Journal Article > ReviewFull Text
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 February 1; Volume 4 (Issue 2); 135-184.; DOI:10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30270-X
Cooke GS, Andrieux-Meyer I, Applegate TL, Atun R, Burry J, et al.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 February 1; Volume 4 (Issue 2); 135-184.; DOI:10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30270-X
Viral hepatitis is a major public health threat and a leading cause of death worldwide. Annual mortality from viral hepatitis is similar to that of other major infectious diseases such as HIV and tuberculosis. Highly effective prevention measures and treatments have made the global elimination of viral hepatitis a realistic goal, endorsed by all WHO member states. Ambitious targets call for a global reduction in hepatitis-related mortality of 65% and a 90% reduction in new infections by 2030. This Commission draws together a wide range of expertise to appraise the current global situation and to identify priorities globally, regionally, and nationally needed to accelerate progress. We identify 20 heavily burdened countries that account for over 75% of the global burden of viral hepatitis. Key recommendations include a greater focus on national progress towards elimination with support given, if necessary, through innovative financing measures to ensure elimination programmes are fully funded by 2020. In addition to further measures to improve access to vaccination and treatment, greater attention needs to be paid to access to affordable, high-quality diagnostics if testing is to reach the levels needed to achieve elimination goals. Simplified, decentralised models of care removing requirements for specialised prescribing will be required to reach those in need, together with sustained efforts to tackle stigma and discrimination. We identify key examples of the progress that has already been made in many countries throughout the world, demonstrating that sustained and coordinated efforts can be successful in achieving the WHO elimination goals.
Journal Article > CommentaryFull Text
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 August 1; DOI:10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30197-4.
Kehlenbrink S, Jaacks LM, Perone SA, Ansbro É, Ashbourne E, et al.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 August 1; DOI:10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30197-4.
Journal Article > CommentaryFull Text
Lancet. 2011 July 16; Volume 378 (Issue 9787); 282-4.; DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62303-3
Schouten EJ, Jahn A, Midiani D, Makombe SD, Mnthambala A, et al.
Lancet. 2011 July 16; Volume 378 (Issue 9787); 282-4.; DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62303-3
Journal Article > ReviewAbstract
J Infect Dis. 2012 April 3; Volume 205 (Issue suppl_2); DOI:10.1093/infdis/jir858
Zumla A, Abubakar I, Raviglione M, Hoelscher M, Ditui L, et al.
J Infect Dis. 2012 April 3; Volume 205 (Issue suppl_2); DOI:10.1093/infdis/jir858
Tuberculosis was declared a global emergency by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1993. Following the declaration and the promotion in 1995 of directly observed treatment short course (DOTS), a cost-effective strategy to contain the tuberculosis epidemic, nearly 7 million lives have been saved compared with the pre-DOTS era, high cure rates have been achieved in most countries worldwide, and the global incidence of tuberculosis has been in a slow decline since the early 2000s. However, the emergence and spread of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis, extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis, and more recently, totally drug-resistant tuberculosis pose a threat to global tuberculosis control. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis is a man-made problem. Laboratory facilities for drug susceptibility testing are inadequate in most tuberculosis-endemic countries, especially in Africa; thus diagnosis is missed, routine surveillance is not implemented, and the actual numbers of global drug-resistant tuberculosis cases have yet to be estimated. This exposes an ominous situation and reveals an urgent need for commitment by national programs to health system improvement because the response to MDR tuberculosis requires strong health services in general. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and XDR tuberculosis greatly complicate patient management within resource-poor national tuberculosis programs, reducing treatment efficacy and increasing the cost of treatment to the extent that it could bankrupt healthcare financing in tuberculosis-endemic areas. Why, despite nearly 20 years of WHO-promoted activity and >12 years of MDR tuberculosis-specific activity, has the country response to the drug-resistant tuberculosis epidemic been so ineffectual? The current dilemmas, unanswered questions, operational issues, challenges, and priority needs for global drug resistance screening and surveillance, improved treatment regimens, and management of outcomes and prevention of DR tuberculosis are discussed.
Journal Article > ReviewAbstract
J Infect Dis. 2012 April 10; Volume 205 (Issue suppl_2); DOI:10.1093/infdis/jir860
McNerney R, Maeurer M, Abubakar I, Marais BJ, McHugh TD, et al.
J Infect Dis. 2012 April 10; Volume 205 (Issue suppl_2); DOI:10.1093/infdis/jir860
Tuberculosis is unique among the major infectious diseases in that it lacks accurate rapid point-of-care diagnostic tests. Failure to control the spread of tuberculosis is largely due to our inability to detect and treat all infectious cases of pulmonary tuberculosis in a timely fashion, allowing continued Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission within communities. Currently recommended gold-standard diagnostic tests for tuberculosis are laboratory based, and multiple investigations may be necessary over a period of weeks or months before a diagnosis is made. Several new diagnostic tests have recently become available for detecting active tuberculosis disease, screening for latent M. tuberculosis infection, and identifying drug-resistant strains of M. tuberculosis. However, progress toward a robust point-of-care test has been limited, and novel biomarker discovery remains challenging. In the absence of effective prevention strategies, high rates of early case detection and subsequent cure are required for global tuberculosis control. Early case detection is dependent on test accuracy, accessibility, cost, and complexity, but also depends on the political will and funder investment to deliver optimal, sustainable care to those worst affected by the tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus epidemics. This review highlights unanswered questions, challenges, recent advances, unresolved operational and technical issues, needs, and opportunities related to tuberculosis diagnostics.
Journal Article > CommentaryFull Text
Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 February 9; Volume 26 (Issue 5); DOI:10.1097/BOT.0b013e318225e8d0
Zachariah R, Ford NP, Maher D, Bissell K, Van der Bergh R, et al.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 February 9; Volume 26 (Issue 5); DOI:10.1097/BOT.0b013e318225e8d0
Operational research in low-income countries has a key role in filling the gap between what we know from research and what we do with that knowledge-the so-called know-do gap, or implementation gap. Planned research that does not tangibly affect policies and practices is ineffective and wasteful, especially in settings where resources are scarce and disease burden is high. Clear parameters are urgently needed to measure and judge the success of operational research. We define operational research and its relation with policy and practice, identify why operational research might fail to affect policy and practice, and offer possible solutions to address these shortcomings. We also propose measures of success for operational research. Adoption and use of these measures could help to ensure that operational research better changes policy and practice and improves health-care delivery and disease programmes.