Journal Article > EditorialFull Text
BMJ Opinion (blog). 2023 September 25; Volume 382; 2205.; DOI:10.1136/bmj.p2205
Bhardwaj V, Philips M
BMJ Opinion (blog). 2023 September 25; Volume 382; 2205.; DOI:10.1136/bmj.p2205
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
BMJ Open. 2020 July 8; Volume 10 (Issue 7); e037545.; DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037545.
Keene CM, Zokufa N, Venables E, Wilkinson LS, Hoffman R, et al.
BMJ Open. 2020 July 8; Volume 10 (Issue 7); e037545.; DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037545.
OBJECTIVE
Longer intervals between routine clinic visits and medication refills are part of patient-centred, differentiated service delivery (DSD). They have been shown to improve patient outcomes as well as optimise health services—vital as ‘universal test-and-treat’ targets increase numbers of HIV patients on antiretroviral treatment (ART). This qualitative study explored patient, healthcare worker and key informant experiences and perceptions of extending ART refills to 6 months in adherence clubs in Khayelitsha, South Africa.
DESIGN AND SETTING
In-depth interviews were conducted in isiXhosa with purposively selected patients and in English with healthcare workers and key informants. All transcripts were audio-recorded, transcribed and translated to English, manually coded and thematically analysed. The participants had been involved in a randomised controlled trial evaluating multi-month ART dispensing in adherence clubs, comparing 6-month and 2-month refills.
PARTICIPANTS
Twenty-three patients, seven healthcare workers and six key informants.
RESULTS
Patients found that 6-month refills increased convenience and reduced unintended disclosure. Contrary to key informant concerns about patients’ responsibility to manage larger quantities of ART, patients receiving 6-month refills were highly motivated and did not face challenges transporting, storing or adhering to treatment. All participant groups suggested that strict eligibility criteria were necessary for patients to realise the benefits of extended dispensing intervals. Six-month refills were felt to increase health system efficiency, but there were concerns about whether the existing drug supply system could adapt to 6-month refills on a larger scale.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients, healthcare workers and key informants found 6-month refills within adherence clubs acceptable and beneficial, but concerns were raised about the reliability of the supply chain to manage extended multi-month dispensing. Stepwise, slow expansion could avoid overstressing supply and allow time for the health system to adapt, permitting 6-month ART refills to enhance current DSD options to be more efficient and patient-centred within current health system constraints.
Longer intervals between routine clinic visits and medication refills are part of patient-centred, differentiated service delivery (DSD). They have been shown to improve patient outcomes as well as optimise health services—vital as ‘universal test-and-treat’ targets increase numbers of HIV patients on antiretroviral treatment (ART). This qualitative study explored patient, healthcare worker and key informant experiences and perceptions of extending ART refills to 6 months in adherence clubs in Khayelitsha, South Africa.
DESIGN AND SETTING
In-depth interviews were conducted in isiXhosa with purposively selected patients and in English with healthcare workers and key informants. All transcripts were audio-recorded, transcribed and translated to English, manually coded and thematically analysed. The participants had been involved in a randomised controlled trial evaluating multi-month ART dispensing in adherence clubs, comparing 6-month and 2-month refills.
PARTICIPANTS
Twenty-three patients, seven healthcare workers and six key informants.
RESULTS
Patients found that 6-month refills increased convenience and reduced unintended disclosure. Contrary to key informant concerns about patients’ responsibility to manage larger quantities of ART, patients receiving 6-month refills were highly motivated and did not face challenges transporting, storing or adhering to treatment. All participant groups suggested that strict eligibility criteria were necessary for patients to realise the benefits of extended dispensing intervals. Six-month refills were felt to increase health system efficiency, but there were concerns about whether the existing drug supply system could adapt to 6-month refills on a larger scale.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients, healthcare workers and key informants found 6-month refills within adherence clubs acceptable and beneficial, but concerns were raised about the reliability of the supply chain to manage extended multi-month dispensing. Stepwise, slow expansion could avoid overstressing supply and allow time for the health system to adapt, permitting 6-month ART refills to enhance current DSD options to be more efficient and patient-centred within current health system constraints.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
PLOS One. 2023 November 3; Volume 18 (Issue 11); e0286906.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0286906
Nelson AM, Lebelo K, Cassidy T, Duran LT, Mantangana N, et al.
PLOS One. 2023 November 3; Volume 18 (Issue 11); e0286906.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0286906
BACKGROUND
Despite the overall reduction in the HIV mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) rate in South Africa, poor adherence and retention in care during breastfeeding contribute to this period being a major driver of MTCT in South Africa. To improve this retention, postnatal clubs were created as an integrated, differentiated model of care providing psychosocial support and comprehensive care for the mother-infant pairs (MIP), including HIV and under-5-child services. We describe the implementation of these facility-based clubs and examine its health outcomes in a peri-urban primary health care setting in Cape Town, South Africa.
