Severely malnourished patients can present with bilateral pitting oedema, which is a common sign of Kwashiorkor. However, bilateral pitting oedema can also be an expression of other pathologies. In Mali and DRC, the number of children presenting with bilateral pitting oedema at MSF (Médecins Sans Frontiers/Doctors Without Borders) hospitals are up to 30% (Mali) and 49% (DRC) higher than in other countries, however, the reasons underlying this trend are unknown. Through this qualitative study, we aimed to explore the perspectives and lived experiences of health professionals on the diagnosis and management of children with bilateral pitting oedema. Using a participatory approach, we conducted 21 in-depth interviews, and 2 focus groups with health professionals at MSF health facilities who had worked in the settings of Koutiala (Mali) and Rutshuru (DRC) for at least 6 months. The understanding of the bilateral pitting oedema phenomenon is complex. Health workers described clinical obstacles to reducing mortality, including: i) difficulties making the diagnosis due to a lack of specialized staff and insufficient resources, ii) challenges treating complications that may arise due to the complexity of the diseases associated with bilateral pitting oedema, and iii) lack of scientific evidence in the literature explaining the physiopathology of bilateral pitting oedema. Study participants shared several key recommendations for reducing mortality among children presenting with bilateral pitting oedema, including prevention of bilateral pitting oedema at the community level, standardization of the diagnostic process, strengthening of medical training, and better collaboration both within the medical teams and between teams and the children’s families.
BACKGROUND
Mobility of people living with HIV (PWH) among urban population in Goma and the fisherfolk community in western Uganda can serve as a barrier to retention in care. To address this challenge, MSF supported MoH in deployment of WHO recommended Differentiated Services Delivery Models (DSDM), especially Community ART groups (CAG) where clients form groups and rotate drug pick-up. In these studies, we aimed to explore retention-in-care, viral load coverage and suppression among PWH enrolled in DSDM and describe acceptability and satisfaction of these models in Goma, DRC and Kasese, Uganda.
METHODS
In both contexts, we carried out a retrospective cohort analysis complemented by a cross-sectional survey in Goma and a qualitative survey in Kasese. For the cohort analysis, we examined the characteristics of PWH enrolled in DSDM. Utilizing Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, we estimated retention in care and calculated viral coverage and suppression rates at 12 months post-model initiation. In Goma, we administered a satisfaction questionnaire to a subset of the active cohort, while in Kasese, we conducted interviews and facilitated focus group discussions to document the acceptability and relevance of DSDM.
RESULTS
In total, 1950 PWH in Goma and 1773 PWH in Kasese were included in the cohort analyses. After one year of model initiation, more than 90% of PWH enrolled in MSF-supported DSDM were retained in care (94.1% among PWH in Goma and 97.6% in Kasese). Of PWH who retained in care at 1-year, proportion of virally suppressed PWH was high in both contexts (96.4% in Goma and 97.0% in Goma). PWH and healthcare providers expressed positive sentiments towards DSMD, acknowledging their utility in enhancing convenience and reducing transport expenses for ART access. Moreover, they noted benefits such as decreased waiting times, alleviation of overcrowding and workload at healthcare facilities, as well as the role of DSDM in mitigating stigma and fostering responsibility sharing among group members.
CONCLUSION
Although great progress has been made in the fight against the HIV epidemic in recent years, a one-size-fits-all approach to caring for people living with HIV is no longer appropriate. The findings from these evaluations underscore the effectiveness of tailored, differentiated services, which maintain high retention rates in care, even within mobile communities, while also garnering strong acceptability. It is imperative to consider integrating DSDM into routine programming for chronic illnesses. By adapting clinical care to suit the lifestyles of PWH, such models can offer enhanced support to patients, ultimately improving health outcomes.
