logo
Science Portal
Copyright © Médecins Sans Frontières
v2.1.5153.produseast1
About MSF Science Portal
About
Contact Us
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Copyright © Médecins Sans Frontières
v2.1.5153.produseast1
Contribution of maternal adherence to the effect of multiple micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis | Journal Article / Research | MSF Science Portal
Journal Article
|Research

Contribution of maternal adherence to the effect of multiple micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

Smith ER, Gomes F, Adu-Afarwuah S, Aguayo VM, El Arifeen S, Bhutta ZA, Caniglia EC, Christian P, Devakumar D, Dewey KG, Fawzi WW, Friis H, Gomo E, Guindo O, Hallamaa L, Isanaka S, Kæstel P, Lachat C, Maleta K, Moore SE, Oakley EM, Osrin D, Rahman A, Rana Z, Rizvi A, Roberfroid D, Shaikh S, Sonko B, Soofi SB, Subarkah I, Sunawang R, Wang D, West KP, Wu LSF, Zagre N, Bourassa MW, Sudfeld CR
Download

Similar Content
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Abstract

Multiple micronutrient supplements (MMSs) in pregnancy reduces risk of infant low birthweight (LBW) and improves other maternal and infant outcomes compared with iron and folic acid (IFA) supplements alone. However, the impact of timing of initiation and adherence on the MMS effectiveness in real-world programs remains unclear. To address this, we conducted a 2-stage individual participant data meta-analysis that included 15 randomized trials (61,204 pregnant women) and assessed whether the relative effect of MMS differed by the following: adherence alone; adherence in combination with gestational age at initiation; and the total number of tablets taken. We also evaluated the observational association of these factors with outcomes among participants who received MMS. Compared with IFA supplements, the relative effect of MMS on the primary outcome of continuous birthweight was greater with higher adherence (P-interaction < 0.05). Among women who took ≥90% of supplements, MMS increased birthweight by 56 g (95% CI: 45, 67 g), whereas among women who took <60% of supplements, there was no difference in birthweight between MMS and IFA supplements [mean difference (MD): 9 g; 95% CI: −17, 35 g). Higher adherence was also associated with greater effect of MMS on LBW and birthweight-for-gestational age centile and women who took more supplements experienced a greater relative impact of MMS on birthweight-for-gestational age centile and small-for-gestational age births (SGA) as compared with IFA supplements. Observational analyses among participants who received MMS showed that ≥90% adherence was associated with increased birthweight (MD: 44 g; 95% CI: 31, 56 g) and lower risk of LBW [relative risk (RR): 0.93 g; 95% CI: 0.88, 0.98 g] and small-for-gestational age (RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93, 0.98), whereas <75% adherence was associated with greater risk of stillbirth (RR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.83) and maternal anemia (RR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.43) than 75%–90% adherence. Programs should invest in strategies that promote early initiation and high adherence to MMS.

Subject Area

women's healthmalnutritionchild development

Languages

English
DOI
10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100455
Published Date
01 May 2025
PubMed ID
40451462
Journal
Advances in Nutrition
Volume | Issue | Pages
Volume Pages 100455
Dimensions Badge