Journal Article > CommentaryFull Text
Trop Med Int Health. 10 August 2011; Volume 16 (Issue 11); DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02863.x
Tayler-Smith K, Zachariah R, Manzi M, Kizito W, Vandenbulcke A, et al.
Trop Med Int Health. 10 August 2011; Volume 16 (Issue 11); DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02863.x
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
PLOS One. 12 March 2012; Volume 7 (Issue 3); DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0032140
Nackers F, Huerga H, Espie E, Aloo AO, Bastard M, et al.
PLOS One. 12 March 2012; Volume 7 (Issue 3); DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0032140
Good adherence to treatment is crucial to control tuberculosis (TB). Efficiency and feasibility of directly observed therapy (DOT) under routine program conditions have been questioned. As an alternative, Médecins sans Frontières introduced self-administered therapy (SAT) in several TB programs. We aimed to measure adherence to TB treatment among patients receiving TB chemotherapy with fixed dose combination (FDC) under SAT at the Homa Bay district hospital (Kenya). A second objective was to compare the adherence agreement between different assessment tools.
Journal Article > EditorialFull Text
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 11 April 2022; Volume 19 (Issue 8); 4582.; DOI:10.3390/ijerph19084582
Zachariah R, Stewart AG, Chakaya JM, Teck R, Khogali MA, et al.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 11 April 2022; Volume 19 (Issue 8); 4582.; DOI:10.3390/ijerph19084582
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 14 May 2014; Volume 18 (Issue 5); 541-546.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.13.0630
Yakhelef N, Audibert M, Varaine FFV, Chakaya JM, Sitienei J, et al.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 14 May 2014; Volume 18 (Issue 5); 541-546.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.13.0630
SETTING
In 2007, the World Health Organization recommended introducing rapid Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture into the diagnostic algorithm of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis (TB).
OBJECTIVE
To assess the cost-effectiveness of introducing a rapid non-commercial culture method (thin-layer agar), together with Löwenstein-Jensen culture to diagnose smear-negative TB at a district hospital in Kenya.
DESIGN
Outcomes (number of true TB cases treated) were obtained from a prospective study evaluating the effectiveness of a clinical and radiological algorithm (conventional) against the alternative algorithm (conventional plus M. tuberculosis culture) in 380 smear-negative TB suspects. The costs of implementing each algorithm were calculated using a ‘micro-costing' or ‘ingredient-based' method. We then compared the cost and effectiveness of conventional vs. culture-based algorithms and estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
RESULTS
The costs of conventional and culture-based algorithms per smear-negative TB suspect were respectively €39.5 and €144. The costs per confirmed and treated TB case were respectively €452 and €913. The culture-based algorithm led to diagnosis and treatment of 27 more cases for an additional cost of €1477 per case.
CONCLUSION
Despite the increase in patients started on treatment thanks to culture, the relatively high cost of a culture-based algorithm will make it difficult for resource-limited countries to afford.
In 2007, the World Health Organization recommended introducing rapid Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture into the diagnostic algorithm of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis (TB).
OBJECTIVE
To assess the cost-effectiveness of introducing a rapid non-commercial culture method (thin-layer agar), together with Löwenstein-Jensen culture to diagnose smear-negative TB at a district hospital in Kenya.
DESIGN
Outcomes (number of true TB cases treated) were obtained from a prospective study evaluating the effectiveness of a clinical and radiological algorithm (conventional) against the alternative algorithm (conventional plus M. tuberculosis culture) in 380 smear-negative TB suspects. The costs of implementing each algorithm were calculated using a ‘micro-costing' or ‘ingredient-based' method. We then compared the cost and effectiveness of conventional vs. culture-based algorithms and estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
RESULTS
The costs of conventional and culture-based algorithms per smear-negative TB suspect were respectively €39.5 and €144. The costs per confirmed and treated TB case were respectively €452 and €913. The culture-based algorithm led to diagnosis and treatment of 27 more cases for an additional cost of €1477 per case.
CONCLUSION
Despite the increase in patients started on treatment thanks to culture, the relatively high cost of a culture-based algorithm will make it difficult for resource-limited countries to afford.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
PLOS One. 5 January 2018; Volume 13 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0190113
Subramanian S, Gakunga R, Kibachio J, Gathecha G, Edwards P, et al.
