Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
PLOS Med. 12 September 2024; Volume 21 (Issue 9); e1004428.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004428
Schilling WHK, Mukaka M, Callery JJ, Llewelyn MJ, Cruz CV, et al.
PLOS Med. 12 September 2024; Volume 21 (Issue 9); e1004428.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004428
BACKGROUND
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has proved ineffective in treating patients hospitalised with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), but uncertainty remains over its safety and efficacy in chemoprevention. Previous chemoprevention randomised controlled trials (RCTs) did not individually show benefit of HCQ against COVID-19 and, although meta-analysis did suggest clinical benefit, guidelines recommend against its use.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
Healthy adult participants from the healthcare setting, and later from the community, were enrolled in 26 centres in 11 countries to a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial of COVID-19 chemoprevention. HCQ was evaluated in Europe and Africa, and chloroquine (CQ) was evaluated in Asia, (both base equivalent of 155 mg once daily). The primary endpoint was symptomatic COVID-19, confirmed by PCR or seroconversion during the 3-month follow-up period. The secondary and tertiary endpoints were: asymptomatic laboratory-confirmed Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection; severity of COVID-19 symptoms; all-cause PCR-confirmed symptomatic acute respiratory illness (including SARS-CoV-2 infection); participant reported number of workdays lost; genetic and baseline biochemical markers associated with symptomatic COVID-19, respiratory illness and disease severity (not reported here); and health economic analyses of HCQ and CQ prophylaxis on costs and quality of life measures (not reported here). The primary and safety analyses were conducted in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Recruitment of 40,000 (20,000 HCQ arm, 20,000 CQ arm) participants was planned but was not possible because of protracted delays resulting from controversies over efficacy and adverse events with HCQ use, vaccine rollout in some countries, and other factors. Between 29 April 2020 and 10 March 2022, 4,652 participants (46% females) were enrolled (HCQ/CQ n = 2,320; placebo n = 2,332). The median (IQR) age was 29 (23 to 39) years. SARS-CoV-2 infections (symptomatic and asymptomatic) occurred in 1,071 (23%) participants. For the primary endpoint the incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 was 240/2,320 in the HCQ/CQ versus 284/2,332 in the placebo arms (risk ratio (RR) 0.85 [95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 1.00; p = 0.05]). For the secondary and tertiary outcomes asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections occurred in 11.5% of HCQ/CQ recipients and 12.0% of placebo recipients: RR: 0.96 (95% CI, 0.82 to 1.12; p = 0.6). There were no differences in the severity of symptoms between the groups and no severe illnesses. HCQ/CQ chemoprevention was associated with fewer PCR-confirmed all-cause respiratory infections (predominantly SARS-CoV-2): RR 0.61 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.88; p = 0.009) and fewer days lost to work because of illness: 104 days per 1,000 participants over 90 days (95% CI, 12 to 199 days; p < 0.001). The prespecified meta-analysis of all published pre-exposure RCTs indicates that HCQ/CQ prophylaxis provided a moderate protective benefit against symptomatic COVID-19: RR 0.80 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.91). Both drugs were well tolerated with no drug-related serious adverse events (SAEs). Study limitations include the smaller than planned study size, the relatively low number of PCR-confirmed infections, and the lower comparative accuracy of serology endpoints (in particular, the adapted dried blood spot method) compared to the PCR endpoint. The COPCOV trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov; number NCT04303507.
INTERPRETATION
In this large placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised trial, HCQ and CQ were safe and well tolerated in COVID-19 chemoprevention, and there was evidence of moderate protective benefit in a meta-analysis including this trial and similar RCTs.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 13 November 2013; Volume 2 (Issue 11); e83.; DOI:10.1038/psp.2013.59
Kloprogge F, Piola P, Dhorda M, Muwanga S, Turyakira E, et al.
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 13 November 2013; Volume 2 (Issue 11); e83.; DOI:10.1038/psp.2013.59
Pregnancy alters the pharmacokinetic properties of many antimalarial compounds. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic properties of lumefantrine in pregnant and nonpregnant women with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Uganda after a standard fixed oral artemether-lumefantrine treatment. Dense venous (n = 26) and sparse capillary (n = 90) lumefantrine samples were drawn from pregnant patients. A total of 17 nonpregnant women contributed with dense venous lumefantrine samples. Lumefantrine pharmacokinetics was best described by a flexible absorption model with multiphasic disposition. Pregnancy and body temperature had a significant impact on the pharmacokinetic properties of lumefantrine. Simulations from the final model indicated 27% lower day 7 concentrations in pregnant women compared with nonpregnant women and a decreased median time of 0.92 and 0.42 days above previously defined critical concentration cutoff values (280 and 175 ng/ml, respectively). The standard artemether-lumefantrine dose regimen in P. falciparum malaria may need reevaluation in nonimmune pregnant women.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Clin Pharmacol Ther
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 1 June 2019
Chotsiri P, Denoeud-Ndam L, Baudin E, Guindo O, Diawara H, et al.
