa, 14- and 28-day combination regimens of paromomycin plus allometrically dosed miltefosine were evaluated. As the majority of patients affected by VL are children, adequate paediatric exposure to miltefosine and paromomycin is key to ensuring good treatment response.
METHODS
Pharmacokinetic data were collected in a multicentre randomized controlled trial in VL patients from Kenya, Sudan, Ethiopia and Uganda. Patients received paromomycin (20 mg/kg/day for 14 days) plus miltefosine (allometric dose for 14 or 28 days). Population pharmacokinetic models were developed. Adequacy of exposure and target attainment of paromomycin and miltefosine were evaluated in children and adults.
RESULTS
Data from 265 patients (59% =12 years) were available for this pharmacokinetic analysis. Paromomycin exposure was lower in paediatric patients compared with adults [median (IQR) end-of-treatment AUC0–24h 187 (162–203) and 242 (217–328) µg·h/mL, respectively], but were both within the IQR of end-of-treatment exposure in Kenyan and Sudanese adult patients from a previous study. Cumulative miltefosine end-of-treatment exposure in paediatric patients and adults [AUCD0–28 517 (464–552) and 524 (456–567) µg·day/mL, respectively] and target attainment [time above the in vitro susceptibility value EC90 27 (25–28) and 30 (28–32) days, respectively] were comparable to previously observed values in adults.
CONCLUSIONS
Paromomycin and miltefosine exposure in this new combination regimen corresponded to the desirable levels of exposure, supporting the implementation of the shortened 14 day combination regimen. Moreover, the lack of a clear exposure–response and exposure–toxicity relationship indicated adequate exposure within the therapeutic range in the studied population, including paediatric patients.
Protocol > Research Study
Hailu ADE, Diro EGJ, Kolja S, Ritmeijer KKD, Yifru S, et al.
2018 July 1
General Objectives
The overall objective of this trial is to identify a safe and effective treatment for VL in HIV coinfected
patients.
Primary Objective:
To evaluate at day 29 assessment the efficacy of a combination regimen of AmBisome®
+
miltefosine and AmBisome®
monotherapy in Ethiopian co-infected HIV + VL patients.
Secondary Objectives:
1. To evaluate relapse-free survival at day 390 (after initial cure at day 29 or cure at day 58 after
extended treatment).
2. To assess safety of the regimens.
Other objectives:
1.To evaluate of viral load and CD4 count in all patients
2. To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ARV, Ambisome and miltefosine and immune function
markers in a subset of patients
The overall objective of this trial is to identify a safe and effective treatment for VL in HIV coinfected
patients.
Primary Objective:
To evaluate at day 29 assessment the efficacy of a combination regimen of AmBisome®
+
miltefosine and AmBisome®
monotherapy in Ethiopian co-infected HIV + VL patients.
Secondary Objectives:
1. To evaluate relapse-free survival at day 390 (after initial cure at day 29 or cure at day 58 after
extended treatment).
2. To assess safety of the regimens.
Other objectives:
1.To evaluate of viral load and CD4 count in all patients
2. To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ARV, Ambisome and miltefosine and immune function
markers in a subset of patients
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 September 27; Online ahead of print; ciac643.; DOI:10.1093/cid/ciac643
Musa AM, Mbui J, Mohammed R, Olobo J, Ritmeijer KKD, et al.
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 September 27; Online ahead of print; ciac643.; DOI:10.1093/cid/ciac643
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to determine whether paromomycin plus miltefosine (PM/MF) is noninferior to sodium stibogluconate plus paromomycin (SSG/PM) for treatment of primary visceral leishmaniasis in eastern Africa.
METHODS
An open-label, phase 3, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in adult and pediatric patients at 7 sites in eastern Africa. Patients were randomly assigned to either 20 mg/kg paromomycin plus allometric dose of miltefosine (14 days), or 20 mg/kg sodium stibogluconate plus 15 mg/kg paromomycin (17 days). The primary endpoint was definitive cure after 6 months.