METHODS
In this prospective cohort study, conducted between June 2016 and December 2019, MIPs were recruited into postnatal clubs between 6 weeks and 6 months of age and followed-up until 18 months of age. Outcomes including maternal Viral Load (VL), and children’s HIV testing were compared to a historical control group. Children’s immunizations and maternal sexual and reproductive health outcomes are also described.
RESULTS
During the implementation of the postnatal club study period, 484 MIP were recruited with 84% overall attendance, 95% overall viral load suppression, and 98% overall uptake of HIV infant testing. Compared to historical controls, the club infant rapid test uptake was 1.6 times higher (95% CI: 1.4–1.9) at 9 months and 2.0 times higher at 18 months (95% CI: 1.6–2.6). Through 12 months and between 12–18 months, maternal VL monitoring was higher in the club group compared to the historical control by 1.5 times (95% CI: 1.3–1.6) and 2.6 times (95% CI: 2.1–3.2), respectively, with similar maternal VL suppression. Of 105 infants attending the 12 months visit, 99% were fully vaccinated by one year.
CONCLUSION
MIP in the postnatal clubs showed better PMTCT outcomes than historical controls with high levels of retention in care. Other outcomes such as immunisation results suggest that integration of services, such as in the postnatal club, is feasible and beneficial for MIPs.
Despite the overall reduction in the HIV mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) rate in South Africa, poor adherence and retention in care during breastfeeding contribute to this period being a major driver of MTCT in South Africa. To improve this retention, postnatal clubs were created as an integrated, differentiated model of care providing psychosocial support and comprehensive care for the mother-infant pairs (MIP), including HIV and under-5-child services. We describe the implementation of these facility-based clubs and examine its health outcomes in a peri-urban primary health care setting in Cape Town, South Africa.
METHODS
In this prospective cohort study, conducted between June 2016 and December 2019, MIPs were recruited into postnatal clubs between 6 weeks and 6 months of age and followed-up until 18 months of age. Outcomes including maternal Viral Load (VL), and children’s HIV testing were compared to a historical control group. Children’s immunizations and maternal sexual and reproductive health outcomes are also described.
RESULTS
During the implementation of the postnatal club study period, 484 MIP were recruited with 84% overall attendance, 95% overall viral load suppression, and 98% overall uptake of HIV infant testing. Compared to historical controls, the club infant rapid test uptake was 1.6 times higher (95% CI: 1.4–1.9) at 9 months and 2.0 times higher at 18 months (95% CI: 1.6–2.6). Through 12 months and between 12–18 months, maternal VL monitoring was higher in the club group compared to the historical control by 1.5 times (95% CI: 1.3–1.6) and 2.6 times (95% CI: 2.1–3.2), respectively, with similar maternal VL suppression. Of 105 infants attending the 12 months visit, 99% were fully vaccinated by one year.
CONCLUSION
MIP in the postnatal clubs showed better PMTCT outcomes than historical controls with high levels of retention in care. Other outcomes such as immunisation results suggest that integration of services, such as in the postnatal club, is feasible and beneficial for MIPs.
Technical Report > Evidence Brief
Philips M, Bhardwaj V
2023 September 14
English
Français
Through providing free medical care to people in conflict settings, natural disasters, pandemics, and among people excluded from the health system, MSF teams see first-hand the challenges in accessing healthcare around the world. Our report draws on this practical experience, identifying specific barriers to accessing healthcare for the most vulnerable. We recognize the UNHLM on Universal Health Coverage (UHC) as a key flashpoint on commitments, but we are concerned that the current UHC agenda and most UHC country plans fall short of the ‘Leave no one behind’ principle.
MSF has previously raised concerns about the way UHC targets are developed, with a lack of attention to important barriers to accessing care. In this report we have collected illustrations of problems in getting access to care for the most vulnerable and people in the most critical health situations, such as those in emergencies and crises; migrants and refugees; and people forced to forego essential care because of financial barriers. Through these examples, augmented by the academic and grey literature on financing for UHC, we highlight the real-life and acute gaps between the declared aspirations of UHC and the lived experiences of millions of people. Without action on critical challenges for those without timely and affordable health care, the UHC agenda and country plans will miss their goal and diminish UHC’s credibility.
MSF has previously raised concerns about the way UHC targets are developed, with a lack of attention to important barriers to accessing care. In this report we have collected illustrations of problems in getting access to care for the most vulnerable and people in the most critical health situations, such as those in emergencies and crises; migrants and refugees; and people forced to forego essential care because of financial barriers. Through these examples, augmented by the academic and grey literature on financing for UHC, we highlight the real-life and acute gaps between the declared aspirations of UHC and the lived experiences of millions of people. Without action on critical challenges for those without timely and affordable health care, the UHC agenda and country plans will miss their goal and diminish UHC’s credibility.