Clin Pharmacol Ther
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 1 June 2019
Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) has been reported to be associated with increased malaria morbidity in Sub‐Saharan African children and may affect the pharmacology of antimalarial drugs. This population pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic study included 131 SAM and 266 non‐SAM children administered artemether‐lumefantrine twice daily for 3 days. Lumefantrine capillary plasma concentrations were adequately described by two transit‐absorption compartments followed by two distribution compartments. Allometrically scaled body weight and an enzymatic maturation effect were included in the pharmacokinetic model. Mid‐upper arm circumference (MUAC) was associated with decreased absorption of lumefantrine (25.4% decrease per 1 cm reduction). Risk of recurrent malaria episodes (i.e. reinfection) were characterised by an interval‐censored time‐to‐event model with a sigmoid EMAX‐model describing the effect of lumefantrine. SAM children were at risk of under‐exposure to lumefantrine and an increased risk of malaria reinfection compared to well‐nourished children. Research on optimised regimens should be considered for malaria treatment in malnourished children.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Clin Pharmacol Ther
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 25 October 2019; Volume 107 (Issue 5); 1179-1188.; DOI:10.1002/cpt.1707
Ding J, Coldiron ME, Assao B, Guindo O, Blessborn D, et al.
Clin Pharmacol Ther
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 25 October 2019; Volume 107 (Issue 5); 1179-1188.; DOI:10.1002/cpt.1707
Poor adherence to seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) might affect the protective effectiveness of SMC. Here, we evaluated the population pharmacokinetic properties of amodiaquine and its active metabolite, desethylamodiaquine, in children receiving SMC under directly observed ideal conditions (n = 136), and the adherence of SMC at an implementation phase in children participating in a case-control study to evaluate SMC effectiveness (n = 869). Amodiaquine and desethylamodiaquine concentration-time profiles were described simultaneously by two-compartment and three-compartment disposition models, respectively. The developed methodology to evaluate adherence showed a sensitivity of 65-71% when the first dose of SMC was directly observed and 71-73% when no doses were observed in a routine programmatic setting. Adherence simulations and measured desethylamodiaquine concentrations in the case-control children showed complete adherence (all doses taken) in < 20% of children. This result suggests that more efforts are needed urgently to improve the adherence to SMC among children in this area.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Malar J. 9 September 2021; Volume 20 (Issue 1); 366.; DOI:10.1186/s12936-021-03886-w
Taylor WRJ, Hoglund RM, Peerawaranun P, Nguyen TN, Hien TT, et al.
Malar J. 9 September 2021; Volume 20 (Issue 1); 366.; DOI:10.1186/s12936-021-03886-w
BACKGROUND
In many endemic areas, Plasmodium vivax malaria is predominantly a disease of young adults and children. International recommendations for radical cure recommend fixed target doses of 0.25 or 0.5 mg/kg/day of primaquine for 14 days in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase normal patients of all ages. However, for many anti-malarial drugs, including primaquine, there is evidence that children have lower exposures than adults for the same weight-adjusted dose. The aim of the study was to develop 14-day weight-based and age-based primaquine regimens against high-frequency relapsing tropical P. vivax.
METHODS
The recommended adult target dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day (30 mg in a 60 kg patient) is highly efficacious against tropical P. vivax and was assumed to produce optimal drug exposure. Primaquine doses were calculated using allometric scaling to derive a weight-based primaquine regimen over a weight range from 5 to 100 kg. Growth curves were constructed from an anthropometric database of 53,467 individuals from the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) to define weight-for-age relationships. The median age associated with each weight was used to derive an age-based dosing regimen from the weight-based regimen.
RESULTS
The proposed weight-based regimen has 5 dosing bands: (i) 5-7 kg, 5 mg, resulting in 0.71-1.0 mg/kg/day; (ii) 8-16 kg, 7.5 mg, 0.47-0.94 mg/kg/day; (iii) 17-40 kg, 15 mg, 0.38-0.88 mg/kg/day; (iv) 41-80 kg, 30 mg, 0.37-0.73 mg/kg/day; and (v) 81-100 kg, 45 mg, 0.45-0.56 mg/kg/day. The corresponding age-based regimen had 4 dosing bands: 6-11 months, 5 mg, 0.43-1.0 mg/kg/day; (ii) 1-5 years, 7.5 mg, 0.35-1.25 mg/kg/day; (iii) 6-14 years, 15 mg, 0.30-1.36 mg/kg/day; and (iv) ≥ 15 years, 30 mg, 0.35-1.07 mg/kg/day.