RESULTS
Of 439 randomized patients, 424 completed the trial. Definitive cure at 6 months was 91.2% (155 of 170) and 91.8% (156 of 170) in the PM/MF and SSG/PM arms in primary efficacy modified intention-to-treat analysis (difference, 0.6%; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], -6.2 to 7.4), narrowly missing the noninferiority margin of 7%. In the per-protocol analysis, efficacy was 92% (149 of 162) and 91.7% (155 of 169) in the PM/MF and SSG/PM arms (difference, -0.3%; 97.5% CI, –7.0 to 6.5), demonstrating noninferiority. Treatments were well tolerated. Four of 18 serious adverse events were study drug–related, and 1 death was SSG-related. Allometric dosing ensured similar MF exposure in children (< 12 years) and adults.
CONCLUSIONS
PM/MF and SSG/PM efficacies were similar, and adverse drug reactions were as expected given the drugs safety profiles. With 1 less injection each day, reduced treatment duration, and no risk of SSG-associated life-threatening cardiotoxicity, PM/MF is a more patient-friendly alternative for children and adults with primary visceral leishmaniasis in eastern Africa.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION
NCT03129646.
This study aimed to determine whether paromomycin plus miltefosine (PM/MF) is noninferior to sodium stibogluconate plus paromomycin (SSG/PM) for treatment of primary visceral leishmaniasis in eastern Africa.
METHODS
An open-label, phase 3, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in adult and pediatric patients at 7 sites in eastern Africa. Patients were randomly assigned to either 20 mg/kg paromomycin plus allometric dose of miltefosine (14 days), or 20 mg/kg sodium stibogluconate plus 15 mg/kg paromomycin (17 days). The primary endpoint was definitive cure after 6 months.
RESULTS
Of 439 randomized patients, 424 completed the trial. Definitive cure at 6 months was 91.2% (155 of 170) and 91.8% (156 of 170) in the PM/MF and SSG/PM arms in primary efficacy modified intention-to-treat analysis (difference, 0.6%; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], -6.2 to 7.4), narrowly missing the noninferiority margin of 7%. In the per-protocol analysis, efficacy was 92% (149 of 162) and 91.7% (155 of 169) in the PM/MF and SSG/PM arms (difference, -0.3%; 97.5% CI, –7.0 to 6.5), demonstrating noninferiority. Treatments were well tolerated. Four of 18 serious adverse events were study drug–related, and 1 death was SSG-related. Allometric dosing ensured similar MF exposure in children (< 12 years) and adults.
CONCLUSIONS
PM/MF and SSG/PM efficacies were similar, and adverse drug reactions were as expected given the drugs safety profiles. With 1 less injection each day, reduced treatment duration, and no risk of SSG-associated life-threatening cardiotoxicity, PM/MF is a more patient-friendly alternative for children and adults with primary visceral leishmaniasis in eastern Africa.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION
NCT03129646.
Journal Article > CommentaryFull Text
J Infect Dis. 2024 December 16; Volume 230 (Issue 6); e1375-1384.; DOI:10.1093/infdis/jiae413
Chu WY, Verrest L, Younis BM, Musa AM, Mbui J, et al.
J Infect Dis. 2024 December 16; Volume 230 (Issue 6); e1375-1384.; DOI:10.1093/infdis/jiae413
Treatment regimens for post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) are usually extrapolated from those for visceral leishmaniasis (VL), but drug pharmacokinetics (PK) can differ due to disease-specific variations in absorption, distribution, and elimination. This study characterized PK differences in paromomycin and miltefosine between 109 PKDL and 264 VL patients from eastern Africa. VL patients showed 0.55-fold (95%CI: 0.41-0.74) lower capacity for paromomycin saturable reabsorption in renal tubules, and required a 1.44-fold (1.23-1.71) adjustment when relating renal clearance to creatinine-based eGFR. Miltefosine bioavailability in VL patients was lowered by 69% (62-76) at treatment start. Comparing PKDL to VL patients on the same regimen, paromomycin plasma exposures were 0.74-0.87-fold, while miltefosine exposure until the end of treatment day was 1.4-fold. These pronounced PK differences between PKDL and VL patients in eastern Africa highlight the challenges of directly extrapolating dosing regimens from one leishmaniasis presentation to another.
Conference Material > Slide Presentation
Fahal AH, Ahmed ES, Bakhiet SM, Bakheet OE, Fahal LA, et al.
MSF Scientific Day International 2024. 2024 May 16; DOI:10.57740/YDzkQTI