Conference Material > Abstract
Natukunda N
Epicentre Scientific Day Paris 2023. 2023 June 8
BACKGROUND
Childhood tuberculosis is underdiagnosed at low-level healthcare settings because of poor access to specimen collection, rapid molecular testing, clinical evaluation and chest radiography. Decentralizing childhood tuberculosis diagnosis at district hospital (DH) and primary health centre (PHC) levels could improve case detection.
METHODS
TB-Speed decentralisation is an operational research using a pre-post intervention cross-sectional design in 12 DHs and 47 PHCs of 12 districts in Cambodia, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Mozambique, Sierra Leone and Uganda. The intervention included a comprehensive childhood tuberculosis diagnosis package consisting of systematic tuberculosis screening for all under-15-year-old sick children, clinical evaluation, Xpert Ultra-testing on one nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA) and stool samples, and chest radiography for children with presumptive tuberculosis, using either PHC-focused or DH-focused decentralization approaches. We collected aggregated and individual data for children whose parents consented. We present the comparison of the proportion of tuberculosis case detected pre-intervention from August 2018 to Nov 2019 versus post-intervention from March 2020 to September 2021, overall and by decentralization approach, and the uptake and acceptability of the diagnostic package in Uganda.
FINDINGS
In Uganda, 52233 and 46035 children attended care pre-intervention versus post-intervention respectively. 26/52233 (0.05%) and 42/46035 (0.09%) children were diagnosed with tuberculosis pre-intervention and post-intervention respectively, p-value=0.114. In DH-focused district, it was 10/24208 (0.04%) and 23/17914 (0.1%) pre-intervention and post-intervention respectively, and 16/28025 (0.06%) and 19/28121 (0.1%) for PHC-districts, respectively. The uptake of TB screening was 43104/46035 (93.6%) overall, among the 732 enrolled children 724/ and 532 had a valid Ultra result using NPA and stool, respectively. Health care workers overall experienced decentralized childhood TB diagnostic as acceptable, with NPA and stool sample collection feasible both at DH and PHC.
CONCLUSION
Decentralizing innovative childhood tuberculosis diagnosis can increase tuberculosis case detection with limited impact when using the PHC decentralization approach.
KEY MESSAGE
Although decentralizing childhood TB diagnosis is acceptable, overcoming feasibility issues may improve the effective implementation and scale-up of such interventions at low levels of care.
This abstract is not to be quoted for publication.
Childhood tuberculosis is underdiagnosed at low-level healthcare settings because of poor access to specimen collection, rapid molecular testing, clinical evaluation and chest radiography. Decentralizing childhood tuberculosis diagnosis at district hospital (DH) and primary health centre (PHC) levels could improve case detection.
METHODS
TB-Speed decentralisation is an operational research using a pre-post intervention cross-sectional design in 12 DHs and 47 PHCs of 12 districts in Cambodia, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Mozambique, Sierra Leone and Uganda. The intervention included a comprehensive childhood tuberculosis diagnosis package consisting of systematic tuberculosis screening for all under-15-year-old sick children, clinical evaluation, Xpert Ultra-testing on one nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA) and stool samples, and chest radiography for children with presumptive tuberculosis, using either PHC-focused or DH-focused decentralization approaches. We collected aggregated and individual data for children whose parents consented. We present the comparison of the proportion of tuberculosis case detected pre-intervention from August 2018 to Nov 2019 versus post-intervention from March 2020 to September 2021, overall and by decentralization approach, and the uptake and acceptability of the diagnostic package in Uganda.
FINDINGS
In Uganda, 52233 and 46035 children attended care pre-intervention versus post-intervention respectively. 26/52233 (0.05%) and 42/46035 (0.09%) children were diagnosed with tuberculosis pre-intervention and post-intervention respectively, p-value=0.114. In DH-focused district, it was 10/24208 (0.04%) and 23/17914 (0.1%) pre-intervention and post-intervention respectively, and 16/28025 (0.06%) and 19/28121 (0.1%) for PHC-districts, respectively. The uptake of TB screening was 43104/46035 (93.6%) overall, among the 732 enrolled children 724/ and 532 had a valid Ultra result using NPA and stool, respectively. Health care workers overall experienced decentralized childhood TB diagnostic as acceptable, with NPA and stool sample collection feasible both at DH and PHC.
CONCLUSION
Decentralizing innovative childhood tuberculosis diagnosis can increase tuberculosis case detection with limited impact when using the PHC decentralization approach.
KEY MESSAGE
Although decentralizing childhood TB diagnosis is acceptable, overcoming feasibility issues may improve the effective implementation and scale-up of such interventions at low levels of care.
This abstract is not to be quoted for publication.
Journal Article > ResearchAbstract
N Engl J Med. 2020 June 18; Volume 382; 2397-2410.; DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1910708
Blanc FX, Badje AD, Bonnet MMB, Gabillard D, Messou E, et al.
N Engl J Med. 2020 June 18; Volume 382; 2397-2410.; DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1910708
BACKGROUND
In regions with high burdens of tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), many HIV-infected adults begin antiretroviral therapy (ART) when they are already severely immunocompromised. Mortality after ART initiation is high in these patients, and tuberculosis and invasive bacterial diseases are common causes of death.
METHODS
We conducted a 48-week trial of empirical treatment for tuberculosis as compared with treatment guided by testing in HIV-infected adults who had not previously received ART and had CD4+ T-cell counts below 100 cells per cubic millimeter. Patients recruited in Ivory Coast, Uganda, Cambodia, and Vietnam were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo screening (Xpert MTB/RIF test, urinary lipoarabinomannan test, and chest radiography) to determine whether treatment for tuberculosis should be started or to receive systematic empirical treatment with rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide daily for 2 months, followed by rifampin and isoniazid daily for 4 months. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause or invasive bacterial disease within 24 weeks (primary analysis) or within 48 weeks after randomization.
RESULTS
A total of 522 patients in the systematic-treatment group and 525 in the guided-treatment group were included in the analyses. At week 24, the rate of death from any cause or invasive bacterial disease (calculated as the number of first events per 100 patient-years) was 19.4 with systematic treatment and 20.3 with guided treatment (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 1.44). At week 48, the corresponding rates were 12.8 and 13.3 (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.67 to 1.40]). At week 24, the probability of tuberculosis was lower with systematic treatment than with guided treatment (3.0% vs. 17.9%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.26), but the probability of grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events was higher with systematic treatment (17.4% vs. 7.2%; adjusted hazard ratio 2.57; 95% CI, 1.75 to 3.78). Serious adverse events were more common with systematic treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
Among severely immunosuppressed adults with HIV infection who had not previously received ART, systematic treatment for tuberculosis was not superior to test-guided treatment in reducing the rate of death or invasive bacterial disease over 24 or 48 weeks and was associated with more grade 3 or 4 adverse events.
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02057796
In regions with high burdens of tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), many HIV-infected adults begin antiretroviral therapy (ART) when they are already severely immunocompromised. Mortality after ART initiation is high in these patients, and tuberculosis and invasive bacterial diseases are common causes of death.
METHODS
We conducted a 48-week trial of empirical treatment for tuberculosis as compared with treatment guided by testing in HIV-infected adults who had not previously received ART and had CD4+ T-cell counts below 100 cells per cubic millimeter. Patients recruited in Ivory Coast, Uganda, Cambodia, and Vietnam were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo screening (Xpert MTB/RIF test, urinary lipoarabinomannan test, and chest radiography) to determine whether treatment for tuberculosis should be started or to receive systematic empirical treatment with rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide daily for 2 months, followed by rifampin and isoniazid daily for 4 months. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause or invasive bacterial disease within 24 weeks (primary analysis) or within 48 weeks after randomization.
RESULTS
A total of 522 patients in the systematic-treatment group and 525 in the guided-treatment group were included in the analyses. At week 24, the rate of death from any cause or invasive bacterial disease (calculated as the number of first events per 100 patient-years) was 19.4 with systematic treatment and 20.3 with guided treatment (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 1.44). At week 48, the corresponding rates were 12.8 and 13.3 (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.67 to 1.40]). At week 24, the probability of tuberculosis was lower with systematic treatment than with guided treatment (3.0% vs. 17.9%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.26), but the probability of grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events was higher with systematic treatment (17.4% vs. 7.2%; adjusted hazard ratio 2.57; 95% CI, 1.75 to 3.78). Serious adverse events were more common with systematic treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
Among severely immunosuppressed adults with HIV infection who had not previously received ART, systematic treatment for tuberculosis was not superior to test-guided treatment in reducing the rate of death or invasive bacterial disease over 24 or 48 weeks and was associated with more grade 3 or 4 adverse events.
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02057796
Conference Material > Video (talk)
Natukunda N
Epicentre Scientific Day Paris 2023. 2023 June 8
English
Français
Journal Article > ResearchAbstract Only
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 March 8; Online ahead of print; DOI:10.1093/cid/ciad125
Bonnet MMB, Gabillard D, Domoua SK, Muzoora C, Messou E, et al.
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 March 8; Online ahead of print; DOI:10.1093/cid/ciad125
BACKGROUND
In people with HIV (PWH), the WHO-recommended tuberculosis four-symptom screen (W4SS) targeting those who need molecular rapid test may be suboptimal. We assessed the performance of different tuberculosis screening approaches in severely immunosuppressed PWH enrolled in the guided-treatment group of the STATIS trial (NCT02057796).
METHODS
Ambulatory PWH with no overt evidence of tuberculosis and CD4 cell count <100/µL were screened for tuberculosis prior to antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation with W4SS, chest X-ray, urine lipoarabinomannan (LAM) test and sputum Xpert MTB/RIF® (Xpert). Correctly and wrongly identified cases by screening approaches were assessed overall and by CD4 count threshold (≤50 and 51-99 cells/µL).
RESULTS
Of 525 enrolled participants (median CD4 cell count: 28/µL), 48 (9.9%) were diagnosed with tuberculosis at enrollment. Among participants with a negative W4SS, 16% had either a positive Xpert, a chest X-ray suggestive of tuberculosis or a positive urine LAM test. The combination of sputum Xpert and urine LAM test was associated with the highest proportion of participants correctly identified as tuberculosis (95.8%) and non-tuberculosis cases (95.4%), with proportions equally high among participants with CD4 counts above or below 50 cells/µL. Restricting the use of sputum Xpert, urine LAM test or chest X-ray to participants with a positive W4SS reduced the proportion of wrongly and correctly identified cases.
CONCLUSIONS
There is a clear benefit to perform both sputum Xpert and urine LAM tests as tuberculosis screening in all severely immunosuppressed PWH prior to ART initiation, and not only in those with a positive W4SS.
In people with HIV (PWH), the WHO-recommended tuberculosis four-symptom screen (W4SS) targeting those who need molecular rapid test may be suboptimal. We assessed the performance of different tuberculosis screening approaches in severely immunosuppressed PWH enrolled in the guided-treatment group of the STATIS trial (NCT02057796).
METHODS
Ambulatory PWH with no overt evidence of tuberculosis and CD4 cell count <100/µL were screened for tuberculosis prior to antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation with W4SS, chest X-ray, urine lipoarabinomannan (LAM) test and sputum Xpert MTB/RIF® (Xpert). Correctly and wrongly identified cases by screening approaches were assessed overall and by CD4 count threshold (≤50 and 51-99 cells/µL).
RESULTS
Of 525 enrolled participants (median CD4 cell count: 28/µL), 48 (9.9%) were diagnosed with tuberculosis at enrollment. Among participants with a negative W4SS, 16% had either a positive Xpert, a chest X-ray suggestive of tuberculosis or a positive urine LAM test. The combination of sputum Xpert and urine LAM test was associated with the highest proportion of participants correctly identified as tuberculosis (95.8%) and non-tuberculosis cases (95.4%), with proportions equally high among participants with CD4 counts above or below 50 cells/µL. Restricting the use of sputum Xpert, urine LAM test or chest X-ray to participants with a positive W4SS reduced the proportion of wrongly and correctly identified cases.
CONCLUSIONS
There is a clear benefit to perform both sputum Xpert and urine LAM tests as tuberculosis screening in all severely immunosuppressed PWH prior to ART initiation, and not only in those with a positive W4SS.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 March 1; Volume 23 (Issue 3); 341-351.; DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00668-5
Marcy O, Wobudeya E, Font H, Vessière A, Chabala C, et al.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 March 1; Volume 23 (Issue 3); 341-351.; DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00668-5
BACKGROUND
Tuberculosis diagnosis might be delayed or missed in children with severe pneumonia because this diagnosis is usually only considered in cases of prolonged symptoms or antibiotic failure. Systematic tuberculosis detection at hospital admission could increase case detection and reduce mortality.
METHODS
We did a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial in 16 hospitals from six countries (Cambodia, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Mozambique, Uganda, and Zambia) with high incidence of tuberculosis. Children younger than 5 years with WHO-defined severe pneumonia received either the standard of care (control group) or standard of care plus Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra; Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) on nasopharyngeal aspirate and stool samples (intervention group). Clusters (hospitals) were progressively switched from control to intervention at 5-week intervals, using a computer-generated random sequence, stratified on incidence rate of tuberculosis at country level, and masked to teams until 5 weeks before switch. We assessed the effect of the intervention on primary (12-week all-cause mortality) and secondary (including tuberculosis diagnosis) outcomes, using generalised linear mixed models. The primary analysis was by intention to treat. We described outcomes in children with severe acute malnutrition in a post hoc analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03831906) and the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR202101615120643).
FINDINGS
From March 21, 2019, to March 30, 2021, we enrolled 1401 children in the control group and 1169 children in the intervention group. In the intervention group, 1140 (97·5%) children had nasopharyngeal aspirates and 942 (80·6%) had their stool collected; 24 (2·1%) had positive Xpert Ultra. At 12 weeks, 110 (7·9%) children in the control group and 91 (7·8%) children in the intervention group had died (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0·986, 95% CI 0·597-1·630, p=0·957), and 74 (5·3%) children in the control group and 88 (7·5%) children in the intervention group had tuberculosis diagnosed (adjusted OR 1·238, 95% CI 0·696-2·202, p=0·467). In children with severe acute malnutrition, 57 (23·8%) of 240 children in the control group and 53 (17·8%) of 297 children in the intervention group died, and 36 (15·0%) of 240 children in the control group and 56 (18·9%) of 297 children in the intervention group were diagnosed with tuberculosis. The main adverse events associated with nasopharyngeal aspirates were samples with blood in 312 (27·3%) of 1147 children with nasopharyngeal aspirates attempted, dyspnoea or SpO2 less than 95% in 134 (11·4%) of children, and transient respiratory distress or SpO2 less than 90% in 59 (5·2%) children. There was no serious adverse event related to nasopharyngeal aspirates reported during the trial.
INTERPRETATION
Systematic molecular tuberculosis detection at hospital admission did not reduce mortality in children with severe pneumonia. High treatment and microbiological confirmation rates support more systematic use of Xpert Ultra in this group, notably in children with severe acute malnutrition.
Tuberculosis diagnosis might be delayed or missed in children with severe pneumonia because this diagnosis is usually only considered in cases of prolonged symptoms or antibiotic failure. Systematic tuberculosis detection at hospital admission could increase case detection and reduce mortality.
METHODS
We did a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial in 16 hospitals from six countries (Cambodia, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Mozambique, Uganda, and Zambia) with high incidence of tuberculosis. Children younger than 5 years with WHO-defined severe pneumonia received either the standard of care (control group) or standard of care plus Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra; Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) on nasopharyngeal aspirate and stool samples (intervention group). Clusters (hospitals) were progressively switched from control to intervention at 5-week intervals, using a computer-generated random sequence, stratified on incidence rate of tuberculosis at country level, and masked to teams until 5 weeks before switch. We assessed the effect of the intervention on primary (12-week all-cause mortality) and secondary (including tuberculosis diagnosis) outcomes, using generalised linear mixed models. The primary analysis was by intention to treat. We described outcomes in children with severe acute malnutrition in a post hoc analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03831906) and the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR202101615120643).
FINDINGS
From March 21, 2019, to March 30, 2021, we enrolled 1401 children in the control group and 1169 children in the intervention group. In the intervention group, 1140 (97·5%) children had nasopharyngeal aspirates and 942 (80·6%) had their stool collected; 24 (2·1%) had positive Xpert Ultra. At 12 weeks, 110 (7·9%) children in the control group and 91 (7·8%) children in the intervention group had died (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0·986, 95% CI 0·597-1·630, p=0·957), and 74 (5·3%) children in the control group and 88 (7·5%) children in the intervention group had tuberculosis diagnosed (adjusted OR 1·238, 95% CI 0·696-2·202, p=0·467). In children with severe acute malnutrition, 57 (23·8%) of 240 children in the control group and 53 (17·8%) of 297 children in the intervention group died, and 36 (15·0%) of 240 children in the control group and 56 (18·9%) of 297 children in the intervention group were diagnosed with tuberculosis. The main adverse events associated with nasopharyngeal aspirates were samples with blood in 312 (27·3%) of 1147 children with nasopharyngeal aspirates attempted, dyspnoea or SpO2 less than 95% in 134 (11·4%) of children, and transient respiratory distress or SpO2 less than 90% in 59 (5·2%) children. There was no serious adverse event related to nasopharyngeal aspirates reported during the trial.
INTERPRETATION
Systematic molecular tuberculosis detection at hospital admission did not reduce mortality in children with severe pneumonia. High treatment and microbiological confirmation rates support more systematic use of Xpert Ultra in this group, notably in children with severe acute malnutrition.
Journal Article > ResearchAbstract Only
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2022 March 1; Volume 26 (Issue 3); 243-251.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.21.0317
Joshi B, Font H, Wobudeya E, Nanfuka M, Kobusingye A, et al.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2022 March 1; Volume 26 (Issue 3); 243-251.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.21.0317
BACKGROUND
Increasing childhood TB case detection requires the deployment of diagnostic services at peripheral healthcare level. Capacity and readiness of healthcare workers (HCWs) are key to the delivery of innovative approaches.
METHODS
In 2019, HCWs from five district hospitals (DHs) and 20 primary healthcare centres (PHCs) in Cambodia, Cameroon, Cote d´Ivoire, Sierra Leone and Uganda completed a self-administered knowledge-attitudes-practices (KAP) questionnaire on childhood TB. We computed knowledge and attitudes as scores and identified HCW characteristics associated with knowledge scores using linear regression.
RESULT
Of 636 eligible HCWs, 497 (78%) participated. Median knowledge scores per country ranged between 7.4 and 12.1 (/18). Median attitude scores ranged between 2.8 and 3.3 (/4). Between 13.3% and 34.4% of HCWs reported diagnosing childhood with (presumptive) TB few times a week. Practising at PHC level, being female, being involved in indirect TB care, having a non-permanent position, having no previous research experience and working in Cambodia, Cameroon, Cote d´Ivoire and Sierra Leone as compared to Uganda were associated with a lower knowledge score.
CONCLUSION
HCWs had overall limited knowledge, favourable attitudes and little practice of childhood TB diagnosis. Increasing HCW awareness, capacity and skills, and improving access to effective diagnosis are urgently needed.
Increasing childhood TB case detection requires the deployment of diagnostic services at peripheral healthcare level. Capacity and readiness of healthcare workers (HCWs) are key to the delivery of innovative approaches.
METHODS
In 2019, HCWs from five district hospitals (DHs) and 20 primary healthcare centres (PHCs) in Cambodia, Cameroon, Cote d´Ivoire, Sierra Leone and Uganda completed a self-administered knowledge-attitudes-practices (KAP) questionnaire on childhood TB. We computed knowledge and attitudes as scores and identified HCW characteristics associated with knowledge scores using linear regression.
RESULT
Of 636 eligible HCWs, 497 (78%) participated. Median knowledge scores per country ranged between 7.4 and 12.1 (/18). Median attitude scores ranged between 2.8 and 3.3 (/4). Between 13.3% and 34.4% of HCWs reported diagnosing childhood with (presumptive) TB few times a week. Practising at PHC level, being female, being involved in indirect TB care, having a non-permanent position, having no previous research experience and working in Cambodia, Cameroon, Cote d´Ivoire and Sierra Leone as compared to Uganda were associated with a lower knowledge score.
CONCLUSION
HCWs had overall limited knowledge, favourable attitudes and little practice of childhood TB diagnosis. Increasing HCW awareness, capacity and skills, and improving access to effective diagnosis are urgently needed.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
E Clinical Medicine. 2024 March 21; Volume 70; 102528.; DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102528
d’Elbée M, Harker M, Mafirakureva N, Nanfuka M, Nguyet MHTN, et al.
E Clinical Medicine. 2024 March 21; Volume 70; 102528.; DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102528