CONCLUSION
The proposed weight-based regimen showed less variability around the primaquine dose within each dosing band compared to the age-based regimen and is preferred. Increased dose accuracy could be achieved by additional dosing bands for both regimens. The age-based regimen might not be applicable to regions outside the GMS, which must be based on local anthropometric data. Pharmacokinetic data in small children are needed urgently to inform the proposed regimens.
In many endemic areas, Plasmodium vivax malaria is predominantly a disease of young adults and children. International recommendations for radical cure recommend fixed target doses of 0.25 or 0.5 mg/kg/day of primaquine for 14 days in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase normal patients of all ages. However, for many anti-malarial drugs, including primaquine, there is evidence that children have lower exposures than adults for the same weight-adjusted dose. The aim of the study was to develop 14-day weight-based and age-based primaquine regimens against high-frequency relapsing tropical P. vivax.
METHODS
The recommended adult target dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day (30 mg in a 60 kg patient) is highly efficacious against tropical P. vivax and was assumed to produce optimal drug exposure. Primaquine doses were calculated using allometric scaling to derive a weight-based primaquine regimen over a weight range from 5 to 100 kg. Growth curves were constructed from an anthropometric database of 53,467 individuals from the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) to define weight-for-age relationships. The median age associated with each weight was used to derive an age-based dosing regimen from the weight-based regimen.
RESULTS
The proposed weight-based regimen has 5 dosing bands: (i) 5-7 kg, 5 mg, resulting in 0.71-1.0 mg/kg/day; (ii) 8-16 kg, 7.5 mg, 0.47-0.94 mg/kg/day; (iii) 17-40 kg, 15 mg, 0.38-0.88 mg/kg/day; (iv) 41-80 kg, 30 mg, 0.37-0.73 mg/kg/day; and (v) 81-100 kg, 45 mg, 0.45-0.56 mg/kg/day. The corresponding age-based regimen had 4 dosing bands: 6-11 months, 5 mg, 0.43-1.0 mg/kg/day; (ii) 1-5 years, 7.5 mg, 0.35-1.25 mg/kg/day; (iii) 6-14 years, 15 mg, 0.30-1.36 mg/kg/day; and (iv) ≥ 15 years, 30 mg, 0.35-1.07 mg/kg/day.
CONCLUSION
The proposed weight-based regimen showed less variability around the primaquine dose within each dosing band compared to the age-based regimen and is preferred. Increased dose accuracy could be achieved by additional dosing bands for both regimens. The age-based regimen might not be applicable to regions outside the GMS, which must be based on local anthropometric data. Pharmacokinetic data in small children are needed urgently to inform the proposed regimens.
Journal Article > ReviewFull Text
BMC Med. 29 October 2018; Volume 16 (Issue 1); 186.; DOI:10.1186/s12916-018-1177-5
Das D, Grais RF, Okiro EA, Stepniewska K, Mansoor R, et al.
BMC Med. 29 October 2018; Volume 16 (Issue 1); 186.; DOI:10.1186/s12916-018-1177-5
Despite substantial improvement in the control of malaria and decreased prevalence of malnutrition over the past two decades, both conditions remain heavy burdens that cause hundreds of thousands of deaths in children in resource-poor countries every year. Better understanding of the complex interactions between malaria and malnutrition is crucial for optimally targeting interventions where both conditions co-exist. This systematic review aimed to assess the evidence of the interplay between malaria and malnutrition.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
PLOS Med. 12 June 2018; Volume 15 (Issue 6); DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002579
Kloprogge F, Workman L, Borrmann S, Tekete M, Lefevre G, et al.
PLOS Med. 12 June 2018; Volume 15 (Issue 6); DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002579
The fixed dose combination of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) is the most widely used treatment for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Relatively lower cure rates and lumefantrine levels have been reported in young children and in pregnant women during their second and third trimester. The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of lumefantrine and the pharmacokinetic properties of its metabolite, desbutyl-lumefantrine, in order to inform optimal dosing regimens in all patient populations.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Malar J. 5 July 2019; Volume 18 (Issue 1); 225.; DOI:10.1186/s12936-019-2837-4.
WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network Methodology Study Group, Dahal P, Simpson JA, Abdulla S, Achan J, et al.
Malar J. 5 July 2019; Volume 18 (Issue 1); 225.; DOI:10.1186/s12936-019-2837-4.
BACKGROUND
Therapeutic efficacy studies in uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria are confounded by new infections, which constitute competing risk events since they can potentially preclude/pre-empt the detection of subsequent recrudescence of persistent, sub-microscopic primary infections.
METHODS
Antimalarial studies typically report the risk of recrudescence derived using the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method, which considers new infections acquired during the follow-up period as censored. Cumulative Incidence Function (CIF) provides an alternative approach for handling new infections, which accounts for them as a competing risk event. The complement of the estimate derived using the K-M method (1 minus K-M), and the CIF were used to derive the risk of recrudescence at the end of the follow-up period using data from studies collated in the WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network data repository. Absolute differences in the failure estimates derived using these two methods were quantified. In comparative studies, the equality of two K-M curves was assessed using the log-rank test, and the equality of CIFs using Gray's k-sample test (both at 5% level of significance). Two different regression modelling strategies for recrudescence were considered: cause-specific Cox model and Fine and Gray's sub-distributional hazard model.
RESULTS
Data were available from 92 studies (233 treatment arms, 31,379 patients) conducted between 1996 and 2014. At the end of follow-up, the median absolute overestimation in the estimated risk of cumulative recrudescence by using 1 minus K-M approach was 0.04% (interquartile range (IQR): 0.00-0.27%, Range: 0.00-3.60%). The overestimation was correlated positively with the proportion of patients with recrudescence [Pearson's correlation coefficient (ρ): 0.38, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.30-0.46] or new infection [ρ: 0.43; 95% CI 0.35-0.54]. In three study arms, the point estimates of failure were greater than 10% (the WHO threshold for withdrawing antimalarials) when the K-M method was used, but remained below 10% when using the CIF approach, but the 95% confidence interval included this threshold.
CONCLUSIONS
The 1 minus K-M method resulted in a marginal overestimation of recrudescence that became increasingly pronounced as antimalarial efficacy declined, particularly when the observed proportion of new infection was high. The CIF approach provides an alternative approach for derivation of failure estimates in antimalarial trials, particularly in high transmission settings.
Therapeutic efficacy studies in uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria are confounded by new infections, which constitute competing risk events since they can potentially preclude/pre-empt the detection of subsequent recrudescence of persistent, sub-microscopic primary infections.
METHODS
Antimalarial studies typically report the risk of recrudescence derived using the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method, which considers new infections acquired during the follow-up period as censored. Cumulative Incidence Function (CIF) provides an alternative approach for handling new infections, which accounts for them as a competing risk event. The complement of the estimate derived using the K-M method (1 minus K-M), and the CIF were used to derive the risk of recrudescence at the end of the follow-up period using data from studies collated in the WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network data repository. Absolute differences in the failure estimates derived using these two methods were quantified. In comparative studies, the equality of two K-M curves was assessed using the log-rank test, and the equality of CIFs using Gray's k-sample test (both at 5% level of significance). Two different regression modelling strategies for recrudescence were considered: cause-specific Cox model and Fine and Gray's sub-distributional hazard model.
RESULTS
Data were available from 92 studies (233 treatment arms, 31,379 patients) conducted between 1996 and 2014. At the end of follow-up, the median absolute overestimation in the estimated risk of cumulative recrudescence by using 1 minus K-M approach was 0.04% (interquartile range (IQR): 0.00-0.27%, Range: 0.00-3.60%). The overestimation was correlated positively with the proportion of patients with recrudescence [Pearson's correlation coefficient (ρ): 0.38, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.30-0.46] or new infection [ρ: 0.43; 95% CI 0.35-0.54]. In three study arms, the point estimates of failure were greater than 10% (the WHO threshold for withdrawing antimalarials) when the K-M method was used, but remained below 10% when using the CIF approach, but the 95% confidence interval included this threshold.
CONCLUSIONS
The 1 minus K-M method resulted in a marginal overestimation of recrudescence that became increasingly pronounced as antimalarial efficacy declined, particularly when the observed proportion of new infection was high. The CIF approach provides an alternative approach for derivation of failure estimates in antimalarial trials, particularly in high transmission settings.
Conference Material > Abstract
Ding J, Coldiron ME, Assao B, Guindo O, Blessborn D, et al.
