BACKGROUND
Abortion-related complications remain a main cause of maternal mortality. There is little evidence on the availability and quality of post-abortion care (PAC) in humanitarian settings. We assessed the quality of PAC in two hospitals supported by an international organization in Jigawa State (Nigeria) and Bangui (Central African Republic, CAR).
METHODS
We mapped indicators corresponding to the eleven domains of the WHO Maternal and Newborn Health quality-of-care framework to assess inputs, processes (provision and experience of care), and outcomes of PAC. We measured these indicators in four components of a cross-sectional multi-methods study: 1) an assessment of the hospitals’ PAC signal functions, 2) a survey of the knowledge, attitudes, practices, and behavior of 140 Nigerian and 84 CAR clinicians providing PAC, 3) a prospective review of the medical records of 520 and 548 women presenting for abortion complications and, 4) a survey of 360 and 362 of these women who were hospitalized in the Nigerian and CAR hospitals, respectively.
RESULTS
Among the total 27 PAC signal functions assessed, 25 were available in the Nigerian hospital and 26 in the CAR hospital. In both hospitals, less than 2.5% were treated with dilatation and sharp curettage. Over 80% of women received blood transfusion or curative antibiotics when indicated. However, antibiotics were given to about 30% of patients with no documented indication. Among discharged women in CAR, 99% received contraceptive counseling but only 39% did in Nigeria. Over 80% of women in Nigeria reported positive experiences of respect and preservation of dignity. Conversely, in CAR, 37% reported that their privacy was always respected during examination and 62% reported short or very short waiting time before seeing a health provider. In terms of communication, only 15% felt able to ask questions during treatment in both hospitals. The risk of abortion-near-miss happening ≥ 24h after presentation was 0.2% in Nigeria and 1.1% in CAR. Only 65% of women in the Nigerian hospital and 34% in the CAR hospital reported that the staff provided them best care all the time.
CONCLUSIONS
Our comprehensive assessment identified that these two hospitals in humanitarian settings provided lifesaving PAC. However, hospitals need to strengthen the patient-centered approach engaging patients in their own care and ensuring privacy, short waiting times and quality provider-patient communication. Health professionals would benefit from instituting antibiotic stewardships to prevent antibiotic-resistance.
Abortion-related complications remain a main cause of maternal mortality. Post-abortion care (PAC) provision in humanitarian settings suffers from limited accessibility, poor quality, and lack of research on how to address these challenges. We proposed a comprehensive conceptual framework for measuring the quality of PAC and applied it using data from the AMoCo (Abortion-related Morbidity and mortality in fragile or Conflict-affected settings) study in two hospitals supported by Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) in Jigawa State (Nigeria) and Bangui (Central African Republic, CAR).
METHODS
We adapted the WHO Maternal and Newborn Health quality-of-care framework to measure PAC inputs, process (provision and experience of care) and outcomes. We analyzed data from 4 study components: an assessment of the two hospitals’ PAC signal functions, a survey of the knowledge, attitudes, practices, and behavior of 140 and 84 clinicians providing PAC, a prospective review of the medical records of 520 and 548 women presenting for abortion complications, of whom 360 and 362 hospitalized women participated in an interview survey in the Nigerian and CAR hospitals, respectively.
RESULTS
Inputs – Among the total 27 PAC signal functions assessed, 25 were available in the Nigerian hospital and 26.5 in the CAR hospital.
Provision of care – In both hospitals, less than 2.5% were treated with dilatation and sharp curettage, a non-recommended technology when receiving instrumental uterine evacuation. Over 80% received blood transfusion or curative antibiotics when indicated. However, antibiotics were given to about 30% of patients without indication. All (99%) of discharged women in CAR received contraceptive counselling but only 39% in Nigeria.
Experience of care – Women reported generally good experience of respect and preservation of dignity. But only 49% in Nigeria and 59% in CAR said they were given explanations about their care and 15% felt capable of asking questions during treatment in both hospitals.
Outcomes – The risk of healthcare-related abortion-near-miss (happening =24h after presentation) was 0.2% in Nigeria and 1.1% in CAR. Only 65% of women in the Nigerian hospital and 34% in the CAR hospital reported that the staff provided them best care all the time.
CONCLUSION
Our proposed framework enabled comprehensive measurement of the quality of PAC in two MSF-supported hospitals in humanitarian settings. Its application identified that hospitals provided good clinical care resulting in a low risk of healthcare-related abortion-near-miss. However, hospitals need to improve provider-patient communication and would benefit from instituting antibiotic stewardships to prevent antibiotic-resistance.
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a key public health issue, with a myriad of physical, sexual and emotional consequences for the survivors of violence. Social support has been found to be an important factor in mitigating and moderating the consequences of IPV and improving health outcomes. This study's objective was to identify and assess network oriented and support mediated IPV interventions, focused on improving mental health outcomes among IPV survivors.
METHODS
A systematic scoping review of the literature was done adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The search covered a period of 1980 to 2017 with no language restrictions across the following databases, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, PROQUEST, and Cochrane. Studies were included if they were primary studies of IPV interventions targeted at survivors focused on improving access to social support, mental health outcomes and access to resources for survivors.
RESULTS
337 articles were subjected to full text screening, of which 27 articles met screening criteria. The review included both quantitative and qualitative articles. As the focus of the review was on social support, we identified interventions that were i) focused on individual IPV survivors and improving their access to resources and coping strategies, and ii) interventions focused on both individual IPV survivors as well as their communities and networks. We categorized social support interventions identified by the review as Survivor focused, advocate/case management interventions (15 studies), survivor focused, advocate/case management interventions with a psychotherapy component (3 studies), community-focused, social support interventions (6 studies), community-focused, social support interventions with a psychotherapy component (3 studies). Most of the studies, resulted in improvements in social support and/or mental health outcomes of survivors, with little evidence of their effect on IPV reduction or increase in healthcare utilization.
CONCLUSIONS
There is good evidence of the effect of IPV interventions focused on improving access to social support through the use of advocates with strong linkages with community based structures and networks, on better mental health outcomes of survivors, there is a need for more robust/ high quality research to assess in what contexts and for whom, these interventions work better compared to other forms of IPV interventions.