BACKGROUND

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a leading cause of acute viral hepatitis, particularly in Asia and Africa, where HEV genotypes 1 and 2 are prevalent. Although a recombinant vaccine, Hecolin, is available, it has not been used to control outbreaks. The licensed three-dose regimen might pose challenges for it to be an impactful outbreak control tool. Our study aimed to estimate the effectiveness of two doses of Hecolin in the context of the first-ever reactive use of the vaccine.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study during an HEV outbreak in the Bentiu internally displaced persons camp, South Sudan. Patients with acute jaundice syndrome (suspected cases) seeking care at the Médecins Sans Frontières hospital were screened for study eligibility. Eligible participants were those that had been eligible for vaccination (ie, living in the camp and aged 16-40 years). Confirmed cases were defined as individuals who tested positive for hepatitis E by RT-PCR or anti-HEV IgM ELISA. Each case was matched to six controls by age, sex, pregnancy status, and residence. Self-reported vaccination status was verified through vaccination cards. The primary analysis was two-dose vaccine effectiveness, which we estimated with a matched case-control design using conditional logistic regression models. In secondary analyses we estimated vaccine effectiveness using a test-negative design and the screening method. We used test-negative cases and their matched controls as a bias indicator analysis to help quantify potential health seeking behaviour biases.

FINDINGS

Between May 10 and Dec 30, 2022, we identified 859 patients with suspected hepatitis E. Of these, 201 met the eligibility criteria and 21 cases had laboratory confirmed hepatitis E. Among the confirmed cases, 10 (48%) were unvaccinated compared with 33 (27%) of 121 matched controls. In the primary analysis we estimated an unadjusted two-dose vaccine effectiveness of 67·8% (95% CI -28·6 to 91·9), and a two-dose vaccine effectiveness of 84·0% (-208·5 to 99·2) after adjustment for potential confounders. The bias indicator analysis suggested that test-negative cases might have been more likely to have been vaccinated than their matched community controls due to different health-care seeking behaviours, potentially meaning underestimation of effectiveness estimates. The test-negative design, which uses facility-matched controls, led to an adjusted two-dose effectiveness of 89·4% (56·4 to 98·0).

INTERPRETATION

Despite the small sample size, our estimates provide evidence of effectiveness of a two-dose regimen against HEV genotype 1 during a protracted outbreak, supporting its use in similar contexts.

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody self-testing (HCVST) may help expand screening access and support HCV elimination efforts. Despite potential benefits, HCVST is not currently implemented in Pakistan. This study aimed to assess the usability and acceptability of HCVST in a high HCV prevalence informal settlement in Karachi, Pakistan.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study in a hepatitis C clinic from April through June 2023. Participants were invited to perform a saliva-based HCVST (OraSure Technologies, USA) while following pictorial instructions. A study member evaluated test performance using a standardized checklist and provided verbal support if a step could not be completed. Perceived usability and acceptability were assessed using a semi-structured questionnaire. The HCVST was considered successful if the participant was able to complete all steps and correctly interpret test results. Overall concordance and positive and negative agreement were estimated in comparison with the HCVST result read by the study member (inter-reader concordance and agreement) and result of a second rapid HCV test (Abbott Diagnostics Korea Inc, South Korea) performed by a trained user (inter-operator concordance and agreement).

RESULTS

The study included 295 participants of which 97 (32%) were illiterate. In total, 280 (95%, 95% CI 92–97%) HCVSTs were successful. Overall, 38 (13%) people performed the HCVST without verbal assistance, 67 (23%) needed verbal assistance in one step, 190 (64%) in two or more. Assistance was most often needed in managing the test buffer and test reading times. The inter-reader concordance was 96% and inter-operator concordance 93%. Inter-reader and inter-operator positive percent agreement were 84 and 70%, respectively. All participants reported they would use HCVST again and would recommend it to friends and family.

CONCLUSION

Saliva-based HCVST was very well accepted in this clinic-based setting. However, many people requested verbal support in several steps, highlighting the need for clear instructions for use and test devices that are simple to use, particularly in low literacy settings. Moderately low positive percent agreement with the results of a rapid test performed by a trained user highlights potential uncertainty in the accuracy of HCVST in the hands of lay users.