MSF Scientific Days International 2020: Research. 20 May 2020
INTRODUCTION
Seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) has been widely implemented by MSF in the African Sahel. It consists of monthly courses of antimalarial drugs during the high-risk season. A single dose of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and a dose of amodiaquine (AQ) are administered by a health worker, and doses of AQ are administered by caregivers at home on the following two days. Poor adherence to AQ might reduce the protective effectiveness of SMC. In an area of Niger where MSF was concerned about the effectiveness of SMC, we performed a study to describe the population pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of AQ when administered as part of SMC. These data were used to develop models describing adherence to SMC among children participating in a case-control study performed in the same area.
METHODS
A convenience sample of 165 children aged 3-59 months was enrolled in Magaria, Niger, in November 2016. All three doses of SMC were administered at home by nurses, and then blood samples were drawn in six predefined sampling windows over the following six weeks. Drug concentrations were determined using a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry-based assay. Concentration-time data were evaluated simultaneously using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling in the software NONMEM (Icon, Hanover, USA). In the case-control study, one-half (n=297) of cases and their 859 healthy village- and age-matched controls were randomly selected to be analysed for drug concentrations and adherence.
ETHICS
This study was approved by the MSF Ethical Review Board and the Comité Consultatif National d’Éthique of Niger.
RESULTS
We used two-compartment and three-compartment disposition models respectively to describe AQ and desethylamodiaquine (DEAQ) concentration-time profiles. This method for evaluation of adherence showed a sensitivity of 65-71%, when the first dose of SMC was directly observed by a health worker. Among case-control study participants, modelled adherence simulations and measured DEAQ concentrations showed poor adherence. Using the optimal model, only 7% of cases and 8% of controls had complete adherence to AQ. Even when using the most conservative cut-offs in the model (5th percentile of DEAQ concentration), only 10% of cases and 17% of controls had complete adherence.
CONCLUSION
To our knowledge, this is the first description of the population pharmacokinetics of AQ when used in the setting of SMC; the model was robust and showed good predictive performance. Despite community engagement efforts, adherence to SMC was very poor in this setting. Efforts to improve adherence are urgently needed, both to protect children against malaria and to prevent emergence of resistance to SP and AQ.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
None declared.
Seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) has been widely implemented by MSF in the African Sahel. It consists of monthly courses of antimalarial drugs during the high-risk season. A single dose of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and a dose of amodiaquine (AQ) are administered by a health worker, and doses of AQ are administered by caregivers at home on the following two days. Poor adherence to AQ might reduce the protective effectiveness of SMC. In an area of Niger where MSF was concerned about the effectiveness of SMC, we performed a study to describe the population pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of AQ when administered as part of SMC. These data were used to develop models describing adherence to SMC among children participating in a case-control study performed in the same area.
METHODS
A convenience sample of 165 children aged 3-59 months was enrolled in Magaria, Niger, in November 2016. All three doses of SMC were administered at home by nurses, and then blood samples were drawn in six predefined sampling windows over the following six weeks. Drug concentrations were determined using a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry-based assay. Concentration-time data were evaluated simultaneously using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling in the software NONMEM (Icon, Hanover, USA). In the case-control study, one-half (n=297) of cases and their 859 healthy village- and age-matched controls were randomly selected to be analysed for drug concentrations and adherence.
ETHICS
This study was approved by the MSF Ethical Review Board and the Comité Consultatif National d’Éthique of Niger.
RESULTS
We used two-compartment and three-compartment disposition models respectively to describe AQ and desethylamodiaquine (DEAQ) concentration-time profiles. This method for evaluation of adherence showed a sensitivity of 65-71%, when the first dose of SMC was directly observed by a health worker. Among case-control study participants, modelled adherence simulations and measured DEAQ concentrations showed poor adherence. Using the optimal model, only 7% of cases and 8% of controls had complete adherence to AQ. Even when using the most conservative cut-offs in the model (5th percentile of DEAQ concentration), only 10% of cases and 17% of controls had complete adherence.
CONCLUSION
To our knowledge, this is the first description of the population pharmacokinetics of AQ when used in the setting of SMC; the model was robust and showed good predictive performance. Despite community engagement efforts, adherence to SMC was very poor in this setting. Efforts to improve adherence are urgently needed, both to protect children against malaria and to prevent emergence of resistance to SP and AQ.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
None declared.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 5 August 2013; Volume 57 (Issue 10); DOI:10.1128/AAC.00683-13
Tarning J, Kloprogge F, Dhorda M, Jullien V, Nosten F, et al.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 5 August 2013; Volume 57 (Issue 10); DOI:10.1128/AAC.00683-13