Journal Article > Pre-PrintFull Text
medRxiv. 21 February 2022; DOI:10.1101/2022.02.17.22271108
Yakum MN, Funwie AD, Ajong AB, Tsafack M, Ebaze LE, et al.
medRxiv. 21 February 2022; DOI:10.1101/2022.02.17.22271108
Immunization is the most cost-effective health intervention in the world yet, vaccination uptake is still low with less than 50% of children aged 12-23 months fully vaccinated Cameroon. The objective of this study was to estimate the burden of vaccine hesitancy associated with routine EPI vaccines in Yaounde-Cameroon. A two-stage cross-sectional cluster survey was conducted in Yaoundé in May-June 2022, targeting parents/guardians of children 0-59 months. Clusters were selected with probability proportionate to size (PPS) and household’s selection done using a restricted sampling method. Data collection was done using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Data were cleaned using MS-Excel 2019, and analyzed with R version 4.1.0 (2021-05-18). A total of 529 participants were enrolled out of 708 visited, giving a non-response rate of 25%. In total, vaccine hesitancy was reported in 137(25.90[22.35-29.80] %), and vaccine hesitancy prevalence did not vary significantly across different households’ wealth levels (p-value= 0.3786). However, in wealthy households’ refusal of vaccines (14%) was less than in poorer households (20%). Lack of trust, confidence, and perceived complacency are the leading causes of vaccine hesitancy related to routine immunization in Yaounde-Cameroon. We, therefore, recommend that the burden of vaccine hesitancy should be assessed at national scale and identify sources of misinformation that are at the origin of vaccine hesitancy. Having a clear notion of the effect of social media(Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, etc,), radio, TV, and other information sources might guide interventions to combat vaccine hesitancy.
Journal Article > Pre-Print
medRxiv. 21 February 2022; DOI:10.1101/2022.02.17.22271070
Yakum MN, Funwie AD, Tsafack M, Ebaze LE, Ajong AB, et al.
medRxiv. 21 February 2022; DOI:10.1101/2022.02.17.22271070
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to determine the validity of parent’s recall for immunization using the vaccination card as the reference in Yaounde-Cameroon.
SETTINGS
This study was a communitybased study in all the 6 health districts in Yaounde, Cameroon
PARTICIPANTS
The study targeting parents of children aged 0-59months who had their children’s vaccination cards. The immunization history of each child was taken based on both parent’s recall and vaccination card. Using the vaccination card as a reference, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of parent’s recall were calculated. The degree of agreement and the kappa statistics between the two methods were calculated using R version 4.1.0 (2021-05-18).
RESULTS
A total of 529 households were visited and 87 eligible parents enrolled. Approximately 55.2% of the 27 children were girls and 53% of them were aged 12-59 months. In total, 94.25% of the participants enrolled were one of the biological parents of the children, with mothers making the majority 86.20% of participants. When combined for all vaccines, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of parent’s recall were 63%, 60%, 90%, and 23% respectively. The degree of agreement between the two sources was highest for BCG(94%) and lowest with Polio2(32%). Parent’s recall(94%) was most likely to correctly predict BCG vaccination status of a child than using the scars on the forarm(74%).
CONCLUSION
Our conclusion is that validity and reliability of parent’s recall vary a lot across different vaccines and parent’s recall is not very reliable for immunization status assessment in children. Parent’s recall is preferred for verifying BCG immunization to scars on the forarm. In general, we recommend that parent’s recall for routine immunization should be used only as a last resort or for BCG, and measles and Yellow Fever vaccines.
The objective of this study was to determine the validity of parent’s recall for immunization using the vaccination card as the reference in Yaounde-Cameroon.
SETTINGS
This study was a communitybased study in all the 6 health districts in Yaounde, Cameroon
PARTICIPANTS
The study targeting parents of children aged 0-59months who had their children’s vaccination cards. The immunization history of each child was taken based on both parent’s recall and vaccination card. Using the vaccination card as a reference, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of parent’s recall were calculated. The degree of agreement and the kappa statistics between the two methods were calculated using R version 4.1.0 (2021-05-18).
RESULTS
A total of 529 households were visited and 87 eligible parents enrolled. Approximately 55.2% of the 27 children were girls and 53% of them were aged 12-59 months. In total, 94.25% of the participants enrolled were one of the biological parents of the children, with mothers making the majority 86.20% of participants. When combined for all vaccines, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of parent’s recall were 63%, 60%, 90%, and 23% respectively. The degree of agreement between the two sources was highest for BCG(94%) and lowest with Polio2(32%). Parent’s recall(94%) was most likely to correctly predict BCG vaccination status of a child than using the scars on the forarm(74%).
CONCLUSION
Our conclusion is that validity and reliability of parent’s recall vary a lot across different vaccines and parent’s recall is not very reliable for immunization status assessment in children. Parent’s recall is preferred for verifying BCG immunization to scars on the forarm. In general, we recommend that parent’s recall for routine immunization should be used only as a last resort or for BCG, and measles and Yellow Fever vaccines.