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major cause of liver diseases globally. Transmission is primarily bloodborne through unsafe injections or healthcare practices. Effective treatment exists, yet access to diagnosis and treatment is limited. Few data indicated high HCV exposure among Rohingya refugees/FDMN residing in crowded camps in Cox’s Bazar District, Bangladesh, where Médecins Sans Frontières is pioneering HCV services. Representative information on the prevalence of active HCV infection and exposure risk factors was lacking.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was carried out in May-June 2023, including adults (≥18 years) by simple random geo-sampling (one participant per household, target sample 680), in seven camps (8W, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19) in Cox’s Bazar District. Participants were screened with an HCV-antibody test (SD Bioline), and active infection assessed with Xpert® HCV Viral Load test (Cepheid) if seropositive. A structured questionnaire was administered to identify risk factors of exposure.

RESULTS

Of the 641 participants, median age was 34 years [IQR 28, 46], 66.3% were female. The estimated prevalence of HCV-seropositivity was 29.7% (95%CI: 26.0-22.8), and the prevalence of active infection was 19.6% (16.4-23.2). Multivariable regression revealed higher odds of HCV-seropositivity for female (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.7 (1.0-2.6)), age groups ≥25 years old (aORs ranging from 2.3 to 2.9), reported medical injection(s) (aOR=1.7 (95% CI: 1.0-2.6)) or surgery (aOR=4.7 (95%CI: 1.3-16.7). Half of participants never heard about Hepatitis C, 4.0% of viremic participants reported previous HCV treatment.

CONCLUSION

The survey revealed a significant burden of active HCV infection among adult Rohingya camp residents, which, extrapolated may affect an estimated 86,000 individuals. Urgent action is required to expand diagnosis and treatment to prevent advanced liver disease and transmission. A collaborative task force with camp-based health stakeholders is now underway for a mass screening and treatment initiative, as well as a camp-wide HCV awareness campaign.

BACKGROUND

Globally, 9% of people who inject drugs (PWID), a key hepatitis C-infected population, reside in sub-Saharan Africa. In South Africa, hepatitis C seroprevalence in PWID is high. It is almost 84% in Pretoria and hepatitis C genotypes 1 and 3 predominate. Access to hepatitis C care for PWID is inadequate given low referral rates, socio-structural barriers, homelessness and limited access to harm reduction. Traditional care models do not address the needs of this population. We piloted a simplified complete point-of-service care model, a first of its kind in the country and sub-continental region.

METHODS

Community-based recruitment from Pretoria’s PWID population occurred over 11 months. Participants were screened with point-of-care rapid diagnostic tests for HBsAg (Alere Determine™), hepatitis C and HIV antibodies (OraQuick®). Qualitative HCV viremia was confirmed on site with Genedrive® (Sysmex), similarly at week 4, end of treatment and to confirm sustained virological response. Viremic hepatitis C participants were initiated on 12 weeks of daily sofosbuvir and daclatasvir. Harm reduction and adherence support, through directly observed therapy, peer support, a stipend and transport, was provided.

RESULTS

A total of 163 participants were screened for hepatitis C antibody, and 66% were positive with 80 (87%) viremic. An additional 36 confirmed hepatitis C viremic participants were referred. Of those eligible to initiate treatment, 87 (93%) were commenced on sofosbuvir and daclatasvir, with 98% (n = 85) male, 35% (n = 30) HIV co-infected, 1% (n = 1) HBV co-infected and 5% (n = 4) HIV/HBV/HCV triple infected. Some 67% (n = 58) accessed harm reduction packs, 57% (n = 50) opioid substitution therapy and 18% (n = 16) stopped injecting. A per protocol sustained virological response of 90% (n = 51) was achieved with 14% (n = 7) confirmed reinfections following a sustained virological response. HCV RNA qualitative testing performance was acceptable with all sustained virological responses validated against a laboratory assay. Mild adverse effects were reported in 6% (n = 5). Thirty-eight percent (n = 33) of participants were lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In our setting, a simplified point-of-service hepatitis C care model for PWID yielded an acceptable sustained virological response rate. Retention in care and follow-up remains both challenging and central to success. We have demonstrated the utility of a model of care for our country and region to utilize this more community acceptable and simplified practice.