PLOS One. 5 January 2018; Volume 13 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0190113
The prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is rising in low- and middle-income countries, including Kenya, disproportionately to the rest of the world. Our objective was to quantify patient payments to obtain NCD screening, diagnosis, and treatment services in the public and private sector in Kenya and evaluate patients' ability to pay for the services.
Journal Article > ReviewAbstract
J Infect Dis. 3 April 2012; Volume 205 (Issue suppl_2); DOI:10.1093/infdis/jir858
Zumla A, Abubakar I, Raviglione M, Hoelscher M, Ditui L, et al.
J Infect Dis. 3 April 2012; Volume 205 (Issue suppl_2); DOI:10.1093/infdis/jir858
Tuberculosis was declared a global emergency by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1993. Following the declaration and the promotion in 1995 of directly observed treatment short course (DOTS), a cost-effective strategy to contain the tuberculosis epidemic, nearly 7 million lives have been saved compared with the pre-DOTS era, high cure rates have been achieved in most countries worldwide, and the global incidence of tuberculosis has been in a slow decline since the early 2000s. However, the emergence and spread of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis, extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis, and more recently, totally drug-resistant tuberculosis pose a threat to global tuberculosis control. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis is a man-made problem. Laboratory facilities for drug susceptibility testing are inadequate in most tuberculosis-endemic countries, especially in Africa; thus diagnosis is missed, routine surveillance is not implemented, and the actual numbers of global drug-resistant tuberculosis cases have yet to be estimated. This exposes an ominous situation and reveals an urgent need for commitment by national programs to health system improvement because the response to MDR tuberculosis requires strong health services in general. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and XDR tuberculosis greatly complicate patient management within resource-poor national tuberculosis programs, reducing treatment efficacy and increasing the cost of treatment to the extent that it could bankrupt healthcare financing in tuberculosis-endemic areas. Why, despite nearly 20 years of WHO-promoted activity and >12 years of MDR tuberculosis-specific activity, has the country response to the drug-resistant tuberculosis epidemic been so ineffectual? The current dilemmas, unanswered questions, operational issues, challenges, and priority needs for global drug resistance screening and surveillance, improved treatment regimens, and management of outcomes and prevention of DR tuberculosis are discussed.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Int J Infect Dis. 1 February 2020; Volume 92; DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.042
Migliori GB, Tiberi S, Zumla A, Petersen E, Chakaya JM, et al.
Int J Infect Dis. 1 February 2020; Volume 92; DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.042
The continuous flow of new research articles on MDR-TB diagnosis, treatment, prevention and rehabilitation requires frequent update of existing guidelines. This review is aimed at providing clinicians and public health staff with an updated and easy-to-consult document arising from consensus of Global Tuberculosis Network (GTN) experts. The core published documents and guidelines have been reviewed including the recently published MDR-TB WHO rapid advice and ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA guidelines. After a rapid review of epidemiology and risk factors, the clinical priorities on MDR-TB diagnosis (including whole genome sequencing and drug-susceptibility testing interpretations) and treatment (treatment design and management, TB in children) are discussed. Furthermore, the review comprehensively describes the latest information on contact tracing and LTBI management in MDR-TB contacts, while providing guidance on post-treatment functional evaluation and rehabilitation of TB sequelae, infection control and other public health priorities.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1 November 2011; Volume 15 (Issue 11); DOI:10.5588/ijtld.11.0316
Zachariah R, Reid AJ, Srinath S, Chakaya JM, Legins K, et al.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1 November 2011; Volume 15 (Issue 11); DOI:10.5588/ijtld.11.0316
Very limited operational research (OR) emerges from programme settings in low-income countries where the greatest burden of disease lies. The price paid for this void includes a lack of understanding of how health systems are actually functioning, not knowing what works and what does not, and an inability to propose adapted and innovative solutions to programme problems. We use the National Tuberculosis Control Programme as an example to advocate for strong programme-level leadership to steer OR and build viable relationships between programme managers, researchers and policy makers. We highlight the need to create a stimulating environment for conducting OR and identify some of the main practical challenges and enabling factors at programme level. We focus on the important role of an OR focal point within programmes and practical approaches to training that can deliver timely and quantifiable outputs. Finally, we emphasise the need to measure successful OR leadership development at programme level and we propose parameters by which this can be assessed. This paper 1) provides reasons why programmes should take the lead in coordinating and directing OR, 2) identifies the practical challenges and enabling factors for implementing, managing and sustaining OR and 3) proposes parameters for measuring successful leadership capacity development in OR.
