Journal Article > Meta-AnalysisFull Text
PLOS Med. 2012 August 28; Volume 9 (Issue 8); DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001300
Ahuja SD, Ashkin D, Avendano M, Banerjee R, Bayona J, et al.
PLOS Med. 2012 August 28; Volume 9 (Issue 8); DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001300
Treatment of multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is lengthy, toxic, expensive, and has generally poor outcomes. We undertook an individual patient data meta-analysis to assess the impact on outcomes of the type, number, and duration of drugs used to treat MDR-TB.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Eur Respir J. 2016 September 1; Volume 48 (Issue 4); DOI:10.1183/13993003.00462-2016
Mitnick CD, White RA, Lu C, Rodriguez CA, Bayona J, et al.
Eur Respir J. 2016 September 1; Volume 48 (Issue 4); DOI:10.1183/13993003.00462-2016
Debate persists about monitoring method (culture or smear) and interval (monthly or less frequently) during treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). We analysed existing data and estimated the effect of monitoring strategies on timing of failure detection.We identified studies reporting microbiological response to MDR-TB treatment and solicited individual patient data from authors. Frailty survival models were used to estimate pooled relative risk of failure detection in the last 12 months of treatment; hazard of failure using monthly culture was the reference.Data were obtained for 5410 patients across 12 observational studies. During the last 12 months of treatment, failure detection occurred in a median of 3 months by monthly culture; failure detection was delayed by 2, 7, and 9 months relying on bimonthly culture, monthly smear and bimonthly smear, respectively. Risk (95% CI) of failure detection delay resulting from monthly smear relative to culture is 0.38 (0.34-0.42) for all patients and 0.33 (0.25-0.42) for HIV-co-infected patients.Failure detection is delayed by reducing the sensitivity and frequency of the monitoring method. Monthly monitoring of sputum cultures from patients receiving MDR-TB treatment is recommended. Expanded laboratory capacity is needed for high-quality culture, and for smear microscopy and rapid molecular tests.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016 June 1; Volume 20 (Issue 6); 832-838.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.15.0577
Jindani A, Borgulya G, de Patino IW, Gonzales T, de Fernandes RA, et al.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016 June 1; Volume 20 (Issue 6); 832-838.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.15.0577
SETTING
Randomised Phase IIB clinical trial.
OBJECTIVES
To assess whether increasing the dose of rifampicin (RMP) from 10 mg/kg to 15 or 20 mg/kg results in an increase in grade 3 or 4 hepatic adverse events and/or serious adverse events (SAE).
METHODS
Three hundred human immunodeficiency virus negative patients with newly diagnosed microscopy-positive pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) were randomly assigned to one of three regimens: 1) the control regimen (R10), comprising daily ethambutol (EMB), isoniazid (INH), RMP and pyrazinamide for 8 weeks, followed by INH and RMP daily for 18 weeks; 2) Study Regimen 1 (R15), as above, with the RMP dose increased to 15 mg/kg body weight daily for the first 16 weeks; and 3) Study Regimen 2 (R20), as above, with RMP increased to 20 mg/kg. Serum alanine transferase (ALT) levels were measured at regular intervals.
RESULTS
There were seven grade 3 increases in ALT levels, 1/100 (1%) among R10 arm patients, 2/100 (2%) in the R15 arm and 4/100 (4%) in the R20 arm (trend test P = 0.15). One (R15) patient developed jaundice, requiring treatment modification. There were no grade 4 ALT increases. There was a non-significant increase in culture negativity at 8 weeks with increasing RMP dosage: 75% (69/92) in R10, 82.5% (66/80) in R15 and 83.1% (76/91) R20 patients (P = 0.16).
CONCLUSIONS
No significant increase in adverse events occurred when the RMP dose was increased from 10 mg/kg to 15 mg/kg or 20 mg/kg.
Randomised Phase IIB clinical trial.
OBJECTIVES
To assess whether increasing the dose of rifampicin (RMP) from 10 mg/kg to 15 or 20 mg/kg results in an increase in grade 3 or 4 hepatic adverse events and/or serious adverse events (SAE).