The COVID-19 pandemic and the measures taken to limit its spread have severely disrupted health systems and medical care. People living with HIV (PLHIV) suffer from high levels of comorbidities and stigma, and often faced challenges in access to care prior to the pandemic. The aim of this study was to explore the extent to which the pandemic and the public health measures have affected medical care for PLHIV. The study took place in two different contexts in terms of care and experience of the pandemic where MSF operates, in Arua (Uganda) and Chiradzulu (Malawi).
METHODS
We conducted a multicentric mixed-methods study . The quantitative component explored patients’ retention in care and viral suppression using programmatic data routinely collected from January 2018 to April 2021 . The qualitative study investigated patient perspectives and perceptions of the impact of Covid-19 and the public health and social measures on their lives and ability to manage their health, and on HIV care. The interviews with patients were conducted from January to June 2021.
RESULTS
From 2020 to 2021, we observed a 15% decrease in active cohort among adults on any regimen and a 17% decrease among children and adolescents in Arua. During the same period in Chiradzulu, the first- and second-line cohorts decreased in size (10% drop and 12% drop, respectively). In addition, we observed a reduction in ART initiations and in clinical consultations at the start of pandemic (50% and 68% in Arua and 34% and 60% in Chiradzulu, respectively) and a gradual decrease in viral load coverage. In Uganda, the lockdown affected patients’ and caregivers’ livelihoods, education, access to food and psychosocial wellbeing negatively, which at times affected their ability to manage HIV condition at home and to adhere. Adolescents lost support, experienced increasing HIV stigma, and started to provide for themselves. In Malawi, patients and caregivers emphasized the impact of the pandemic and public health measures on livelihoods and food security and noted the reduction or absence of MSF social support activities during this time. Also, the fear of COVID at health facilities and the confusion and lack of communication about regarding day-to-day changes in activities was disturbing to both patients and staff.
CONCLUSION
The COVID-19 epidemic and public health measures had an important negative impact on HIV care in the health facilities and in the community in Arua and Chiradzulu. To ensure a conducive environment for patients’ access to essential HIV care and treatment during potential future outbreaks requires continued collaboration with the national authorities and advocacy for more non-violent and less authoritarian ways of implementing restrictions. In addition, innovative public health information campaigns about COVID-19 and care services, to reduce fear of disease and to dispel rumours and misinformation are recommended.
KEY MESSAGE
COVID-19 has severely disrupted access to health systems and treatment. The measures put in place to limit the spread of the epidemic have altered people's bearings. How has the pandemic in Arua and Chiradzulu affected PLHIV, who already suffer from higher levels of mental health problems, comorbidities and stigma?
This abstract is not to be quoted for publication.
HIV diagnosis and linkage to care are the main barriers in Africa to achieving the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets. We assessed HIV-positive status awareness and linkage to care among survey participants in Chiradzulu District, Malawi.
METHOD
Nested cohort study within a population-based survey of persons aged 15-59 years between February and May 2013. Participants were interviewed and tested for HIV (and CD4 if found HIV-positive) in their homes. Multivariable regression was used to determine factors associated with HIV-positive status awareness prior to the survey and subsequent linkage to care.
RESULTS
Of 8277 individuals eligible for the survey, 7270 (87.8%) participated and were tested for HIV. The overall HIV prevalence was 17.0%. Among HIV-positive participants, 77.0% knew their status and 72.8% were in care. Women (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6.5, 95% CI 3.2-13.1) and older participants (40-59 vs. 15-29 years, aOR 10.1, 95% CI 4.0-25.9) were more likely to be aware of their positive status. Of those newly diagnosed, 47.5% were linked to care within 3 months. Linkage to care was higher among older participants (40-59 vs. 15-29, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.39, 95% CI 1.83-6.26), women (aHR 1.73, 95% CI 1.12-2.67) and those eligible for ART (aHR 1.61, 95% CI 1.03-2.52).
CONCLUSIONS
In settings with high levels of HIV awareness, home-based testing remains an efficient strategy to diagnose and link to care. Men were less likely to be diagnosed, and when diagnosed to link to care, underscoring the need for a gender focus in order to achieve the 90-90-90 targets.