Journal Article > ReviewAbstract
J Infect Dis. 10 April 2012; Volume 205 (Issue suppl_2); DOI:10.1093/infdis/jir860
McNerney R, Maeurer M, Abubakar I, Marais BJ, McHugh TD, et al.
J Infect Dis. 10 April 2012; Volume 205 (Issue suppl_2); DOI:10.1093/infdis/jir860
Tuberculosis is unique among the major infectious diseases in that it lacks accurate rapid point-of-care diagnostic tests. Failure to control the spread of tuberculosis is largely due to our inability to detect and treat all infectious cases of pulmonary tuberculosis in a timely fashion, allowing continued Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission within communities. Currently recommended gold-standard diagnostic tests for tuberculosis are laboratory based, and multiple investigations may be necessary over a period of weeks or months before a diagnosis is made. Several new diagnostic tests have recently become available for detecting active tuberculosis disease, screening for latent M. tuberculosis infection, and identifying drug-resistant strains of M. tuberculosis. However, progress toward a robust point-of-care test has been limited, and novel biomarker discovery remains challenging. In the absence of effective prevention strategies, high rates of early case detection and subsequent cure are required for global tuberculosis control. Early case detection is dependent on test accuracy, accessibility, cost, and complexity, but also depends on the political will and funder investment to deliver optimal, sustainable care to those worst affected by the tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus epidemics. This review highlights unanswered questions, challenges, recent advances, unresolved operational and technical issues, needs, and opportunities related to tuberculosis diagnostics.
Journal Article > CommentaryFull Text
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1 October 2021; Volume 25 (Issue 10); 797-813.; DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.21.0425
Migliori GB, Marx FM, Ambrosino N, Zampogna E, Schaaf HS, et al.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1 October 2021; Volume 25 (Issue 10); 797-813.; DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.21.0425
BACKGROUND
Increasing evidence suggests that post-TB lung disease (PTLD) causes significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of these clinical standards is to provide guidance on the assessment and management of PTLD and the implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR).
METHODS
A panel of global experts in the field of TB care and PR was identified; 62 participated in a Delphi process. A 5-point Likert scale was used to score the initial ideas for standards and after several rounds of revision the document was approved (with 100% agreement).
RESULTS
Five clinical standards were defined: Standard 1, to assess patients at the end of TB treatment for PTLD (with adaptation for children and specific settings/situations); Standard 2, to identify patients with PTLD for PR; Standard 3, tailoring the PR programme to patient needs and the local setting; Standard 4, to evaluate the effectiveness of PR; and Standard 5, to conduct education and counselling. Standard 6 addresses public health aspects of PTLD and outcomes due to PR.
CONCLUSION
This is the first consensus-based set of Clinical Standards for PTLD. Our aim is to improve patient care and quality of life by guiding clinicians, programme managers and public health officers in planning and implementing adequate measures to assess and manage PTLD.
Increasing evidence suggests that post-TB lung disease (PTLD) causes significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of these clinical standards is to provide guidance on the assessment and management of PTLD and the implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR).
METHODS
A panel of global experts in the field of TB care and PR was identified; 62 participated in a Delphi process. A 5-point Likert scale was used to score the initial ideas for standards and after several rounds of revision the document was approved (with 100% agreement).
RESULTS
Five clinical standards were defined: Standard 1, to assess patients at the end of TB treatment for PTLD (with adaptation for children and specific settings/situations); Standard 2, to identify patients with PTLD for PR; Standard 3, tailoring the PR programme to patient needs and the local setting; Standard 4, to evaluate the effectiveness of PR; and Standard 5, to conduct education and counselling. Standard 6 addresses public health aspects of PTLD and outcomes due to PR.
CONCLUSION
This is the first consensus-based set of Clinical Standards for PTLD. Our aim is to improve patient care and quality of life by guiding clinicians, programme managers and public health officers in planning and implementing adequate measures to assess and manage PTLD.