Journal Article
|ResearchPeanut-based ready-to-use therapeutic food: acceptability among malnourished children and community workers in Bangladesh
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To assess the acceptability of a ready-to-use therapeutic food (Plumpy'nut(®) [PPN]) among 1) care givers of malnourished children and 2) community health workers (CHWs) at a nutrition rehabilitation centre in an urban slum in Dhaka, Bangladesh.
METHODS
This was a cross-sectional semi-structured questionnaire survey conducted between April and June 2011 as part of a nutritional programme run by Médecins Sans Frontières. The study population included care givers of malnourished children aged 6-59 months who received PPN for at least 3 weeks, and CHWs.
RESULTS
Of the 149 care givers (93% female) interviewed, 60% expressed problems with PPN acceptability. Overall, 43% perceived the child's dissatisfaction with the taste, 31% with consistency and 64% attributed side effects to PPN (nausea, vomiting, loose motion, diarrhoea, abdominal distension and pain). It is to be noted that 47% of children needed encouragement or were forced to eat PPN, while 5% completely rejected it after 3 weeks. Of the 29 CHWs interviewed, 48% were dissatisfied with PPN's taste and consistency, and 55% with its smell. However, 91% of the care givers and all CHWs still perceived a therapeutic benefit of PPN for malnourished children.
CONCLUSION
Despite a therapeutic benefit, only 4 in 10 care givers perceived PPN as being acceptable as a food product, which is of concern.
To assess the acceptability of a ready-to-use therapeutic food (Plumpy'nut(®) [PPN]) among 1) care givers of malnourished children and 2) community health workers (CHWs) at a nutrition rehabilitation centre in an urban slum in Dhaka, Bangladesh.
METHODS
This was a cross-sectional semi-structured questionnaire survey conducted between April and June 2011 as part of a nutritional programme run by Médecins Sans Frontières. The study population included care givers of malnourished children aged 6-59 months who received PPN for at least 3 weeks, and CHWs.
RESULTS
Of the 149 care givers (93% female) interviewed, 60% expressed problems with PPN acceptability. Overall, 43% perceived the child's dissatisfaction with the taste, 31% with consistency and 64% attributed side effects to PPN (nausea, vomiting, loose motion, diarrhoea, abdominal distension and pain). It is to be noted that 47% of children needed encouragement or were forced to eat PPN, while 5% completely rejected it after 3 weeks. Of the 29 CHWs interviewed, 48% were dissatisfied with PPN's taste and consistency, and 55% with its smell. However, 91% of the care givers and all CHWs still perceived a therapeutic benefit of PPN for malnourished children.
CONCLUSION
Despite a therapeutic benefit, only 4 in 10 care givers perceived PPN as being acceptable as a food product, which is of concern.
Countries
Subject Area
Languages
English
