Journal Article > ResearchSubscription Only
World J Surg. 2021 February 9; Volume 45 (Issue 5); 1400-1408.; DOI:10.1007/s00268-021-05972-1
Rahman A, Chao TE, Trelles M, Dominguez LB, Mupenda J, et al.
World J Surg. 2021 February 9; Volume 45 (Issue 5); 1400-1408.; DOI:10.1007/s00268-021-05972-1
BACKGROUND
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) provides surgical care in fragile states, which are more vulnerable to conflict. The primary objective of this study was to compare the indications for operative intervention in surgical projects in fragile states during periods of active conflict (CON) and non-conflict (NON-CON). In addition, risk factors for non-obstetric and obstetric operative mortality were identified.
METHODS
This was a retrospective analysis of MSF surgical projects in fragile states January 1, 2008–December 31, 2017. Variables considered in the analysis include age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiology physical status, emergency status, re-intervention status, indication for surgical intervention, and conflict/non-conflict time period.
RESULTS
There were 30 surgical projects in 13 fragile states with 87,968 surgical interventions in 68,667 patients. Obstetric needs were the most common indication for surgical intervention (n = 28,060, 31.9%) but were more common during NON-CON (n = 23,142, 35.7%) compared to CON periods (n = 4,918, 21.2%, p < 0.001). Trauma was more common during CON (42.0%) compared to NON-CON (23.0%) periods (p < 0.001). Non-obstetric operative mortality was similar during CON (0.2%) compared to NON-CON (0.2%, p = 0.920), but obstetric operative mortality was higher (0.5%) during CON compared to NON-CON (0.2%, p < 0.001) periods. Risk factors for obstetric and non-obstetric mortality included age ≥ 30 years, ASA greater than 1, and emergency intervention.
CONCLUSIONS
Humanitarian surgeons working in fragile states should be prepared to treat a range of surgical needs including trauma and obstetrics during conflict and non-conflict periods. The mortality in obstetric patients was higher during conflict periods, and further research to understand ways to protect this vulnerable group is needed.
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) provides surgical care in fragile states, which are more vulnerable to conflict. The primary objective of this study was to compare the indications for operative intervention in surgical projects in fragile states during periods of active conflict (CON) and non-conflict (NON-CON). In addition, risk factors for non-obstetric and obstetric operative mortality were identified.
METHODS
This was a retrospective analysis of MSF surgical projects in fragile states January 1, 2008–December 31, 2017. Variables considered in the analysis include age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiology physical status, emergency status, re-intervention status, indication for surgical intervention, and conflict/non-conflict time period.
RESULTS
There were 30 surgical projects in 13 fragile states with 87,968 surgical interventions in 68,667 patients. Obstetric needs were the most common indication for surgical intervention (n = 28,060, 31.9%) but were more common during NON-CON (n = 23,142, 35.7%) compared to CON periods (n = 4,918, 21.2%, p < 0.001). Trauma was more common during CON (42.0%) compared to NON-CON (23.0%) periods (p < 0.001). Non-obstetric operative mortality was similar during CON (0.2%) compared to NON-CON (0.2%, p = 0.920), but obstetric operative mortality was higher (0.5%) during CON compared to NON-CON (0.2%, p < 0.001) periods. Risk factors for obstetric and non-obstetric mortality included age ≥ 30 years, ASA greater than 1, and emergency intervention.
CONCLUSIONS
Humanitarian surgeons working in fragile states should be prepared to treat a range of surgical needs including trauma and obstetrics during conflict and non-conflict periods. The mortality in obstetric patients was higher during conflict periods, and further research to understand ways to protect this vulnerable group is needed.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
J Burn Care Res. 2016 November 1; Volume 37 (Issue 6); e519–e524.; DOI:10.1097/BCR.0000000000000305
Stewart BT, Trelles M, Dominguez LB, Wong EG, Fiozounam HT, et al.
J Burn Care Res. 2016 November 1; Volume 37 (Issue 6); e519–e524.; DOI:10.1097/BCR.0000000000000305
OBJECTIVE
Humanitarian organisations care for burns during crisis and while supporting healthcare facilities in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to define the epidemiology of burn-related procedures to aid humanitarian response. In addition, operational data collected from humanitarian organisations are useful for describing surgical need otherwise unmet by national health systems.
METHOD
Procedures performed in operating theatres run by MSF Operations Centre Brussels (MSF-OCB) from July 2008 through June 2014 were reviewed. Surgical specialist missions were excluded. Burn procedures were quantified, related to demographics and reason for humanitarian response and described.
RESULTS
A total of 96,239 operations were performed at 27 MSF-OCB projects in 15 countries between 2008 – 2014. Of the 33,947 general surgical operations, 4,280 (11%) were for burns. This proportion steadily increased from 3% in 2008 to 24% in 2014. People receiving surgical care from conflict relief missions had nearly twice the odds of having a burn operation compared to people requiring surgery in communities affected by natural disaster (aOR 1.94, 95%CI 1.46 – 2.58). Nearly 70% of burn procedures were planned serial visits to the theatre. A diverse skill-set was required.
CONCLUSION
Unmet humanitarian assistance needs increased US$ 400 million dollars in 2013 in the face of an increasing number of individuals affected by crisis and a growing surgical burden. Given the high volume of burn procedures performed at MSF-OCB projects and the resource intensive nature of burn management, requisite planning and reliable funding are necessary to ensure quality for burn care in humanitarian settings.
Humanitarian organisations care for burns during crisis and while supporting healthcare facilities in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to define the epidemiology of burn-related procedures to aid humanitarian response. In addition, operational data collected from humanitarian organisations are useful for describing surgical need otherwise unmet by national health systems.
METHOD
Procedures performed in operating theatres run by MSF Operations Centre Brussels (MSF-OCB) from July 2008 through June 2014 were reviewed. Surgical specialist missions were excluded. Burn procedures were quantified, related to demographics and reason for humanitarian response and described.
RESULTS
A total of 96,239 operations were performed at 27 MSF-OCB projects in 15 countries between 2008 – 2014. Of the 33,947 general surgical operations, 4,280 (11%) were for burns. This proportion steadily increased from 3% in 2008 to 24% in 2014. People receiving surgical care from conflict relief missions had nearly twice the odds of having a burn operation compared to people requiring surgery in communities affected by natural disaster (aOR 1.94, 95%CI 1.46 – 2.58). Nearly 70% of burn procedures were planned serial visits to the theatre. A diverse skill-set was required.
CONCLUSION
Unmet humanitarian assistance needs increased US$ 400 million dollars in 2013 in the face of an increasing number of individuals affected by crisis and a growing surgical burden. Given the high volume of burn procedures performed at MSF-OCB projects and the resource intensive nature of burn management, requisite planning and reliable funding are necessary to ensure quality for burn care in humanitarian settings.
Journal Article > Meta-AnalysisFull Text
Anesthesiology. 2016 March 1; Volume 124 (Issue 3); DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000985
Ariyo P, Trelles M, Helmand R, Amir Y, Hassani GH, et al.
Anesthesiology. 2016 March 1; Volume 124 (Issue 3); DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000985
Anesthesia is integral to improving surgical care in low-resource settings. Anesthesia providers who work in these areas should be familiar with the particularities associated with providing care in these settings, including the types and outcomes of commonly performed anesthetic procedures.
Journal Article > ResearchAbstract
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 September 15; Volume 51 (Issue 4); DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.08.063
Flynn- O Brien KT, Trelles M, Dominguez LB, Hassani GH, Akemani C, et al.
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 September 15; Volume 51 (Issue 4); DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.08.063