METHODS
Three hundred human immunodeficiency virus negative patients with newly diagnosed microscopy-positive pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) were randomly assigned to one of three regimens: 1) the control regimen (R10), comprising daily ethambutol (EMB), isoniazid (INH), RMP and pyrazinamide for 8 weeks, followed by INH and RMP daily for 18 weeks; 2) Study Regimen 1 (R15), as above, with the RMP dose increased to 15 mg/kg body weight daily for the first 16 weeks; and 3) Study Regimen 2 (R20), as above, with RMP increased to 20 mg/kg. Serum alanine transferase (ALT) levels were measured at regular intervals.
RESULTS
There were seven grade 3 increases in ALT levels, 1/100 (1%) among R10 arm patients, 2/100 (2%) in the R15 arm and 4/100 (4%) in the R20 arm (trend test P = 0.15). One (R15) patient developed jaundice, requiring treatment modification. There were no grade 4 ALT increases. There was a non-significant increase in culture negativity at 8 weeks with increasing RMP dosage: 75% (69/92) in R10, 82.5% (66/80) in R15 and 83.1% (76/91) R20 patients (P = 0.16).
CONCLUSIONS
No significant increase in adverse events occurred when the RMP dose was increased from 10 mg/kg to 15 mg/kg or 20 mg/kg.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
NEJM Evid. 2023 September 1; Volume 2 (Issue 9); 1-12.; DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2300054
Jindani A, Atwine D, Grint D, Bah B, Adams J, et al.
NEJM Evid. 2023 September 1; Volume 2 (Issue 9); 1-12.; DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2300054
BACKGROUND
Shorter but effective tuberculosis treatment regimens would be of value to the tuberculosis treatment community. High-dose rifampicin has been associated with more rapid and secure lung sterilization and may enable shorter tuberculosis treatment regimens.
METHODS
We randomly assigned adults who were given a diagnosis of rifampicin-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis to a 6-month control regimen, a similar 4-month regimen of rifampicin at 1200?mg/d (study regimen 1 [SR1]), or a 4-month regimen of rifampicin at 1800?mg/d (study regimen 2 [SR2]). Sputum specimens were collected at regular intervals. The primary end point was a composite of treatment failure and relapse in participants who were sputum smear positive at baseline. The noninferiority margin was 8 percentage points. Using a sequence of ordered hypotheses, noninferiority of SR2 was tested first.
RESULTS
Between January 2017 and December 2020, 672 patients were enrolled in six countries, including 191 in the control group, 192 in the SR1 group, and 195 in the SR2 group. Noninferiority was not shown. Favorable responses rates were 93, 90, and 87% in the control, SR1, and SR2 groups, respectively, for a country-adjusted absolute risk difference of 6.3 percentage points (90% confidence interval, 1.1 to 11.5) comparing SR2 with the control group. The proportions of participants experiencing a grade 3 or 4 adverse event were 4.0, 4.5, and 4.4% in the control, SR1, and SR2 groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Four-month high-dose rifampicin regimens did not have dose-limiting toxicities or side effects but failed to meet noninferiority criteria compared with the standard 6-month control regimen for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis.
Shorter but effective tuberculosis treatment regimens would be of value to the tuberculosis treatment community. High-dose rifampicin has been associated with more rapid and secure lung sterilization and may enable shorter tuberculosis treatment regimens.
METHODS
We randomly assigned adults who were given a diagnosis of rifampicin-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis to a 6-month control regimen, a similar 4-month regimen of rifampicin at 1200?mg/d (study regimen 1 [SR1]), or a 4-month regimen of rifampicin at 1800?mg/d (study regimen 2 [SR2]). Sputum specimens were collected at regular intervals. The primary end point was a composite of treatment failure and relapse in participants who were sputum smear positive at baseline. The noninferiority margin was 8 percentage points. Using a sequence of ordered hypotheses, noninferiority of SR2 was tested first.
RESULTS
Between January 2017 and December 2020, 672 patients were enrolled in six countries, including 191 in the control group, 192 in the SR1 group, and 195 in the SR2 group. Noninferiority was not shown. Favorable responses rates were 93, 90, and 87% in the control, SR1, and SR2 groups, respectively, for a country-adjusted absolute risk difference of 6.3 percentage points (90% confidence interval, 1.1 to 11.5) comparing SR2 with the control group. The proportions of participants experiencing a grade 3 or 4 adverse event were 4.0, 4.5, and 4.4% in the control, SR1, and SR2 groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Four-month high-dose rifampicin regimens did not have dose-limiting toxicities or side effects but failed to meet noninferiority criteria compared with the standard 6-month control regimen for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis.