Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 December 1; Volume 7 (Issue 12); e009674.; DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009674
Van Bortel W, Mariën J, Jacobs BKM, Sinzinkayo D, Sinarinzi P, et al.
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 December 1; Volume 7 (Issue 12); e009674.; DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009674
BACKGROUND
Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are one of the key interventions in the global fight against malaria. Since 2014, mass distribution campaigns of LLINs aim for universal access by all citizens of Burundi. In this context, we assess the impact of LLINs mass distribution campaigns on malaria incidence, focusing on the endemic highland health districts. We also explored the possible correlation between observed trends in malaria incidence with any variations in climate conditions.
METHODS
Malaria cases for 2011—2019 were obtained from the National Health Information System. We developed a generalised additive model based on a time series of routinely collected data with malaria incidence as the response variable and timing of LLIN distribution as an explanatory variable to investigate the duration and magnitude of the LLIN effect on malaria incidence. We added a seasonal and continuous-time component as further explanatory variables, and health district as a random effect to account for random natural variation in malaria cases between districts.
RESULTS
Malaria transmission in Burundian highlands was clearly seasonal and increased non-linearly over the study period. Further, a fast and steep decline of malaria incidence was noted during the first year after mass LLIN distribution (p<0.0001). In years 2 and 3 after distribution, malaria cases started to rise again to levels higher than before the control intervention.
CONCLUSION
This study highlights that LLINs did reduce the incidence in the first year after a mass distribution campaign, but in the context of Burundi, LLINs lost their impact after only 1 year.
Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are one of the key interventions in the global fight against malaria. Since 2014, mass distribution campaigns of LLINs aim for universal access by all citizens of Burundi. In this context, we assess the impact of LLINs mass distribution campaigns on malaria incidence, focusing on the endemic highland health districts. We also explored the possible correlation between observed trends in malaria incidence with any variations in climate conditions.
METHODS
Malaria cases for 2011—2019 were obtained from the National Health Information System. We developed a generalised additive model based on a time series of routinely collected data with malaria incidence as the response variable and timing of LLIN distribution as an explanatory variable to investigate the duration and magnitude of the LLIN effect on malaria incidence. We added a seasonal and continuous-time component as further explanatory variables, and health district as a random effect to account for random natural variation in malaria cases between districts.
RESULTS
Malaria transmission in Burundian highlands was clearly seasonal and increased non-linearly over the study period. Further, a fast and steep decline of malaria incidence was noted during the first year after mass LLIN distribution (p<0.0001). In years 2 and 3 after distribution, malaria cases started to rise again to levels higher than before the control intervention.
CONCLUSION
This study highlights that LLINs did reduce the incidence in the first year after a mass distribution campaign, but in the context of Burundi, LLINs lost their impact after only 1 year.
Conference Material > Poster
Gohy B, Brodin N, Musambi M, Mafuko JM, Ndiramiye E, et al.
MSF Scientific Days International 2021: Research. 2021 May 18
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 September 11; Volume 3 (Issue 9); e0001723.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0001723
Gohy B, Opava CH, von Schreeb J, Van den Bergh R, Brus A, et al.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 September 11; Volume 3 (Issue 9); e0001723.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0001723
The importance of measuring outcomes after injury beyond mortality and morbidity is increasingly recognized, though underreported in humanitarian settings. To address shortcomings of existing outcome measures in humanitarian settings, the Activity Independence Measure-Trauma (AIM-T) was developed, and is structured in three subscales (i.e., core, lower limb, and upper limb). This study aimed to assess the AIM-T construct validity (structural validity and hypothesis testing) and reliability (internal consistency, inter-rater reliability and measurement error) in four humanitarian settings (Burundi, Iraq, Cameroon and Central African Republic). Patients with acute injury (n = 195) were assessed using the AIM-T, the Barthel Index (BI), and two pain scores. Structural validity was assessed through confirmatory factor analysis. Hypotheses were tested regarding correlations with BI and pain scores using Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and differences in AIM-T scores between patients’ subgroups, using standardized effect size Cohen’s d (d). Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha (a). AIM-T was reassessed by a second rater in 77 participants to test inter-rater reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The results showed that the AIM-T structure in three subscales had an acceptable fit. The AIM-T showed an inverse weak to moderate correlation with both pain scores (PCC<0.7, p=0.05), positive strong correlation with BI (PCC=0.7, p=0.05), and differed between all subgroups (d=0.5, p=0.05). The inter-rater reliability in the (sub)scales was good to excellent (ICC 0.86–0.91) and the three subscales’ internal consistency was adequate (a=0.7). In conclusion, this study supports the AIM-T validity in measuring independence in mobility activities and its reliability in humanitarian settings, as well as it informs on its interpretability. Thus, the AIM-T could be a valuable measure to assess outcomes after injury in humanitarian settings.
Conference Material > Video (talk)
Mafuko JM
MSF Scientific Days International 2021: Innovation. 2021 May 20
Conference Material > Slide Presentation
Leclair C, Marien J, Sinzinkayo D, Abdelrahman A, Lampaert E, et al.
MSF Scientific Days International 2021: Research. 2021 May 19
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 December 14; Volume 2 (Issue 12); e0001334.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0001334
Gohy B, Opava CH, von Schreeb J, Van den Bergh R, Brus A, et al.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 December 14; Volume 2 (Issue 12); e0001334.; DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0001334
A standardized set of measures to assess functioning after trauma in humanitarian settings has been called for. The Activity Independence Measure for Trauma (AIM-T) is a clinician-rated measure of independence in 20 daily activities among patients after trauma. Designed in Afghanistan, it has since been used in other contexts. Before recommending the AIM-T for wider use, its measurement properties required confirmation. This study aims at item reduction followed by content validity assessment of the AIM-T. Using a two-step revision process, first, routinely collected data from 635 patients at five facilities managing patients after trauma in Haiti, Burundi, Yemen, and Iraq were used for item reduction. This was performed by analyzing inter-item redundancy and distribution of the first version of the AIM-T (AIM-T1) item scores, resulting in a shortened version (AIM-T2). Second, content validity of the AIM-T2 was assessed by item content validity indices (I-CVI, 0–1) based on structured interviews with 23 health care professionals and 60 patients in Haiti, Burundi, and Iraq. Through the analyses, nine pairs of redundant items (r≥0.90) were identified in the AIM-T1, leading to the removal of nine items, and resulting in AIM-T2. All remaining items were judged highly relevant, appropriate, clear, feasible and representative by most of participants (I-CVI>0.5). Ten items with I-CVI 0.5–0.85 were revised to improve their cultural relevance or appropriateness and one item was added, resulting in the AIM-T3. In conclusion, the proposed 12-item AIM-T3 is overall relevant, clear, and representative of independence in daily activity after trauma and it includes items appropriate and feasible to be observed by clinicians across different humanitarian settings. While some additional measurement properties remain to be evaluated, the present version already has the potential to serve as a routine measure to assess patients after trauma in humanitarian settings.
Conference Material > Abstract
Leclair C, Marien J, Sinzinkayo D, Abdelrahman A, Lampaert E, et al.
MSF Scientific Days International 2021: Research. 2021 May 19
INTRODUCTION
In Burundi, malaria continues to be a major public health issue as the leading cause of health facility attendance, high levels of mortality and devastating malaria epidemics in highland areas. Since 2004, Burundi’s National Malaria Control Programme (PNILP) has developed an integrated malaria control strategy. Since 2016, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), in collaboration with the PNILP, has implemented integrated malaria control interventions within two malaria endemic health districts located in the central highlands and eastern border regions.
METHODS
We re-assessed epidemiological trends for malaria in Burundi to: (1) evaluate spatial heterogeneity and seasonality; (2) longitudinally describe trends in disease incidence for three epidemiological strata; and (3) assess the association between long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) mass distribution campaigns (MDC) and disease incidence. Analysis used malaria case data, routinely collected and reported weekly by PNILP from 2011- 2019. Malaria cases were converted into incidence rates, using existing population data, and expressed per 1000 population at risk. Health districts (n=47) were categorized into three different strata based upon geographic elevation and endemic channels, using the quartile method. A generalized additive mixed model (GAMM) was implemented in R to analyze time-series data.
ETHICS
This work met the requirements for exemption from MSF Ethics Review Board review, and was conducted with permission from Sebastian Spencer, Medical Director, Operational Centre Brussels, MSF.
