logo
Science Portal
Copyright © Médecins Sans Frontières
v2.1.5115.produswest2
About MSF Science Portal
About
Contact Us
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Copyright © Médecins Sans Frontières
v2.1.5115.produswest2
Field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in Bihar, India | Journal Article / Research | MSF Science Portal
Journal Article
|Research

Field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in Bihar, India

Goyal V, Mahajan R, Pandey K, Singh SN, Singh RS, Strub-Wourgaft N, Alves F, Rabi Das VN, Topno RK, Sharma B, Balasegaram M, Bern C, Hightower A, Rijal S, Ellis SJ, Sunyoto T, Burza S, Lima NT, Das P, Alvar J
Download

Similar Content
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Abstract
BACKGROUND
In 2010, WHO recommended the use of new short-course treatment regimens in kala-azar elimination efforts for the Indian subcontinent. Although phase 3 studies have shown excellent results, there remains a lack of evidence on a wider treatment population and the safety and effectiveness of these regimens under field conditions.

METHODS
This was an open label, prospective, non-randomized, non-comparative, multi-centric trial conducted within public health facilities in two highly endemic districts and a specialist referral centre in Bihar, India. Three treatment regimens were tested: single dose AmBisome (SDA), concomitant miltefosine and paromomycin (Milt+PM), and concomitant AmBisome and miltefosine (AmB+Milt). Patients with complicated disease or significant co-morbidities were treated in the SDA arm. Sample sizes were set at a minimum of 300 per arm, taking into account inter-site variation and an estimated failure risk of 5% with 5% precision. Outcomes of drug effectiveness and safety were measured at 6 months. The trial was prospectively registered with the Clinical Trials Registry India: CTRI/2012/08/002891.

RESULTS
Out of 1,761 patients recruited, 50.6% (n = 891) received SDA, 20.3% (n = 358) AmB+Milt and 29.1% (n = 512) Milt+PM. In the ITT analysis, the final cure rates were SDA 91.4% (95% CI 89.3-93.1), AmB+Milt 88.8% (95% CI 85.1-91.9) and Milt+PM 96.9% (95% CI 95.0-98.2). In the complete case analysis, cure rates were SDA 95.5% (95% CI 93.9-96.8), AmB+Milt 95.5% (95% CI 92.7-97.5) and Milt+PM 99.6% (95% CI 98.6-99.9). All three regimens were safe, with 5 severe adverse events in the SDA arm, two of which were considered to be drug related.

CONCLUSION
All regimens showed acceptable outcomes and safety profiles in a range of patients under field conditions. Phase IV field-based studies, although extremely rare for neglected tropical diseases, are good practice and an important step in validating the results of more restrictive hospital-based studies before widespread implementation, and in this case contributed to national level policy change in India.

Countries

India

Subject Area

neglected tropical diseaseskala azar

Languages

English
DOI
10.1371/journal.pntd.0006830
Published Date
22 Oct 2018
PubMed ID
30346949
Journal
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Volume | Issue | Pages
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages e0006830
Issue Date
2018-10-22
Dimensions Badge