RESULTS
From 2011-2016, seasonality and intensity of malaria transmission was heterogeneous across the three epidemiological strata. The median incidence (cases/1000 population) for health districts <1200m elevation was 6.0 (interquartile range, IQR, 4.3-8.5); for those 1200-1850m, incidence was 12.3 (IQR 8.0-17.6); and for those >1850m, incidence was 2.1 (IQR 1.1-6.3). In contrast to the observed incidence rates for health districts within the endemic channels at <1200m and >1850m, health districts within the endemic
channel at 1200-1850m showed marked seasonality, with a bimodal distribution. Health districts in these endemic channels, had peaks in median incidence of 17.6 cases/1000 and 15.1cases/1000 population in weeks 26 and 52, respectively. GAMM analysis suggested an increasing trend in malaria incidence over the period 2011—2019. The analysis further revealed that LLIN-MDC campaigns were associated with a rapid reduction in malaria incidence, but the epidemiological impact was attenuated after one year. Specifically, comparing malaria incidence in three health districts adjacent to MSF’s intervention area (1200-1850m channel), the 2017 LLIN-MCD was associated with a 44% reduction in clinical incidence one year post-distribution (RR 0.56, 95%CI 0.556-0.56), but no evidence for a reduction two years post-distribution was observed RR 1.10 (95%CI 1.092-1.099).
CONCLUSION
These findings highlight the effectiveness of LLIN as a malaria control intervention across different epidemiological strata in Burundi. However, the duration of functional effectiveness of LLIN is most definitely less than 3 years and may be shorter than one year in Burundi. The reasons underlying these finding are legion. Further operational research is needed to disentangle the dynamic interplay between operational, human behavioural, sociological, and entomological factors.
In Burundi, malaria continues to be a major public health issue as the leading cause of health facility attendance, high levels of mortality and devastating malaria epidemics in highland areas. Since 2004, Burundi’s National Malaria Control Programme (PNILP) has developed an integrated malaria control strategy. Since 2016, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), in collaboration with the PNILP, has implemented integrated malaria control interventions within two malaria endemic health districts located in the central highlands and eastern border regions.
METHODS
We re-assessed epidemiological trends for malaria in Burundi to: (1) evaluate spatial heterogeneity and seasonality; (2) longitudinally describe trends in disease incidence for three epidemiological strata; and (3) assess the association between long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) mass distribution campaigns (MDC) and disease incidence. Analysis used malaria case data, routinely collected and reported weekly by PNILP from 2011- 2019. Malaria cases were converted into incidence rates, using existing population data, and expressed per 1000 population at risk. Health districts (n=47) were categorized into three different strata based upon geographic elevation and endemic channels, using the quartile method. A generalized additive mixed model (GAMM) was implemented in R to analyze time-series data.
ETHICS
This work met the requirements for exemption from MSF Ethics Review Board review, and was conducted with permission from Sebastian Spencer, Medical Director, Operational Centre Brussels, MSF.
RESULTS
From 2011-2016, seasonality and intensity of malaria transmission was heterogeneous across the three epidemiological strata. The median incidence (cases/1000 population) for health districts <1200m elevation was 6.0 (interquartile range, IQR, 4.3-8.5); for those 1200-1850m, incidence was 12.3 (IQR 8.0-17.6); and for those >1850m, incidence was 2.1 (IQR 1.1-6.3). In contrast to the observed incidence rates for health districts within the endemic channels at <1200m and >1850m, health districts within the endemic
channel at 1200-1850m showed marked seasonality, with a bimodal distribution. Health districts in these endemic channels, had peaks in median incidence of 17.6 cases/1000 and 15.1cases/1000 population in weeks 26 and 52, respectively. GAMM analysis suggested an increasing trend in malaria incidence over the period 2011—2019. The analysis further revealed that LLIN-MDC campaigns were associated with a rapid reduction in malaria incidence, but the epidemiological impact was attenuated after one year. Specifically, comparing malaria incidence in three health districts adjacent to MSF’s intervention area (1200-1850m channel), the 2017 LLIN-MCD was associated with a 44% reduction in clinical incidence one year post-distribution (RR 0.56, 95%CI 0.556-0.56), but no evidence for a reduction two years post-distribution was observed RR 1.10 (95%CI 1.092-1.099).
CONCLUSION
These findings highlight the effectiveness of LLIN as a malaria control intervention across different epidemiological strata in Burundi. However, the duration of functional effectiveness of LLIN is most definitely less than 3 years and may be shorter than one year in Burundi. The reasons underlying these finding are legion. Further operational research is needed to disentangle the dynamic interplay between operational, human behavioural, sociological, and entomological factors.